Some general optimal design results using anisotropic, power law nonlinear elasticity

Recent results on optimal design with anisotropic materials and optimal design of the materials themselves are in most cases based on the assumption of linear clasticity. We shall extend these results to the nonlinear model classified as powerlaw clasticity. These models return proportionality between elastic strain energy density and elastic stress energy density. This is shown to imply localized sensitivity analysis for the total elastic energy, and for a number of optimal design problems this immediately gives practical, general results.For two- and three-dimensional problems the effective strain and the effective stress are defined from an energy consistent point of view, and it is shown that a definition generalizing the von Mises stress must be used. The optimization criterion of uniform energy density also holds for nonlinear materials, and several general conclusions can be based on this fact. Applications to size design illustrate this.For stiffness optimization the ultimate optimal material design problem is addressed. The validity of recent results are extended to nonlinear materials, and a simple proof based on constraint on the Frobenius norm is given. We note that the optimal material is orthotropic, that principal directions of material, strain and stress are aligned, and that there is no shear stiffness. In reality, the constitutive matrix only has one nonzero eigenvalue and the material therefore has stiffness only in relation to the specified strain condition. Results related to orientational design with orthotropic materials are also focused on.With respect to strength optimization, i.e. the more difficult problem with local constraints, we shall comment on the influence of the different strength criteria.

[1]  Pauli Pedersen,et al.  A note on plasticity theory in matrix notation , 1987 .

[2]  Pauli Pedersen,et al.  On thickness and orientational design with orthotropic materials , 1991 .

[3]  Rodney Hill,et al.  New horizons in the mechanics of solids , 1956 .

[4]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis of non‐linear structural systems part I: Theory , 1987 .

[5]  T. Petersen,et al.  Fillet design in cold forging dies , 1994 .

[6]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Variational method for design sensitivity analysis in nonlinear structural mechanics , 1988 .

[7]  R. Hill The mathematical theory of plasticity , 1950 .

[8]  D. Tortorelli,et al.  Tangent operators and design sensitivity formulations for transient non‐linear coupled problems with applications to elastoplasticity , 1994 .

[9]  O. Sigmund Materials with prescribed constitutive parameters: An inverse homogenization problem , 1994 .

[10]  Martin P. Bendsøe,et al.  An Analytical Model to Predict Optimal Material Properties in the Context of Optimal Structural Design , 1994 .

[11]  S. V. Selyugin,et al.  On optimization of beams and frames made of work-hardening elasto-plastic materials , 1994 .

[12]  S. V. Selyugin,et al.  On optimal physically nonlinear trusses , 1995 .

[13]  S. Selyugin Optimality criteria-based algorithms for plane-stress elastoplastic structures , 1995 .

[14]  O. Sigmund Tailoring materials with prescribed elastic properties , 1995 .

[15]  Stephen W. Tsai,et al.  A General Theory of Strength for Anisotropic Materials , 1971 .

[16]  S. Selyugin Optimization criteria and algorithms for bar structures made of work-hardening elasto-plastic materials , 1992 .

[17]  Daniel A. Tortorelli,et al.  Optimal riser design for metal castings , 1995 .

[18]  R. Haftka,et al.  Elements of Structural Optimization , 1984 .

[19]  Pauli Pedersen,et al.  Shapes of orthotropic plates for minimum energy concentration , 1992 .

[20]  Yunliang Ding,et al.  Shape optimization of structures: a literature survey , 1986 .

[21]  Ernest F. Masur,et al.  Optimum Stiffness and Strength of Elastic Structures , 1970 .

[22]  Paull Pedersen,et al.  Design for Minimum Stress Concentration by Finite Elements and Linear Programming , 1982 .