Machine Learning Uncovers Aerosol Size Information From Chemistry and Meteorology to Quantify Potential Cloud‐Forming Particles

Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) are mediators of aerosol‐cloud interactions, which contribute to the largest uncertainty in climate change prediction. Here, we present a machine learning (ML)/artificial intelligence (AI) model that quantifies CCN from model‐simulated aerosol composition, atmospheric trace gas, and meteorological variables. Comprehensive multi‐campaign airborne measurements, covering varied physicochemical regimes in the troposphere, confirm the validity of and help probe the inner workings of this ML model: revealing for the first time that different ranges of atmospheric aerosol composition and mass correspond to distinct aerosol number size distributions. ML extracts this information, important for accurate quantification of CCN, additionally from both chemistry and meteorology. This can provide a physicochemically explainable, computationally efficient, robust ML pathway in global climate models that only resolve aerosol composition; potentially mitigating the uncertainty of effective radiative forcing due to aerosol‐cloud interactions (ERFaci) and improving confidence in assessment of anthropogenic contributions and climate change projections.

[1]  J. Jimenez,et al.  The importance of size ranges in aerosol instrument intercomparisons: a case study for the Atmospheric Tomography Mission , 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[2]  Andrew R. Whitehill,et al.  Investigation of factors controlling PM2.5 variability across the South Korean Peninsula during KORUS-AQ , 2020, Elementa.

[3]  M. DeMaria,et al.  Applying Satellite Observations of Tropical Cyclone Internal Structures to Rapid Intensification Forecast With Machine Learning , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[4]  J. Dramsch,et al.  70 years of machine learning in geoscience in review , 2020, Advances in Geophysics.

[5]  F. Yu,et al.  Using machine learning to derive cloud condensation nuclei number concentrations from commonly available measurements , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[6]  E. Ray,et al.  A large source of cloud condensation nuclei from new particle formation in the tropics , 2019, Nature.

[7]  J. Peischl,et al.  ATom: L2 In Situ Measurements from NOAA Nitrogen Oxides and Ozone (NOyO3) Instrument , 2019 .

[8]  J. Crounse,et al.  ATom: L2 In Situ Data from Caltech Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer (CIT-CIMS) , 2019 .

[9]  P. Campuzano‐Jost,et al.  ATom: L2 Measurements from CU High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (HR-AMS) , 2019 .

[10]  F. Yu,et al.  Spatioseasonal Variations of Atmospheric Ammonia Concentrations Over the United States: Comprehensive Model‐Observation Comparison , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[11]  K. Froyd,et al.  ATom: L2 In Situ Measurements of Aerosol Microphysical Properties (AMP) , 2019 .

[12]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Aerosol size distributions during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom): methods, uncertainties, and data products , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[13]  A. Segers,et al.  Machine learning for observation bias correction with application to dust storm data assimilation , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[14]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science , 2019, Nature.

[15]  J. D. de Gouw,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol production from local emissions dominates the organic aerosol budget over Seoul, South Korea, during KORUS-AQ , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[16]  David C. Carslaw,et al.  Random forest meteorological normalisation models for Swiss PM 10 trend analysis , 2018 .

[17]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Evaluation of the new capture vapourizer for aerosol mass spectrometers (AMS) through laboratory studies of inorganic species , 2016 .

[18]  K. Jucks,et al.  Planning, implementation, and scientific goals of the Studies of Emissions and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC4RS) field mission , 2016 .

[19]  J. Peischl,et al.  The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Campaign , 2015 .

[20]  Andreas Ziegler,et al.  ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R , 2015, 1508.04409.

[21]  A. Sorooshian,et al.  On the competition among aerosol number, size and composition in predicting CCN variability: a multi-annual field study in an urbanized desert. , 2015, Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

[22]  Douglas M. Bates,et al.  Fast and Elegant Numerical Linear Algebra Using the RcppEigen Package , 2013 .

[23]  N. Speybroeck Classification and regression trees , 2012, International Journal of Public Health.

[24]  Glenn E. Shaw,et al.  The Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) mission: design, execution, and first results , 2010 .

[25]  F. Yu,et al.  Simulation of particle size distribution with a global aerosol model: contribution of nucleation to aerosol and CCN number concentrations , 2009 .

[26]  A. Nenes,et al.  Scanning Flow CCN Analysis—A Method for Fast Measurements of CCN Spectra , 2009 .

[27]  Dirk Richter,et al.  Organic aerosol formation in urban and industrial plumes near Houston and Dallas, Texas , 2009 .

[28]  C. Twohy,et al.  Droplet nuclei in non-precipitating clouds: composition and size matter , 2008 .

[29]  J. Hudson Variability of the relationship between particle size and cloud‐nucleating ability , 2007 .

[30]  Katrin Fuhrer,et al.  Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[31]  M. Andreae,et al.  Size Matters More Than Chemistry for Cloud-Nucleating Ability of Aerosol Particles , 2006, Science.

[32]  S. Menon,et al.  The radiative influence of aerosol effects on liquid-phase cumulus and stratiform clouds based on sensitivity studies with two climate models , 2006 .

[33]  A. Nenes,et al.  A Continuous-Flow Streamwise Thermal-Gradient CCN Chamber for Atmospheric Measurements , 2005 .

[34]  George Tselioudis,et al.  GCM Simulations of the Aerosol Indirect Effect: Sensitivity to Cloud Parameterization and Aerosol Burden , 2002 .

[35]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle , 2001, Science.

[36]  Ronald,et al.  Drizzle Suppression in Ship Tracks. , 2000 .

[37]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Reduction of tropical cloudiness by soot , 2000, Science.

[38]  Rosenfeld,et al.  Suppression of rain and snow by urban and industrial air pollution , 2000, Science.

[39]  J. Hansen,et al.  Radiative forcing and climate response , 1997 .

[40]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  The sulfate‐CCN‐cloud albedo effect , 1995 .

[41]  R. Pincus,et al.  Effect of precipitation on the albedo susceptibility of clouds in the marine boundary layer , 1994, Nature.

[42]  D. W. Johnson,et al.  The Measurement and Parameterization of Effective Radius of Droplets in Warm Stratocumulus Clouds , 1994 .

[43]  B. Albrecht Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[44]  K. Liou,et al.  The role of cloud microphysical processes in climate: an assessment from a one-dimensional perspective , 1989 .

[45]  T. L. Wolfe,et al.  An assessment of the impact of pollution on global cloud albedo , 1984 .

[46]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[47]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[48]  S. Twomey The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds , 1977 .

[49]  S. Twomey Pollution and the Planetary Albedo , 1974 .

[50]  J. W. Fitzgerald Dependence of the Supersaturation Spectrum of CCN on Aerosol Size Distribution and Composition , 1973 .

[51]  C. Junge,et al.  Relationship of Cloud Nuclei Spectra to Aerosol Size Distribution and Composition , 1971 .

[52]  S. Twomey,et al.  The nuclei of natural cloud formation part II: The supersaturation in natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet concentration , 1959 .

[53]  J. Uin,et al.  Southern Great Plains (SGP) Aerosol Observing System (AOS) Instrument Handbook , 2021 .

[54]  Stefanie Seiler,et al.  Finding Groups In Data , 2016 .

[55]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[56]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[57]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[58]  L. Breiman Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.