Generations of interdisciplinarity in bioinformatics

Bioinformatics, a specialism propelled into relevance by the Human Genome Project and the subsequent -omic turn in the life science, is an interdisciplinary field of research. Qualitative work on the disciplinary identities of bioinformaticians has revealed the tensions involved in work in this “borderland.” As part of our ongoing work on the emergence of bioinformatics, between 2010 and 2011, we conducted a survey of United Kingdom-based academic bioinformaticians. Building on insights drawn from our fieldwork over the past decade, we present results from this survey relevant to a discussion of disciplinary generation and stabilization. Not only is there evidence of an attitudinal divide between the different disciplinary cultures that make up bioinformatics, but there are distinctions between the forerunners, founders and the followers; as inter/disciplines mature, they face challenges that are both inter-disciplinary and inter-generational in nature.

[1]  R. Ankeny,et al.  Repertoires: How to Transform a Project into a Research Community. , 2015, Bioscience.

[2]  Luis Reyes-Galindo.  Linking the subcultures of physics: Virtual empiricism and the bonding role of trust , 2014, Social studies of science.

[3]  S. Schaffer.  Enlightenment Brought down to Earth , 2003 .

[4]  Frank Siedlok,et al.  The Organization of Interdisciplinary Research: Modes, Drivers and Barriers , 2014 .

[5]  S. Gee.  Collaboration in the New Life Sciences , 2011 .

[6]  Jennifer Nacht.  Big Science The Growth Of Large Scale Research , 2016 .

[7]  R. Perrucci,et al.  From Little Science to Big Science , 2017 .

[8]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[9]  Peter A. Chow-White,et al.  Bidirectional Shaping and Spaces of Convergence , 2012 .

[10]  Jane Calvert,et al.  Disciplinary baptisms: a comparison of the naming stories of genetics, molecular biology, genomics, and systems biology. , 2007, History and philosophy of the life sciences.

[11]  R. Smith,et al.  Missed Miracles and Mystical Connections: Qualitative Research, Digital Social Science and Big Data , 2014 .

[12]  Understanding the Human Genome Project: a biographical approach , 2008 .

[13]  Niki Vermeulen,et al.  Supersizing Science: On Building Large-Scale Research Projects in Biology , 2010 .

[14]  Georgina Born,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences , 2013 .

[15]  P. Abir-Am.  Themes, Genres and Orders of Legitimation in the Consolidation of New Scientific Disciplines: Deconstructing the Historiography of Molecular Biology , 1985, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching.

[16]  Peter Grant,et al.  Statistics for Real-Life Sample Surveys: Non-Simple-Random Samples and Weighted Data , 2006 .

[17]  N. Vermeulen.  From Darwin to the Census of Marine Life: Marine Biology as Big Science , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  Staffan Müller-Wille,et al.  Natural history and information overload: The case of Linnaeus , 2012, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[19]  Ayelet Kuper,et al.  Interdisciplinary promises versus practices in medicine: the decoupled experiences of social sciences and humanities scholars. , 2015, Social science & medicine.

[20]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study , 2016 .

[21]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  Hidden in the Middle: Culture, Value and Reward in Bioinformatics , 2016, Minerva.

[22]  Andrew Bartlett,et al.  Accomplishing sequencing the human genome , 2008 .

[23]  Stephen Hilgartner,et al.  Constituting large-scale biology: Building a regime of governance in the early years of the Human Genome Project , 2013 .

[24]  Torsten Werner,et al.  Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research , 1993 .

[25]  Andrew Bartlett,et al.  Inscribing a discipline: tensions in the field of bioinformatics , 2013 .

[26]  Christos A. Ouzounis,et al.  Rise and Demise of Bioinformatics? Promise and Progress , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Stephanie E. Hampton,et al.  Collaboration and Productivity in Scientific Synthesis , 2011 .

[28]  Ralph E. Hoffman,et al.  The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome , 1996 .

[29]  Heidi Ledford.  Cyberinfrastructure: Feed me data , 2009, Nature.

[30]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[31]  S. Shapin.  The Invisible Technician , 1989 .

[32]  Tiago Moreira,et al.  Structures of Scientific Collaboration , 2009 .

[33]  John Urry,et al.  The Complexities of the Global , 2005 .

[34]  W. Jager,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods , 2016 .

[35]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  What is Authorship, and What Should it Be? A Survey of Prominent Guidelines for Determining Authorship in Scientific Publications. , 2009 .

[36]  Genomics research in the UK—the social science agenda , 2005, New genetics and society.

[37]  Kathryn M. Jones,et al.  Biology, Computing, and the History of Molecular Sequencing: From Proteins to DNA, 1945–2000 , 2017 .

[38]  D. Fitzgerald,et al.  Rethinking Interdisciplinarity across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences , 2015 .

[39]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  The Doctoral Experience; Success and Failure in Graduate School , 1999 .

[40]  Martin Hand,et al.  Big Data? Qualitative Approaches to Digital Research , 2014 .

[41]  Javier Solana,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Work, Live and Think , 2014 .

[42]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  Trajectories of Collaboration and Competition in a Medical Discovery , 1998 .

[43]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World , 2014 .

[44]  K. K. Cetina.  Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge , 1999 .

[45]  Miguel García-Sancho,et al.  Biology, Computing, and the History of Molecular Sequencing , 2012 .

[46]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[47]  Pedro C Marijuán,et al.  Bionformation: untangling the networks of life. , 2002, Bio Systems.

[48]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Cultural Competence in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: A Method for Respecting Diversity in Research Partnerships , 2006, American journal of community psychology.

[49]  Molly Hartzog,et al.  Life Out of Sequence: A Data-Driven History of Bioinformatics , 2014 .

[50]  Viktor Mayer-Schnberger,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2013 .

[51]  Harold Maurice Collins,et al.  Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge , 2004 .

[52]  Marilyn Strathern,et al.  A community of critics? Thoughts on new knowledge* , 2006 .

[53]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  Early bioinformatics: the birth of a discipline - a personal view , 2003, Bioinform..

[54]  A. Bartlett,et al.  Sociological Ambivalence and the Order of Scientific Knowledge , 2014 .

[55]  S. Franklin.  Postmodern procreation: Representing reproductive practice , 1993 .

[56]  D. Roos,et al.  Bioinformatics--Trying to Swim in a Sea of Data , 2001, Science.

[57]  M. Stember,et al.  Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise , 1991 .

[58]  Harold Maurice Collins,et al.  Tacit Knowledge, Trust and the Q of Sapphire , 2001 .

[59]  Emma Uprichard,et al.  Focus : big data, little questions? , 2013 .

[60]  S. Freytag.  Image And Logic A Material Culture Of Microphysics , 2016 .

[61]  Edna Suárez-Díaz,et al.  Making room for new faces: evolution, genomics and the growth of bioinformatics. , 2010, History and philosophy of the life sciences.

[62]  Assistants to enlightenment: William Lewis, Alexander Chisholm and invisible technicians in the Industrial Revolution , 2008, Notes and Records of the Royal Society.

[63]  Laura Meagher,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research Journeys: Practical Strategies for Capturing Creativity , 2011 .

[64]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative STS: The Intellectual and Practical Contributions of Scientometrics , 2015 .

[65]  Eric Gossett,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2015 .

[66]  J. Ben-David,et al.  Social factors in the origins of a new science: the case of psychology. , 1966, American sociological review.

[67]  J. Holmwood.  Sociology's misfortune: disciplines, interdisciplinarity and the impact of audit culture. , 2010, The British journal of sociology.

[68]  Hallam Stevens,et al.  On the means of bio-production: Bioinformatics and how to make knowledge in a high-throughput genomics laboratory , 2011 .

[69]  E. Aronova,et al.  Big Science and Big Data in Biology: From the International Geophysical Year through the International Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, 1957––Present , 2010 .

[70]  T. Lenoir.  Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines , 1997 .

[71]  B. Penders,et al.  Walking the Line between Lab and Computation: The “Moist” Zone , 2008 .

[72]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science , 2002 .

[73]  F. Collins,et al.  The Human Genome Project: Lessons from Large-Scale Biology , 2003, Science.

[74]  R. Stichweh.  The Sociology of Scientific Disciplines: On the Genesis and Stability of the Disciplinary Structure of Modern Science , 1992, Science in Context.

[75]  B. Strasser,et al.  Collecting, Comparing, and Computing Sequences: The Making of Margaret O. Dayhoff’s Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, 1954–1965 , 2010, Journal of the history of biology.

[76]  M. G. Khan,et al.  Statistics for Real-Life Sample Surveys: Non-Simple-Random Samples and Weighted Data , 2008 .

[77]  Marie Wiberg,et al.  Implications of range restriction : a comparison of two approaches for correcting correlation in range restriction. , 2009 .

[78]  N. Vermeulen,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer Systems biology, interdisciplinarity and disciplinary identity , 2013 .

[79]  I. Meyer,et al.  Sampling Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations. , 2009 .

[80]  Marilyn Strathern,et al.  Commons and borderlands : working papers on interdisciplinarity, accountability and the flow of knowledge , 2004 .