Real-time, universal screening for acute HIV infection in a routine HIV counseling and testing population.

CONTEXT Acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection cannot be diagnosed by routine antibody tests and is rarely diagnosed in clinical practice. However, HIV nucleic acid-based testing is widely used to screen for antibody-negative acute infection among low-risk blood donors. OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of screening in high-volume laboratories for acute and long-term HIV infection in a routine HIV testing population, in which HIV infection prevalence is low, using specimen pooling and HIV RNA reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. DESIGN AND SETTING Clinical diagnostic performance evaluation at a state-funded public health virology and serology laboratory. PARTICIPANTS A total of 8505 consecutive individuals presenting for routine HIV counseling and testing during a total of 20 business days to simulate a month of testing in August and December 2001 at 110 publicly funded testing sites in North Carolina. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Prevalence of acute and long-term HIV infection. Serum specimens negative by HIV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) were screened in pools by an ultrasensitive HIV RNA RT-PCR test. Results for individual HIV RNA-positive specimens were reclassified as true or false according to results of confirmatory testing. RESULTS Of the 8505 individuals screened, 8194 had not previously tested HIV positive and had sufficient serum to complete the testing protocol. Of those, 39 had long-term HIV infection (prevalence, 47.6 per 10,000 at-risk persons [95% confidence interval, 33.8-65.0 per 10,000]). Of the 8155 at-risk individuals whose antibody tests were negative, 5 were HIV RNA positive. Four of those had true-positive acute infection (prevalence, 4.9 per 10,000 [95% confidence interval, 1.3-12.5 per 10,000]). All 4 were women; 2 developed symptoms consistent with an acute retroviral syndrome in the week after testing. Screening all specimens required 147 HIV RNA tests. Overall specificity of the strategy was 0.9999. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest the widespread diagnosis of acute HIV infections in a routine testing population is not only possible but feasible using specimen pooling and nucleic acid testing. These additional procedures may increase diagnostic yield by approximately 10% compared with conventional HIV antibody testing.

[1]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  The Serostatus Approach to Fighting the HIV Epidemic: prevention strategies for infected individuals. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[2]  M. Goldman New testing strategy to detect early HIV-1 infection for use in incidence estimates and for clinical and prevention purposes , 1999 .

[3]  A. Vabret,et al.  Contribution of Combined Detection Assays of p24 Antigen and Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Antibodies in Diagnosis of Primary HIV Infection by Routine Testing , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  S. Yerly,et al.  Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) RNA in Pools of Sera Negative for Antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[5]  Klaus Dietz,et al.  On the transmission dynamics of HIV , 1988 .

[6]  A. Blaxhult,et al.  Diagnosis of primary HIV-1 infection and duration of follow-up after HIV exposure , 2000, AIDS.

[7]  G A Satten,et al.  New testing strategy to detect early HIV-1 infection for use in incidence estimates and for clinical and prevention purposes. , 1998, JAMA.

[8]  M. NabalVicuña,et al.  Acute HIV infection , 1992 .

[9]  B. Clotet [Heterosexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus]. , 1987, Medicina clinica.

[10]  S. Kleinman,et al.  The Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Viral Infections , 1996 .

[11]  Susan Little,et al.  Diagnosis of Primary HIV-1 Infection , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  T. Schacker,et al.  Clinical and Epidemiologic Features of Primary HIV Infection , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  K. Radcliffe,et al.  Primary HIV infection , 2002, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[14]  M. Battegay,et al.  Sexual transmission during the incubation period of primary HIV infection. , 2001, JAMA.

[15]  P. Easterbrook,et al.  Early highly active antiretroviral therapy for acute HIV-1 infection preserves immune function of CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Regular Review: Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus , 1988 .

[17]  R Brookmeyer,et al.  Feasibility of pooling sera for HIV-1 viral RNA to diagnose acute primary HIV-1 infection and estimate HIV incidence , 2000, AIDS.

[18]  E. Rosenberg,et al.  Immune control of HIV-1 after early treatment of acute infection , 2000, Nature.

[19]  W. Miller,et al.  HIV in body fluids during primary HIV infection: implications for pathogenesis, treatment and public health , 2001, AIDS.

[20]  I. Longini,et al.  Role of the primary infection in epidemics of HIV infection in gay cohorts. , 1995, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[21]  S. J. Clark,et al.  High titers of cytopathic virus in plasma of patients with symptomatic primary HIV-1 infection. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.