Structural basis of CRISPR–SpyCas9 inhibition by an anti-CRISPR protein

CRISPR–Cas9 systems are bacterial adaptive immune systems that defend against infection by phages. Through the RNA-guided endonuclease activity of Cas9 they degrade double-stranded DNA with a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) and sequences complementary to the guide RNA. Recently, two anti-CRISPR proteins (AcrIIA2 and AcrIIA4 from Listeria monocytogenes prophages) were identified, both of which inhibit Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpyCas9) and L. monocytogenes Cas9 activity in bacteria and human cells. However, the mechanism of AcrIIA2- or AcrIIA4-mediated Cas9 inhibition remains unknown. Here we report a crystal structure of SpyCas9 in complex with a single-guide RNA (sgRNA) and AcrIIA4. Our data show that AcrIIA2 and AcrIIA4 interact with SpyCas9 in a sgRNA-dependent manner. The structure reveals that AcrIIA4 inhibits SpyCas9 activity by structurally mimicking the PAM to occupy the PAM-interacting site in the PAM-interacting domain, thereby blocking recognition of double-stranded DNA substrates by SpyCas9. AcrIIA4 further inhibits the endonuclease activity of SpyCas9 by shielding its RuvC active site. Structural comparison reveals that formation of the AcrIIA4-binding site of SpyCas9 is induced by sgRNA binding. Our study reveals the mechanism of SpyCas9 inhibition by AcrIIA4, providing a structural basis for developing ‘off-switch’ tools for SpyCas9 to avoid unwanted genome edits within cells and tissues.

[1]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  Randy J Read,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Phenix: Building New Software for Automated Crystallographic Structure Determination Biological Crystallography Phenix: Building New Software for Automated Crystallographic Structure Determination , 2022 .

[3]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[4]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Phaser crystallographic software , 2007, Journal of applied crystallography.

[5]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  CRISPR-based adaptive and heritable immunity in prokaryotes. , 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[6]  R. Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR/Cas, the Immune System of Bacteria and Archaea , 2010, Science.

[7]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  The CRISPRs, they are a-changin': how prokaryotes generate adaptive immunity. , 2012, Annual review of genetics.

[8]  R. Barrangou,et al.  Cas9–crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[10]  J. Doudna,et al.  RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea , 2012, Nature.

[11]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  David R. Liu,et al.  High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  Rotem Sorek,et al.  CRISPR-mediated adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea. , 2013, Annual review of biochemistry.

[14]  M. Jinek,et al.  Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease , 2014, Nature.

[15]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Rodolphe Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR-Cas systems: Prokaryotes upgrade to adaptive immunity. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[17]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Structures of Cas9 Endonucleases Reveal RNA-Mediated Conformational Activation , 2014, Science.

[18]  Min Zhang,et al.  Somatic mosaicism and allele complexity induced by CRISPR/Cas9 RNA injections in mouse zygotes. , 2014, Developmental biology.

[19]  E. Lander,et al.  Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering , 2014, Cell.

[20]  Luciano A. Marraffini,et al.  CRISPR-Cas immunity in prokaryotes , 2015, Nature.

[21]  Samuel H Sternberg,et al.  Rational design of a split-Cas9 enzyme complex , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Yuta Nihongaki,et al.  Photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9 for optogenetic genome editing , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Sita J. Saunders,et al.  An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[24]  D. Durocher,et al.  A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells , 2015, Nature.

[25]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  A Cas9–guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition , 2015, Science.

[26]  Wenyan Jiang,et al.  CRISPR-Cas: New Tools for Genetic Manipulations from Bacterial Immunity Systems. , 2015, Annual review of microbiology.

[27]  J. Doudna,et al.  Expanding the Biologist's Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[28]  Hiroshi Nishimasu.  Crystal Structure of Cas9 , 2015 .

[29]  Alan R. Davidson,et al.  Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR–Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR proteins , 2015, Nature.

[30]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Naturally Occurring Off-Switches for CRISPR-Cas9 , 2016, Cell.

[31]  Lucas B. Harrington,et al.  Chemical and Biophysical Modulation of Cas9 for Tunable Genome Engineering. , 2016, ACS chemical biology.

[32]  G. Lander,et al.  Structure Reveals Mechanisms of Viral Suppressors that Intercept a CRISPR RNA-Guided Surveillance Complex , 2017, Cell.

[33]  Nevan J. Krogan,et al.  Inhibition of CRISPR-Cas9 with Bacteriophage Proteins , 2017, Cell.

[34]  E. Miao,et al.  Programmed cell death as a defence against infection , 2017, Nature Reviews Immunology.