Cerebral oxygenation and processed EEG response to clamping and shunting during carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia

Clamping and shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgery causes changes in cerebral blood flow. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare, side by side, the cerebral oxygenation (rSO2) and processed electroencephalogram (EEG) response bilaterally to carotid artery clamping and shunting in patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia. With institutional approval and written informed consent, patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia and routine carotid artery shunting were recorded bilaterally, simultaneously and continuously with an rSO2 and processed EEG monitor. The response of the monitors during carotid artery clamping and shunting were assessed and compared between monitors and bilaterally within each monitor. Sixty-nine patients were included in the study. At clamping the surgical-side and contralateral-side rSO2 dropped significantly below the baseline incision value (−17.6 and −9.4 % respectively). After shunting, the contralateral-side rSO2 returned to baseline while the surgical-side rSO2 remained significantly below baseline (−9.0 %) until the shunt was removed following surgery. At clamping the surgical-side and contralateral-side processed EEG also dropped below baseline (−19.9 and −20.6 % respectively). However, following shunt activation, the processed EEG returned bilaterally to baseline. During the course of this research, we found the rSO2 monitor to be clinically more robust (4.4 % failure rate) than the processed EEG monitor (20.0 % failure rate). There was no correlation between the rSO2 or processed EEG changes that occurred immediately after clamping and the degree of surgical side stenosis measured pre-operatively. Both rSO2 and processed EEG respond to clamping and shunting during CEA. Cerebral oximetry discriminates between the surgical and contralateral side during surgery. The rSO2 monitor is more reliable in the real-world clinical setting. Future studies should focus on developing algorithms based on these monitors that can predict clamping-induced cerebral ischemia during CEA in order to decide whether carotid artery shunting is worth the associated risks. From the practical point of view, the rSO2 monitor may be the better monitor for this purpose.

[1]  P. Rehak,et al.  The Utility of Using the Bispectral Index—Vista for Detecting Cross‐Clamping Decline in Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[2]  M. Wachtel,et al.  Evaluation of an intraoperative algorithm based on near-infrared refracted spectroscopy monitoring, in the intraoperative decision for shunt placement, in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. , 2011, Middle East journal of anaesthesiology.

[3]  D. Barillà,et al.  The sensibility and specificity of cerebral oximetry, measured by INVOS - 4100, in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy compared with awake testing. , 2012, Minerva anestesiologica.

[4]  M. Morales-Suárez-Varela,et al.  Bispectral index changes in carotid surgery. , 2010, Annals of vascular surgery.

[5]  K. Rerkasem,et al.  Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting). , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  R. Emerson,et al.  Bilateral Bispectral Index Monitoring During Suppression of Unilateral Hemispheric Function , 2005, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[7]  L. Pedrini,et al.  Is Near-Infrared Spectroscopy a Reliable Method to Evaluate Clamping Ischemia during Carotid Surgery? , 2011, Stroke research and treatment.

[8]  S. Leichtle,et al.  Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy under general and regional anesthesia from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  M L Bots,et al.  Near-infrared spectroscopy to indicate selective shunt use during carotid endarterectomy. , 2013, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[10]  M. Gough,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy: technical practices of surgeons participating in the GALA trial. , 2008, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[11]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2011, Circulation.

[12]  K. Welch,et al.  Evaluation of a Cerebral Oximeter as a Monitor of Cerebral Ischemia during Carotid Endarterectomy , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[13]  L. Kappelle,et al.  The value of near-infrared spectroscopy measured cerebral oximetry during carotid endarterectomy in perioperative stroke prevention. A review. , 2009, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[14]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2012, Circulation.

[15]  G. Hankey,et al.  Routine or Selective Carotid Artery Shunting for Carotid Endarterectomy (and Different Methods of Monitoring in Selective Shunting) , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  W. Kofke,et al.  Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and stable xenon-enhanced computed tomographic blood flow during balloon test occlusion of the internal carotid artery. , 1995, Stroke.