Physically touching and tasting virtual objects enhances the realism of virtual experiences

Experiment 1 explored the impact of physically touching a virtual object on how realistic the virtual environment (VE) seemed to the user. Subjects in a ‘no touch’ group picked up a 3D virtual image of a kitchen plate in a VE, using a traditional 3D wand. ‘See and touch’ subjects physically picked up a virtual plate possessing solidity and weight, using a technique called ‘tactile augmentation’. Afterwards, subjects made predictions about the properties of other virtual objects they saw but did not interact with in the VE. ‘See and touch’ subjects predicted these objects would be more solid, heavier, and more likely to obey gravity than the ‘no touch’ group. In Experiment 2 (a pilot study), subjects ‘physically bit’ a chocolate bar in one condition, and ‘imagined biting’ a chocolate bar in another condition. Subjects rated the event more fun and realistic when allowed to physically bite the chocolate bar. Results of the two experiments converge with a growing literature showing the value of adding physical qualities to virtual objects. This study is the first to empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of tactile augmentation as a simple, safe, inexpensive technique with large freedom of motion for adding physical texture, force feedback cues, smell and taste to virtual objects. Examples of practical applications are discussed.

[1]  G. Leonard Burns,et al.  Hypnosis for the treatment of burn pain. , 1992, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

[2]  S. Perry,et al.  Assessment of Pain by Burn Patients , 1981 .

[3]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Towards Quantifying Depth and Size Perception in Virtual Environments , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  C. Warfield,et al.  The measurement of pain. , 1988, Hospital practice.

[5]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  C. Chapman,et al.  Hypnotic analgesia: a constructivist framework. , 1998, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[7]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Virtual Reality , 1991 .

[8]  S. Weghorst,et al.  Virtual reality and tactile augmentation in the treatment of spider phobia: a case report. , 1997, Behaviour research and therapy.

[9]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Comments on the Use of Olfactory Displays for Virtual Environments , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Warren Robinett,et al.  A Computational Model for the Stereoscopic Optics of a Head-Mounted Display , 1991, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Project GROPEHaptic displays for scientific visualization , 1990, SIGGRAPH.

[12]  Hunter G. Hoffman,et al.  Physically touching virtual objects using tactile augmentation enhances the realism of virtual environments , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180).

[13]  Carl Machover,et al.  Virtual reality , 1994, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[14]  J J Everett,et al.  Hypnosis for the treatment of burn pain. , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[15]  D. Patterson,et al.  Lorazepam as an adjunct to opioid analgesics in the treatment of burn pain , 1997, Pain.

[16]  H.G. Hoffman,et al.  Virtual-reality monitoring , 1995, Proceedings Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95.

[17]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality , 1996 .

[18]  Steve Mirsky The noses have it , 1995 .

[19]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[20]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Effects of aging on source monitoring: differences in susceptibility to false fame. , 1990, Psychology and aging.

[21]  Hunter G. Hoffman,et al.  Virtual Chess: Meaning Enhances Users' Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  Morton Leonard Heilig,et al.  EL Cine del Futuro: The Cinema of the Future , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[23]  A. Gift,et al.  Visual Analogue Scales: Measurement of Subjective Phenomena , 1989, Nursing research.

[24]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Interactive advertising: patterns of use and effectiveness , 1998, CHI.

[25]  J. Richardson,et al.  Cognition and olfaction: a review. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  S N Roscoe Judgments of Size and Distance with Imaging Displays , 1984, Human factors.

[27]  Thomas C. Meyer,et al.  Presence as the Defining Factor in a VR Application , 1994 .

[28]  Paul Richard,et al.  Multimodal virtual reality: Input-output devices, system integration, and human factors , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  E. Huskisson Measurement of pain. , 1974, Lancet.