Bodily experience and imagination: designing ritual interactions for participatory live-art contexts

We are exploring new possibilities for bodily-focused aesthetic experiences within participatory live-art contexts. As artist-researchers, we are interested in how we can understand and shape bodily experience and imagination as primary components of an interactive aesthetic experience, sonically mediated by digital biofeedback technologies. Through the making of a participatory live-art installation, we illustrate how we used the Bodyweather performance methodology to inform the design of ritual interactions intended to reframe the audience experience of self, body and the world through imaginative processes of scaling and metaphor. We report on the insights into the varieties of audience experience gathered from audience testing of the prototype artwork, with a particular focus on the relationship between the embodied imagination and felt sensation; the influence of objects and costume; and the sonically mediated experience of physiological processes of breathing and heartbeat. We offer some reflections on the use of ritual and scripted interactions as a strategy for facilitating coherent forms of bodily experience.

[1]  David Rosenboom,et al.  Biofeedback and the Arts: Results of Early Experiments , 1989 .

[2]  Ernest A. Edmonds,et al.  The art of interaction , 2010, Digit. Creativity.

[3]  Peter Snow P4: Performance Making in Alice , 2003 .

[4]  Sally O'Reilly,et al.  The Body in Contemporary Art , 2009 .

[5]  Susan Kozel,et al.  Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology , 2007 .

[6]  Lian Loke,et al.  Surging verticality: an experience of balance , 2011, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[7]  Thecla Schiphorst,et al.  Between Bodies: using Experience Modeling to Create Gestural Protocols for Physiological Data Transfer , 2004 .

[8]  George Poonkhin Khut,et al.  Evolving creative practice: a reflection on working with audience experience in Cardiomorphologies , 2005 .

[9]  J. Dewey Art as Experience , 1934 .

[10]  David Rokeby Transforming Mirrors: Subjectivity and Control in Interactive Media , 1995 .

[11]  E. Edmonds,et al.  Living laboratories for interactive art , 2006 .

[12]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art , 2003, CHI '03.

[13]  Lone Koefoed Hansen,et al.  Embodied imagination: a hybrid method of designing for intimacy , 2007, Digit. Creativity.

[14]  Todd Winkler Participation and Response in Movement-Sensing Installations , 2000, ICMC.

[15]  E. Goffman Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[16]  Brigid Costello,et al.  Collaborative analysis framework for evaluating interactive art experience , 2006 .

[17]  Thecla Schiphorst,et al.  Self-evidence: applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  V. Turner From ritual to theatre : the human seriousness of play , 1986 .

[19]  Simone Osthoff,et al.  Lygia Clark and Hélio Oiticica: A Legacy of Interactivity and Participation for a Telematic Future , 2017 .

[20]  W. Davis,et al.  What Is Art For , 1990 .

[21]  Celine Latulipe,et al.  Love, hate, arousal and engagement: exploring audience responses to performing arts , 2011, CHI.

[22]  Simon Penny,et al.  Critical Issues in Electronic Media , 1995 .

[23]  Trevor Whittock Performing Live: Aesthetic Alternatives for the Ends of Art , 2002 .