Fully coupled two-phase flow and poromechanics modeling of coalbed methane recovery: Impact of geomechanics on production rate

Abstract This study presents the development and application of a fully coupled two-phase (methane and water) flow, transport, and poromechanics numerical model for the analysis of geomechanical impacts on coalbed methane (CBM) production. The model considers changes in two-phase fluid flow properties, i.e., coal porosity, permeability, water retention, and relative permeability curves through changes in cleat fractures induced by effective stress variations and desorption-induced shrinkage. The coupled simulator is first verified for poromechanics coupling, and simulation parameters of a CBM reservoir model are calibrated by history matching against one year of CBM production field data from Shanxi Province, China. Then, the verified simulator and the calibrated CBM reservoir model are used for predicting the impact of geomechanics on the production rate for twenty years of continuous CBM production. The simulation results show that desorption-induced shrinkage is the dominant process in increasing permeability in the near wellbore region. Away from the wellbore, desorption-induced shrinkage is weaker, and permeability is reduced by pressure depletion and increased effective stress. A sensitivity analysis shows that for coal with a higher sorption strain, a larger initial Young's modulus and a smaller Poisson's ratio promote the enhancement of permeability as well as an increased production rate. Moreover, the conceptual model of the cleat system, whether dominated by vertical cleats with permeability correlated to horizontal stress or with permeability correlated to mean stress, can have a significant impact on the predicted production rate. Overall, the study clearly demonstrates and confirms the critical importance of considering geomechanics for an accurate prediction of CBM production.

[1]  S. Durucan,et al.  Two Phase Relative Permeability of Gas and Water in Coal for Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery and CO2 Storage , 2013 .

[2]  George J. Moridis,et al.  A fully coupled multiphase flow and geomechanics solver for highly heterogeneous porous media , 2014, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[3]  C. M. White,et al.  Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide in Coal with Enhanced Coalbed Methane RecoveryA Review , 2005 .

[4]  Eric W. Lemmon,et al.  Thermophysical Properties of Fluid Systems , 1998 .

[5]  I. Gray,et al.  Reservoir Engineering in Coal Seams: Part 1-The Physical Process of Gas Storage and Movement in Coal Seams , 1987 .

[6]  Ian Palmer,et al.  Permeability changes in coal: Analytical modeling , 2009 .

[7]  C. J. Seto,et al.  A Multicomponent, Two-Phase-Flow Model for CO2 Storage and Enhanced Coalbed-Methane Recovery , 2009 .

[8]  S. Durucan,et al.  CO2 Storage in Deep Unminable Coal Seams , 2005 .

[9]  J. P. Seidle,et al.  Application of Matchstick Geometry To Stress Dependent Permeability in Coals , 1992 .

[10]  Fengde Zhou,et al.  History matching and production prediction of a horizontal coalbed methane well , 2012 .

[11]  D. W. Peaceman Interpretation of Well-Block Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation(includes associated paper 6988 ) , 1978 .

[12]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  A Fully Coupled Multiphase Multicomponent Flow and Geomechanics Model for Enhanced Coalbed-Methane Recovery and CO2 Storage , 2013 .

[13]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Predicting Sorption-Induced Strain and Permeability Increase With Depletion for Coalbed-Methane Reservoirs , 2010 .

[14]  John R. Seidle,et al.  Experimental Measurement of Coal Matrix Shrinkage Due to Gas Desorption and Implications for Cleat Permeability Increases , 1995 .

[15]  L. Jing,et al.  Thermohydromechanics of partially saturated geological media : governing equations and formulation of four finite element models , 2001 .

[16]  T. Moore,et al.  Coalbed methane: A review , 2012 .

[17]  Zhongwei Chen,et al.  Effects of non-Darcy flow on the performance of coal seam gas wells , 2012 .

[18]  L. Connell,et al.  A theoretical model for gas adsorption-induced coal swelling , 2007 .

[19]  J. Rutqvist,et al.  Modeling of CO2 sequestration in coal seams: Role of CO2-induced coal softening on injectivity, storage efficiency and caprock deformation , 2017 .

[20]  Ian D. Palmer,et al.  How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model , 1998 .

[21]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Relative Permeability of CBM Reservoirs: Controls on Curve Shape , 2010 .

[22]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Drawdown Induced Changes in Permeability of Coalbeds: A New Interpretation of the Reservoir Response to Primary Recovery , 2004 .

[23]  Zuleima T. Karpyn,et al.  Development of a multi-mechanistic, dual-porosity, dual-permeability, numerical flow model for coalbed methane reservoirs , 2010 .

[24]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams , 2005 .

[25]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[26]  I. Zulkarnain Simulation study of the effect of well spacing, effect of permeability anisotropy, and effect of Palmer and Mansoori model on coalbed methane production , 2006 .

[27]  N. Higgs,et al.  Anisotropic Model For Permeability Change In Coalbed Methane Wells , 2014 .

[28]  Eyvind Aker,et al.  Comparing Equations for Two-Phase Fluid Flow in Porous Media , 2008 .

[29]  R. Chalaturnyk,et al.  Sensitivity Study of Coalbed Methane Production With Reservoir and Geomechanic Coupling Simulation , 2005 .

[30]  Jonny Rutqvist,et al.  A New Coal-Permeability Model: Internal Swelling Stress and Fracture–Matrix Interaction , 2010 .

[31]  Rick Chalaturnyk,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Stress and Strain Due to Gas Sorption/Desorption and Their Effects on In Situ Permeability of Coalbeds , 2006 .

[32]  A. C. Bumb,et al.  Flow-Testing Coalbed Methane Production Wells in the Presence of Water and Gas , 1987 .

[33]  C. Clarkson,et al.  Transient flow analysis and partial water relative permeability curve derivation for low permeability undersaturated coalbed methane wells , 2015 .

[34]  H. O. Balan,et al.  Assessment of shrinkage-swelling influences in coal seams using rank-dependent physical coal properties , 2009 .

[35]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Incorporating Geomechanical and Dynamic Hydraulic-Fracture-Property Changes Into Rate-Transient Analysis: Example From the Haynesville Shale , 2013 .

[36]  Xuehai Fu,et al.  Relative permeabilities of gas and water for different rank coals , 2011 .

[37]  Hao Xu,et al.  A dynamic prediction model for gas–water effective permeability based on coalbed methane production data , 2014 .

[38]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Coupled flow and geomechanical processes during gas production from coal seams , 2009 .

[39]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  An improved relative permeability model for coal reservoirs , 2013 .

[40]  E. Wang,et al.  Dynamic permeability and porosity evolution of coal seam rich in CBM based on the flow-solid coupling theory , 2017 .

[41]  M. C. Leverett,et al.  Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids , 1941 .

[42]  R. H. Brooks,et al.  Properties of Porous Media Affecting Fluid Flow , 1966 .

[43]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Coupled flow and geomechanical processes during enhanced coal seam methane recovery through CO2 sequestration , 2009 .

[44]  Jishan Liu,et al.  Impact of various parameters on the production of coalbed methane , 2013 .