Optimization of Sm3+ fluorescence in Sm-doped yttrium aluminum garnet: Application to pressure calibration in diamond-anvil cell at high temperature

Sm3+ concentration in Sm-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Sm3+:YAG) has been optimized for fluorescence yield and synthesis procedure for the production of strain-free small grain-size powder established. Concentration of 0.5 wt % Sm3+ displays an optimal fluorescence signal, three to five times stronger than the generally proposed concentration (4 wt %). The fluorescence of the samples has been studied as a function of temperature (300–873 K) and pressure (0–15 GPa). A comparison with standard pressure scales shows that the pressure evolution of Sm3+:YAG fluorescence is insensitive to the doping rate, and that temperature has only a limited effect on the pressure scale established at 300 K. The present results indicate that pressure can be determined from the Y1 line of 0.5 wt % Sm-doped YAG, with temperature correction for ϖ at room pressure and constant pressure shift, within the 300–873 K and 10−4−15 GPa pressure-temperature range, through the linear relation: P (GPa)=0.127×[(ϖ0−0.018×ΔT)−ϖ] where ϖ0 co...

[1]  M. Aziz,et al.  Pressure measurement at high temperature using ten Sm:YAG fluorescence peaks , 1998 .

[2]  K. Lebbou,et al.  Elaboration of Tl0.5Pb0.5Sr2CaCu2Ox Superconducting Phases By an Ultrasonic Spray–Pyrolysis Process , 1998 .

[3]  P. Loubeyre,et al.  Improved calibration of the SrB4O7:Sm2+ optical pressure gauge: Advantages at very high pressures and high temperatures , 1997 .

[4]  J. Chervin,et al.  A diamond anvil cell for IR microspectroscopy , 1995 .

[5]  T. Yagi,et al.  Pressure dependence of Sm:YAG fluorescence to 50 GPa: A new calibration as a high pressure scale , 1994 .

[6]  N. Hess,et al.  Comparison of the pressure‐induced frequency shift of Sm:YAG to the ruby and nitrogen vibron pressure scales from 6 to 820 K and 0 to 25 GPa and suggestions for use as a high‐temperature pressure calibrant , 1992 .

[7]  Q. Bi,et al.  Calibration of Sm:YAG as an alternate high‐pressure scale , 1990 .

[8]  J. Leger,et al.  SrB4O7 : Sm2+ pressure optical sensor : investigations in the megabar range , 1990 .

[9]  N. Hess,et al.  Pressure and temperature dependence of laser‐induced fluorescence of Sm:YAG to 100 kbar and 700 °C and an empirical model , 1990 .

[10]  A. Lacam The SrB4O7:Sm2+ optical sensor and the pressure homogeneization through thermal cycles in diamond anvil cells , 1990 .

[11]  G. Exarhos,et al.  Temperature and pressure dependence of laser induced fluorescence in Sm:YAG—a new pressure calibrant , 1989 .

[12]  C. Chateau,et al.  High‐pressure measurements at moderate temperatures in a diamond anvil cell with a new optical sensor: SrB4O7:Sm2+ , 1989 .

[13]  H. Mao,et al.  High-Pressure Ruby and Diamond Fluorescence: Observations at 0.21 to 0.55 Terapascal , 1986, Science.

[14]  Peter M. Bell,et al.  Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi‐hydrostatic conditions , 1986 .

[15]  Stanley Block,et al.  Calibration of the pressure dependence of the R1 ruby fluorescence line to 195 kbar , 1975 .

[16]  Stanley Block,et al.  Hydrostatic limits in liquids and solids to 100 kbar , 1973 .

[17]  Stanley Block,et al.  An Optical Fluorescence System for Quantitative Pressure Measurement in the Diamond‐Anvil Cell , 1973 .