Towards Integrated Design and Delivery Solutions: Pinpointed Challenges of Process Change

Abstract This article focuses on the implementation of integrated design methods in construction projects and, in particular, the change that the integration development calls for in the construction process. By a qualitative case study of a Finnish project using the latest technology, we analysed the current building process and pointed out problems and benefits in respect of the application of new technologies. Identified issues were pinpointed as to their context within the process, and classified into the following categories: technology, process and people. Analysis revealed new challenges related to project management and coordination caused by the introduction of building information model (BIM)-based design, analysis, cost estimation and fabrication into the existing process. A study method was used that helps to create a shared understanding of the process and its development issues within participants of the research: researchers as well as interviewees. The aim of the research was to learn from the experiences of early application of integrated design and delivery solutions and to identify process changes needed for the successful and effective implementation of BIM. The results of the research encouraged a shift from mainly technological development to a systemic development of the construction process.

[1]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Antecedents of Successful Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Design Implementation in Design and Construction Networks , 2007 .

[2]  Anita Moum,et al.  Design team stories: Exploring interdisciplinary use of 3D object models in practice , 2010 .

[3]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Paradigm Trajectories of Building Information Modeling Practice in Project Networks , 2009 .

[4]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  CAD standardisation in the construction industry — A process view , 2010 .

[5]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[6]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Utpal Roy,et al.  Product modeling within the framework of the World Wide Web , 1999 .

[8]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[9]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  A survey of CAD and virtual reality within the house building industry , 1999 .

[10]  S. Fox,et al.  Interorganizational use of building information models: potential for automational, informational and transformational effects , 2007 .

[11]  A. Kadefors.  Institutions in building projects: Implications for flexibility and change , 1995 .

[12]  Anita Moum,et al.  What did you learn from practice today? Exploring experiences from a Danish R&D effort in digital construction , 2009, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[13]  Rob Howard,et al.  Building information modelling - Experts' views on standardisation and industry deployment , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[14]  Thomas Froese,et al.  PRACTICE NOTE Building information modelling demystified: does it make business sense to adopt BIM? , 2009, ICIT 2008.

[15]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[16]  Panagiotis Mitropoulos,et al.  TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATIONS , 1999 .

[17]  Olle Samuelson.  The IT-barometer - a decade's development of IT use in the Swedish construction sector , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[18]  Anthony Williams,et al.  A proposed framework to investigate building information modelling through knowledge elicitation and visual models , 2007 .

[19]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors , 2008 .

[20]  Salman Azhar,et al.  Building Information Modeling ( BIM ) : Benefits , Risks and Challenges , 2008 .

[21]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[22]  Mahmoud R. Halfawy,et al.  Building Integrated Architecture/Engineering/Construction Systems Using Smart Objects: Methodology and Implementation , 2005 .

[23]  Varun Grover,et al.  The influence of information technology diffusion and business process change on perceived productivity: The IS executive's perspective , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Jan Karlshøj,et al.  Review of the Development andImplementation of IFC compatible BIM , 2008 .

[25]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[26]  D. L. Flarey.  Reengineering the Corporation , 1994 .

[27]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  IT implementation in the construction organization , 2002 .

[28]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology , 1995, DATB.

[29]  Arto Kiviniemi,et al.  Requirements management interface to building product models , 2005 .

[30]  Robert Owen,et al.  CIB White Paper on IDDS Integrated Design & Delivery Solutions [328] , 2009 .

[31]  Steven J. Fenves,et al.  A foundation for interoperability in next-generation product development systems , 2001, Comput. Aided Des..

[32]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Case study principles for different types of cases , 1997 .

[33]  J. Taylor.  Understanding and managing systemic innovation in project-based industries , 2004 .

[34]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[35]  Chris Harty,et al.  Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach , 2005 .

[36]  Riitta Smeds,et al.  Implementing Knowledge into Action in Organizations.Simulation games for successful process innovation , 2001 .