Visual Assessment of Density in Digital Mammograms

This study compares visual assessment of density on full field digital mammograms using visual analogue scales (VAS) and written percentages Fifty normal digital screening mammograms were selected at random Nine readers viewed the images on two occasions, firstly indicating density on a VAS and then estimating the percentage of dense tissue in the breast Although the two methods were correlated, the degree of agreement between the density estimates varied considerably from reader to reader More experienced readers used a wider range of values, and inter-observer variability for both methods was higher for these readers The greatest difference between the methods was in mammograms with a mixed fatty-glandular appearance (density between 55% and 75%) Both methods are quick and convenient, although these results demonstrate a need for training to ensure they are used consistently by readers of different degrees of experience.

[1]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[2]  J. Wolfe.  Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern , 1976, Cancer.

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[4]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[6]  J. Kaufhold,et al.  A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[7]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Automated Breast Tissue Measurement of Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[8]  Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF) , 2006 .

[9]  Helen Warren-Forward,et al.  Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  Mary Wilson,et al.  Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[11]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Quantifying Breast Thickness for Density Measurement , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[12]  S. Astley,et al.  Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Norman Boyd,et al.  Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk: Evaluation of a Novel Method of Measuring Breast Tissue Volumes , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.