Extinction revisited: Similarities between extinction and reductions in US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response

The mechanisms of extinction were examined by reducing the intensity of the unconditioned stimulus (US) after acquisition training to determine whether such reductions lie on a continuum with CS-alone extinction. The experiments revealed that reductions in US intensity yielded extinction-like effects. Specifically, there were proportional reductions in the daily mean level of responding across sessions. There were also persistent within-session declines and between-session increases of responding analogous to spontaneous recovery. Surprisingly, even when US intensity was held constant, within-session declines and between-session increases were apparent. The results are discussed with respect to possible contributions from unlearning, new learning, generalization decrement, and nonassociative loss, especially CS-specific attentional changes and CR-specific reactive inhibition.

[1]  B. Skinner,et al.  Principles of Behavior , 1944 .

[2]  J. Konorski.  Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. , 1948 .

[3]  D. Zeaman,et al.  Response latency as a function of the amount of reinforcement. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  R. R. Bush,et al.  A Mathematical Model for Simple Learning , 1951 .

[5]  R. H. Waters,et al.  The Mirror Drawing Experiment: A Brief Historical Note , 1952 .

[6]  W. Estes.  Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. , 1955, Psychological review.

[7]  K. Spence.  A theory of emotionally based drive (D) and its relation to performance in simple learning situations. , 1958 .

[8]  K. Spence,et al.  UCS intensity and the associative (habit) strength of the eyelid CR. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  G. Collier,et al.  Some relations between the intensive properties of the consummatory response and reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  I. Gormezano,et al.  Effects of alternating classical conditioning and extinction sessions on the conditioned nictitating membrane response of the rabbit , 1965 .

[11]  J. B. Sidowski,et al.  Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology , 1966 .

[12]  J. Konorski.  Integrative activity of the brain : an interdisciplinary approach , 1967 .

[13]  E. Capaldi.  A Sequential Hypothesis of Instrumental Learning1 , 1967 .

[14]  M. C. Smith,et al.  CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[15]  E. Capaldi,et al.  Schedule of partial reward and the negative contrast effect. , 1969 .

[16]  P. J. Sheafor,et al.  Classical appetitive conditioning of the rabbit's (Oryctolagus cuniculus) jaw-movement response with a single-alternation schedule. , 1971 .

[17]  N. Spear.  Chapter 2 – FORGETTING AS RETRIEVAL FAILURE1 , 1971 .

[18]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[19]  F. Hoehler,et al.  Classical nictitating membrane conditioning in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): single alternation with differential intertrial intervals. , 1973, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[20]  C. Booraem,et al.  Positive and Negative Contrast in Successive Nondifferential Conditioning: A New Approach to Between-Subjects Methodology , 1974 .

[21]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[22]  N. Mackintosh.  A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[23]  W. Cox,et al.  A Review of Recent Incentive Contrast Studies Involving Discrete-Trial Procedures , 1975 .

[24]  R. Rescorla,et al.  The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[25]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Recovery of the US representation over time during extinction , 1978 .

[26]  C. M. Gibbs,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response: Effects of reinforcement schedule on response maintenance and resistance to extinction , 1978, Animal learning & behavior.

[27]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  The effect of temporal single alternation on learned increases in hippocampal unit activity in classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response , 1979 .

[28]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980 .

[29]  Isidore Gormezano,et al.  Microprocessor control and A/D data acquisition in classical conditioning , 1980 .

[30]  A G Barto,et al.  Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction. , 1981, Psychological review.

[31]  F. Hoehler,et al.  Motivational vs. associative role of the US in classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response , 1981 .

[32]  C. Flaherty.  Incentive contrast: A review of behavioral changes following shifts in reward , 1982 .

[33]  R. Hinson.  Effects of UCS preexposure on excitatory and inhibitory rabbit eyelid conditioning: an associative effect of conditioned contextual stimuli. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[34]  I. Gormezano,et al.  Effects of US duration on classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. , 1983 .

[35]  JOHN W. Moore,et al.  Hall and Pearce negative transfer: Assessments in conditioned suppression and nictitating membrane conditioning experiments , 1984 .

[36]  R. Tait,et al.  US preexposures retard excitatory and facilitate inhibitory conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response , 1986 .

[37]  M. Bouton,et al.  Analysis of the associative and occasion-setting properties of contexts participating in a Pavlovian discrimination. , 1986 .

[38]  T. Schachtman,et al.  The role of local context in autoshaping , 1987 .

[39]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Modeling the Neural Substrates of Associative Learning and Memory: A Computational Approach , 1987 .

[40]  A. Klopf.  A neuronal model of classical conditioning , 1988 .

[41]  C. M. Gibbs,et al.  Transduction of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response , 1988 .

[42]  E. Kehoe.  A layered network model of associative learning: learning to learn and configuration. , 1988, Psychological review.

[43]  Mark E. Bouton,et al.  Slow reacquisition following extinction: Context, encoding, and retrieval mechanisms. , 1989 .

[44]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  Evolution of a structured connectionist model of Pavlovian conditioning (AESOP). , 1989 .

[45]  S. Klein,et al.  Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory , 1991 .

[46]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Time-Derivative Models of Pavlovian Reinforcement , 1990 .

[47]  S. Robbins.  Mechanisms underlying spontaneous recovery in autoshaping. , 1990 .

[48]  M Bouton,et al.  Context and retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. , 1991 .

[49]  I. Gormezano,et al.  Trace conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response as a function of CS-US interstimulus interval and trials per session , 1991 .

[50]  C. Flaherty,et al.  Current Topics in Animal Learning : Brain, Emotion, and Cognition , 1991 .

[51]  E. Kehoe,et al.  Rapid reacquisition in conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. , 1992 .

[52]  Extinction of Comparator Stimuli during and after Acquisition: Differential Facilitative Effects on Pavlovian Responding , 1993 .

[53]  F. Mcsweeney,et al.  Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures. , 1993, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[54]  M. Bouton.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Local context and the comparator hypothesis , 1993 .

[56]  E. Capaldi.  The sequential view: From rapidly fading stimulus traces to the organization of memory and the abstract concept of number , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  T. Schachtman,et al.  Slow reacquisition of a conditioned taste aversion , 1995 .

[58]  E. Macrae,et al.  TRANSFER BETWEEN CONDITIONAL AND DISCRETE DISCRIMINATIONS IN CONDITIONING OF THE RABBIT NICTITATING MEMBRANE RESPONSE , 1995 .

[59]  D L Alkon,et al.  Conditioning-specific modification of the rabbit's unconditioned nictitating membrane response. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[60]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  Past experience, recency, and spontaneous recovery in choice behavior , 1996 .

[61]  J. L. Calton,et al.  Conditioned Inhibition Produced by Extinction of a Conditioned Stimulus , 1996, Learning and motivation.

[62]  M. Bouton,et al.  Reacquisition following extinction in appetitive conditioning , 1996 .

[63]  E. Kehoe,et al.  Transfer and Counterconditioning of Conditional Control in the Rabbit Nictitating Membrane Response , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[64]  W. O’Donohue.  Learning and Behavior Therapy , 1997 .

[65]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Contextually Based Conditional Discrimination of the Rabbit Eyeblink Response , 1998, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[66]  Mark E. Bouton,et al.  The role of context in classical conditioning: Some implications for cognitive behavior therapy. , 1998 .

[67]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Renewal of Comparator Stimuli , 1998 .

[68]  Extinction: A review of theory and the evidence suggesting that memories are not erased with nonreinforcement. , 1998 .

[69]  B. Schreurs,et al.  Conditioning the unconditioned response: modification of the rabbit's (Oryctolagus cuniculus) unconditioned nictitating membrane response. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[70]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Time, rate, and conditioning. , 2000, Psychological review.

[71]  F. Mcsweeney,et al.  Habituation may contribute to within-session decreases in responding under high-rate schedules of reinforcement , 2001 .

[72]  R. Rescorla.  Retraining of extinguished Pavlovian stimuli. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[73]  G. Hall,et al.  Tests for inhibition after extinction of a conditioned stimulus in the flavour aversion procedure. , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[74]  John A. Nevin,et al.  Resistance to extinction: contingency termination and generalization decrement , 2001 .

[75]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The rat approximates an ideal detector of changes in rates of reward: implications for the law of effect. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[76]  M. Mauk,et al.  A Mechanism for Savings in the Cerebellum , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.