The Effectiveness of Volunteer Tutoring Programs: A Systematic Review

Synopsis Based on increasing demands for accountability in schools, school administrators are looking for ways to increase the academic performance of students including tutoring. Currently a variety of tutoring approaches are used including volunteer tutoring, peer tutoring, cross-age tutoring, and one-on-one tutoring. The evidence base related to volunteer tutoring has grown in recent years; consequently, this review is based upon only those evaluations of volunteer programs in which tutees were randomly assigned to a treatment or control group. We found 21 studies (with 27 different study cohorts in those studies because several studies provided separate reporting on multiple cohorts) reporting on randomized field trials to guide us in assessing the effectiveness of volunteer tutoring programs. Abstract Background Volunteer tutoring programs are intended to improve student performance, provide mentorship, and improve student self-esteem, as well as behavior. Despite the best of intention and effort, schools are not certain which volunteer tutoring programs are most effective. Therefore, we contend that a rigorous analysis of the extant literature regarding volunteer tutoring programs can provide schools with information about the most effective types of tutoring programs. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of volunteer tutoring programs for improving the academic skills of student enrolled in grades K-8 in the USA, and to further investigate for whom and under what conditions tutoring can be effective.

[1]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[2]  Barbara A. Wasik,et al.  Preventing Early Reading Failure with One-to-One Tutoring: A Review of Five Programs. , 1993 .

[3]  Timothy Shanahan,et al.  On the Effectiveness and Limitations of Tutoring in Reading , 1998 .

[4]  V. L. Allen,et al.  Research on Children Tutoring Children: A Critical Review , 1976 .

[5]  J. Cobb.  The Effects of an Early Intervention Program with Preservice Teachers as Tutors on the Reading Achievement of Primary Grade At Risk Children , 2001 .

[6]  N. Gage,et al.  The Psychology of teaching methods , 1976 .

[7]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[8]  M. Shinn,et al.  Parent Tutoring in Reading Using Literature and Curriculum Materials: Impact on Student Reading Achievement , 2000 .

[9]  Gary W. Ritter.  The academic impact of volunteer tutoring in urban public elementary schools: Results of an experimental design evaluation , 2000 .

[10]  M. Lipsey,et al.  The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: evidence from meta-analysis. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[11]  Olatokunbo S. Fashola.  Building Effective Afterschool Programs , 2001 .

[12]  J. Kagan,et al.  The effectiveness of adult volunteer tutoring on reading among “at risk” first grade children , 1998 .

[13]  Jill A. Weiss.  Paired Reading with Adult Volunteer Tutors as a Reading Intervention for Students with Reading Difficulties. , 1989 .

[14]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research , 2000 .

[15]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  The Effectiveness of One-to-One Tutoring by Community Tutors for at-Risk Beginning Readers , 1997 .

[16]  Patricia F. Vadasy,et al.  Effects of Tutoring in Phonological and Early Reading Skills on Students at Risk for Reading Disabilities , 2000, Journal of learning disabilities.

[17]  Jill H. Allor,et al.  The Efficacy of an Early Literacy Tutoring Program Implemented by College Students , 2004 .

[18]  Russell Gersten,et al.  When Less May Be More: A 2‐Year Longitudinal Evaluation of a Volunteer Tutoring Program Requiring Minimal Training , 2000 .

[19]  S. Goodlad.  Students as tutors and mentors , 1995 .

[20]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform , 1983, CACM.

[21]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[22]  K. Topping,et al.  University and college students as tutors for schoolchildren: a typology and review of evaluation research , 1995 .

[23]  B. Wasik.  Volunteer Tutoring Programs in Reading: A Review , 1998 .

[24]  Paige C. Pullen,et al.  Effects of a volunteer tutoring model on the early literacy development of struggling first grade students , 2004 .

[25]  B. Michael.  Volunteers in Public Schools. , 1990 .

[26]  P. Vadasy.  Community-Based Early Reading Intervention for At-Risk First Graders. , 1997 .

[27]  Darrell Morris,et al.  Helping Low Readers in Grades 2 and 3: An After-School Volunteer Tutoring Program , 1990, The Elementary School Journal.

[28]  Barak Rosenshine,et al.  The Effects of Tutoring Upon Pupil Achievement: A Research Review. , 1969 .

[29]  Martha D. Rekrut.  Peer and Cross-Age Tutoring: The Lessons of Research. , 1994 .

[30]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[31]  Tutoring , 1937 .

[32]  K. White,et al.  Parent Tutoring as a Supplement to Compensatory Education for First-Grade Children , 1988 .

[33]  Laureen Goers Mayfield.  The effects of structured one-on-one tutoring in sight word recognition of first-grade students at-risk for reading failure , 2000 .