The influence of medium conductivity on cells exposed to nsPEF

Nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) have proven useful for transporting cargo across cell membranes and selectively activating cellular pathways. The chemistry and biophysics governing this cellular response, however, are complex and not well understood. Recent studies have shown that the conductivity of the solution cells are exposed in could play a significant role in plasma membrane permeabilization and, thus, the overall cellular response. Unfortunately, the means of detecting this membrane perturbation has traditionally been limited to analyzing one possible consequence of the exposure – diffusion of molecules across the membrane. This method has led to contradictory results with respect to the relationship between permeabilization and conductivity. Diffusion experiments also suffer from “saturation conditions” making multi-pulse experiments difficult. As a result, this method has been identified as a key stumbling block to understanding the effects of nsPEF exposure. To overcome these limitations, we recently developed a nonlinear optical imaging technique based on second harmonic generation (SHG) that allows us to identify nanoporation in live cells during the pulse in a wide array of conditions. As a result, we are able to explore and fully test whether lower conductivity extracellular solutions could induce more efficient nanoporation. This hypothesis is based on membrane charging and the relative difference between the extracellular solution and the cytoplasm. The experiments also allow us to test the noise floor of our methodology against the effects of ion leakage. The results emphasize that the electric field, not ionic phenomenon, are the driving force behind nsPEF-induced membrane nanoporation.

[1]  Ibtissam Echchgadda,et al.  Evaluation of the Genetic Response of U937 and Jurkat Cells to 10-Nanosecond Electrical Pulses (nsEP) , 2016, PloS one.

[2]  Isabelle Leray,et al.  Cell membrane permeabilization by 12-ns electric pulses: Not a purely dielectric, but a charge-dependent phenomenon. , 2015, Bioelectrochemistry.

[3]  Caleb C Roth,et al.  Bipolar nanosecond electric pulses are less efficient at electropermeabilization and killing cells than monopolar pulses. , 2014, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[4]  Michael B. Sano,et al.  Theoretical Considerations of Tissue Electroporation With High-Frequency Bipolar Pulses , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Isabelle Leray,et al.  Impact of external medium conductivity on cell membrane electropermeabilization by microsecond and nanosecond electric pulses , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Mehdi Shadaram,et al.  Characterization of Pressure Transients Generated by Nanosecond Electrical Pulse (nsEP) Exposure , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Hope T. Beier,et al.  Characterization of acoustic shockwaves generated by exposure to nanosecond electrical pulses , 2014, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[8]  Andrei G. Pakhomov,et al.  Two Modes of Cell Death Caused by Exposure to Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  D Miklavcic,et al.  Cell membrane electropermeabilization by symmetrical bipolar rectangular pulses. Part II. Reduced electrolytic contamination. , 2001, Bioelectrochemistry.

[10]  Andrea M. Armani,et al.  Investigating membrane nanoporation induced by bipolar pulsed electric fields via second harmonic generation , 2016 .

[11]  Mayya Tokman,et al.  Electric Field-Driven Water Dipoles: Nanoscale Architecture of Electroporation , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  D. Goeddel,et al.  TNF-R1 Signaling: A Beautiful Pathway , 2002, Science.

[13]  Bennett L Ibey,et al.  Detecting subtle plasma membrane perturbation in living cells using second harmonic generation imaging. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Bennett L Ibey,et al.  Lipid nanopores can form a stable, ion channel-like conduction pathway in cell membrane. , 2009, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[15]  Ravindra P. Joshi,et al.  Ultrashort electrical pulses open a new gateway into biological cells , 2004 .

[16]  P. Thomas Vernier,et al.  Life Cycle of an Electropore: Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Steps in Pore Creation and Annihilation , 2010, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[17]  T. Mandrup-Poulsen,et al.  A choice of death – the signal-transduction of immune-mediated beta-cell apoptosis , 2001, Diabetologia.

[18]  Bennett L Ibey,et al.  Quantifying pulsed electric field-induced membrane nanoporation in single cells. , 2016, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  S. R. Datta,et al.  Akt Phosphorylation of BAD Couples Survival Signals to the Cell-Intrinsic Death Machinery , 1997, Cell.