Processing ambiguous verbs: evidence from eye movements.

: In 2 eye-tracking experiments, participants read verbs that had 2 (unrelated) meanings or 2 (related) senses in contexts that disambiguated before or after the verb, to the dominant or subordinate interpretation. A 3rd experiment used unambiguous verbs. The results indicated that the language processor used information about context in the early stages of resolving meaning ambiguities but only during integration for sense ambiguities. Effects of preference were delayed for both types of verbs. The results contrast with findings concerning the processing of nouns (e.g., K. Rayner & S. A. Duffy, 1986). For meaning ambiguities, the authors argue that delays in resolution allow both meanings to reach a high level of activation, thus reducing effects of frequency. For sense ambiguities, the authors argue that the processor does not access multiple senses but activates one underspecified meaning and uses context to home in on the appropriate sense.

[1]  J. Engelkamp,et al.  Differential memory effects of concrete nouns and action verbs , 1990, 1990.

[2]  J. Engelkamp.  Memory for performed and imaged noun pairs and verb pairs , 1989 .

[3]  M. MacDonald,et al.  Pragmatic constraint on the interpretation of complex noun phrases in Spanish and English. , 1999 .

[4]  Gibbs,et al.  Figurative thought and figurative language. , 1994 .

[5]  K. Rayner.  Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[6]  I. Fischler,et al.  Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[7]  R. Berndt,et al.  Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia , 1990, Brain and Language.

[8]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[9]  B. McElree,et al.  Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Semantic Factors in Verb Retrieval: An Effect of Complexity , 1998, Brain and Language.

[11]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[12]  Katherine S. Binder,et al.  Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye fixations and self-paced reading , 1998 .

[13]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Implications of Lexical Ambiguity Resolution for Word Recognition and Comprehension , 1988 .

[15]  T. Helstrup,et al.  Memory for performed and imaged noun pairs and verb pairs , 1989 .

[16]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading , 1988 .

[17]  Susan A. Duffy,et al.  Effects of Prior Encounter and Global Discourse Bias on the Processing of Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence From Eye Fixations , 1994 .

[18]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes , 1989 .

[19]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: a cross-linguistic study , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[20]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child , 1988 .

[21]  P. Tabossi,et al.  Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance , 1987 .

[22]  K. Rayner,et al.  The psychology of reading , 1989 .

[23]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts. , 1979 .

[24]  T. Tardif.  Nouns are not always learned before verbs : Evidence from Mandarin speakers' early vocabularies , 1996 .

[25]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[26]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Differential productivity in young children's use of nouns and verbs , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[27]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[28]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  K. Rayner,et al.  The Effect of Meaning Frequency on Processing Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence from Eye Fixations , 1992 .

[30]  A. Caramazza,et al.  On the Basis for the Agrammatic's Difficulty in Producing Main Verbs , 1984, Cortex.

[31]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding old words with new meanings , 1983 .

[32]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses ☆ , 1990 .

[33]  K. Rayner,et al.  Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences☆ , 1987 .

[34]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  S. D. Lima,et al.  Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[36]  P. Tabossi.  Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts , 1988 .

[37]  G. Simpson,et al.  Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context , 1991 .

[38]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach , 1989, Language and Cognitive Processes.

[39]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  The Lexicon in Acquisition , 1996 .

[40]  K. Rayner,et al.  Contextual Strength and the Subordinate Bias Effect: Comment on Martin, Vu, Kellas, and Metcalf , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[41]  A Caramazza,et al.  Deficits in lexical and semantic processing: Implications for models of normal language , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  M. MacDonald.  The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity , 1993 .

[43]  R. Gerrig,et al.  The time course of sense creation , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Helen Moss,et al.  Birkbeck Word Association Norms , 1996 .

[45]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Some interesting differences between nouns and verbs , 1981 .

[46]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Recognition memory for elements of sentences , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[47]  K Rayner,et al.  The processing of homophonic homographs during reading: Evidence from eye movement studies , 1993, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[48]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  G. Murphy,et al.  Metaphoric reference: When metaphors are not understood as easily as literal expressions , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[50]  Patrizia Tabossi,et al.  Processing Ambiguous Words in Context , 1993 .

[51]  G Kellas,et al.  Strength of context does modulate the subordinate bias effect: A reply to Binder and Rayner , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Comprehending figurative referential descriptions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Lexical ambiguity resolution , 1987 .

[54]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  The Verb Mutability Effect: Studies of the Combinatorial Semantics of Nouns and Verbs , 1990 .

[55]  D. Geeraerts.  Vagueness's puzzles, polysemy's vagaries , 1993 .

[56]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  C. Semenza,et al.  Morphological representation of compound nouns: A study on Italian aphasic patients , 1997, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[58]  G. Kellas,et al.  Strength of Discourse Context as a Determinant of the Subordinate Bias Effect , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[59]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[60]  R. Jonkers,et al.  Verb retrieval in action naming and spontaneous speech in agrammatic and anomic aphasia , 1998 .