A Method for Assessing the Performance of e-Government Twitter Accounts

This paper introduces a method for assessing the influence of Twitter accounts of central e-government agencies. It first stresses the importance of activity and popularity of the e-government accounts, and also the importance of community formation among followers-citizens, as the two main stages of e-government adoption. The proposed approach combines activity and popularity of the accounts and followers’ community characteristics in a ranking system, using an idea originally introduced to measure blogosphere authority. A Twitter Authority Index is produced. The method is demonstrated through an extended example: 56 Twitter accounts of ministries of EU countries are sorted according to their indexes in the proposed ranking system. Detailed values for the ministries’ accounts and average values for the countries that the ministries belong to are reported and commented.

[1]  M. Newman.  Models of the Small World: A Review , 2000, cond-mat/0001118.

[2]  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos,et al.  InfluenceTracker: Rating the impact of a Twitter account , 2014, AIAI Workshops.

[3]  Finding Correlation between Content Based Features and the Popularity of a Celebrity on Twitter , 2014 .

[4]  Wendy Liu,et al.  Homophily and Latent Attribute Inference: Inferring Latent Attributes of Twitter Users from Neighbors , 2012, ICWSM.

[5]  Yun Chi,et al.  Identifying opinion leaders in the blogosphere , 2007, CIKM '07.

[6]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[7]  Richard D. Waters,et al.  Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter , 2011 .

[8]  Lada A. Adamic.  The Small World Web , 1999, ECDL.

[9]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  Two types of Twitter users with equally many followers , 2013, 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013).

[10]  D. Bortree,et al.  Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups' Facebook profiles , 2009 .

[11]  Thomas W. Valente.  Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[12]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[14]  Chris Arney,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World (Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J.; 2010) [Book Review] , 2013, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[15]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[16]  Alexander Richter,et al.  Enterprise Microblogging: Procrastination or productive use? , 2010, AMCIS.

[17]  Alex Leavitt,et al.  The Influentials : New Approaches for Analyzing Influence on Twitter , 2009 .

[18]  Faezeh Sadat Gohari,et al.  A ComprehensiveFramework for Identifying Viral Marketing's Influencers in Twitter , 2014 .

[19]  Isabel Anger,et al.  Measuring influence on Twitter , 2011, i-KNOW '11.

[20]  Jialiang Chen,et al.  A Novel Topical Authority-Based Microblog Ranking , 2014, APWeb.

[21]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  Twitter reciprocal reply networks exhibit assortativity with respect to happiness , 2011, J. Comput. Sci..

[22]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[23]  Shyhtsun Felix Wu,et al.  Measuring message propagation and social influence on Twitter.com , 2013, Int. J. Commun. Networks Distributed Syst..

[24]  John Domingue,et al.  The Future of the Internet , 1999, Academia Letters.

[25]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World [Book Review] , 2013, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[26]  M. Weigt,et al.  On the properties of small-world network models , 1999, cond-mat/9903411.

[27]  Andreas Jungherr.  Twitter as Political Communication Space: Publics, Prominent Users, and Politicians , 2015 .

[28]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[29]  Mark Newman,et al.  Models of the Small World , 2000 .

[30]  Trent Seltzer,et al.  The dialogic potential of weblogs in relationship building , 2007 .

[31]  Tejas Desai,et al.  Factors that contribute to social media influence within an Internal Medicine Twitter learning community , 2014, F1000Research.

[32]  Dianne Lux Wigand,et al.  Twitter takes wing in government: diffusion, roles, and management , 2010, DG.O.

[33]  O N 5 MEASURING INFLUENCE IN THE POLITICAL BLOGOSPHERE WHO ’ S WINNING AND HOW CAN WE TELL ? BY , .

[34]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement and analysis of online social networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[35]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[36]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[37]  Vasiliki Vrana,et al.  A Network Analysis of Greek Tech Blogs: A Lonely Road , 2014 .

[38]  Ivan Koprić,et al.  Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making , 2006 .

[39]  Qi He,et al.  TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers , 2010, WSDM '10.

[40]  Thomas Gottron,et al.  Bad news travel fast: a content-based analysis of interestingness on Twitter , 2011, WebSci '11.

[41]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[42]  A.R.M. Teutle,et al.  Twitter: Network properties analysis , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Electronics Communications and Computers (CONIELECOMP).

[43]  Azer Bestavros,et al.  Small-world characteristics of Internet topologies and implications on multicast scaling , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[44]  Dimitris Kydros,et al.  A Network Analysis of the Greek Parliament and some Socio-Economic Issues , 2012 .

[45]  C. University,et al.  Finding Patterns in Blog Shapes and Blog Evolution , 2015 .

[46]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[47]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[48]  Ke Xu,et al.  Video requests from Online Social Networks: Characterization, analysis and generation , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[49]  E. David,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[50]  Christian Borgs,et al.  We know who you followed last summer: inferring social link creation times in twitter , 2011, WWW.

[51]  Richard Lucas,et al.  Tweeting Government: A Case of Australian Government Use of Twitter , 2011, 2011 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing.

[52]  Vasiliki Vrana,et al.  Exploring potential communities of followers in governmental Twitter accounts of EU countries , 2014, EGOSE '14.

[53]  Rakesh Agrawal,et al.  On participation in group chats on Twitter , 2013, WWW.

[54]  Abdollah Aghaie,et al.  Identifying Opinion Leaders for Marketing by Analyzing Online Social Networks , 2011, Int. J. Virtual Communities Soc. Netw..

[55]  Le Song,et al.  Learning Social Infectivity in Sparse Low-rank Networks Using Multi-dimensional Hawkes Processes , 2013, AISTATS.

[56]  danah boyd,et al.  Can social network sites enable political action , 2008 .