Spatial Sub-Sampling Using Local Endmembers for Adapting OSP and SSEE for Large-Scale Hyperspectral Surveys

Airborne and satellite hyperspectral sensors can collect significant quantities of data, commonly terabits in size. Thus, there is a need for the development of computational cost effective algorithms that speed up processing, yet retain essential data quality and information. Endmember extraction is critical in the processing chain of hyperspectral data. Existing methods have primarily been demonstrated on small data sets so their usefulness with large data sets has not been fully explored. The objective of this paper is to adapt the Orthogonal Subspace Projection (OSP) and Spatial Spectral Endmember Extraction (SSEE) algorithms, such that they run efficiently on large data sets without the loss of global image endmember quality. This is demonstrated using a simulated and two real hyperspectral images, the last of which is a multi- flight-line survey. The two adapted methods (OSP SS and SSEE SS) make use of spatial sub-sampling via local endmember extraction to reduce the size of the original data set. This paper will demonstrate that this type of spatial sub-sampling retains the full volume of the data, and thus, the vertices of the simplex that represent the global image endmembers. The results also show that computational time is reduce by more than half using the adapted methods. For the large multi- flight-line survey SSEE SS was able to better retain endmembers of natural materials compared with OSP SS. These results illustrate the potential of spatial sub-sampling for other endmember extraction tools when dealing with multi-flight-line surveys.

[1]  Shaohui Mei,et al.  Spatial Purity Based Endmember Extraction for Spectral Mixture Analysis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Signal Theory Methods in Multispectral Remote Sensing , 2003 .

[3]  Benoit Rivard,et al.  Intra- and inter-class spectral variability of tropical tree species at La Selva, Costa Rica: Implications for species identification using HYDICE imagery , 2006 .

[4]  Glenn Healey,et al.  Models and methods for automated material identification in hyperspectral imagery acquired under unknown illumination and atmospheric conditions , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Derek Rogge,et al.  Integration of spatial–spectral information for the improved extraction of endmembers , 2007 .

[6]  S. J. Sutley,et al.  Ground-truthing AVIRIS mineral mapping at Cuprite, Nevada , 1992 .

[7]  Jessica A. Faust,et al.  Imaging Spectroscopy and the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) , 1998 .

[8]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Cluster versus GPU implementation of an Orthogonal Target Detection Algorithm for Remotely Sensed Hyperspectral Images , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing.

[9]  David W. Messinger,et al.  Spectral image complexity estimated through local convex hull volume , 2010, 2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing.

[10]  N. Keshava,et al.  Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Robert A. Neville,et al.  Spectral unmixing of hyperspectral imagery for mineral exploration: comparison of results from SFSI and AVIRIS , 2003 .

[12]  A F Goetz,et al.  Imaging Spectrometry for Earth Remote Sensing , 1985, Science.

[13]  John F. Mustard,et al.  Spectral unmixing , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[14]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  P. Jarecke,et al.  Overview of the Hyperion Imaging Spectrometer for the NASA EO-1 mission , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[16]  J. Settle,et al.  Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions , 1993 .

[17]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Region-Based Spatial Preprocessing for Endmember Extraction and Spectral Unmixing , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[18]  Qian Du,et al.  A joint band prioritization and band-decorrelation approach to band selection for hyperspectral image classification , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Vertex component analysis: a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Konstantinos Kalpakis,et al.  Fast Algorithms to Implement N-FINDR for Hyperspectral Endmember Extraction , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Recent Developments in High Performance Computing for Remote Sensing: A Review , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[22]  John A. Antoniades,et al.  Use of filter vectors in hyperspectral data analysis , 1995, Optics & Photonics.

[23]  Benoit Rivard,et al.  The Successive Projection Algorithm (SPA), an Algorithm with a Spatial Constraint for the Automatic Search of Endmembers in Hyperspectral Data , 2008, Sensors.

[24]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  John R. Miller,et al.  Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture , 2004 .

[26]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  J. Boardman,et al.  Mapping target signatures via partial unmixing of AVIRIS data: in Summaries , 1995 .

[28]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Spatial/spectral endmember extraction by multidimensional morphological operations , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  U. Benz,et al.  The EnMAP hyperspectral imager—An advanced optical payload for future applications in Earth observation programmes , 2006 .

[30]  R Muller,et al.  The processing chain and Cal/Val operations of the future hyperspectral satellite mission EnMAP , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[31]  Robert I. Damper,et al.  Band Selection for Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Mutual Information , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[32]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[33]  Bea Thai,et al.  INVARIANT SUBPIXEL MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION IN AVIRIS IMAGERY , 1999 .

[34]  J. Boardman Automating spectral unmixing of AVIRIS data using convex geometry concepts , 1993 .

[35]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Spectral mixture modeling: A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site , 1986 .

[36]  J. C. Price How unique are spectral signatures , 1994 .

[37]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing , 2009 .

[38]  Martin Bachmann,et al.  Including Quality Measures in an Automated Processing Chain for Airborne Hyperspectral Data , 2007 .

[39]  S. J. Sutley,et al.  Imaging spectroscopy: Earth and planetary remote sensing with the USGS Tetracorder and expert systems , 2003 .