Understanding customer reactions to brokered ultimatums: applying negotiation and justice theory.

There has been little research examining customer reactions to brokered ultimatum game (BUG) contexts (i.e. exchanges in which 1 party offers an ultimatum price for a resource through an intermediary, and the ultimatum offer is accepted or rejected by the other party). In this study, the authors incorporated rational decision-making theory and justice theory to examine how customers' bids, recommendations, and repatronage behavior are affected by characteristics of BUG contexts (changing from an ultimatum to negotiation transaction, response timeliness, and offer acceptance or rejection). Results indicated that customers attempt to be economically efficient with their bidding behavior. However, negotiation structures, long waits for a response, and rejected bids create injustice perceptions (particularly informational and distributive injustice), negatively influencing customers' recommendations to others and their repatronage. The authors then discuss the practical and theoretical implications of their results.

[1]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[2]  J. Stanton.  AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF DATA COLLECTION USING THE INTERNET , 1998 .

[3]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Customer Perceptions of Corporate Responses to Product Complaints: The Role of Explanations , 1996 .

[4]  Madan M. Pillutla,et al.  BEING FAIR OR APPEARING FAIR: STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR IN ULTIMATUM BARGAINING , 1995 .

[5]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  The Dissatisfaction of Having Your First Offer Accepted: The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Negotiations , 2002 .

[6]  Kathleen M. O'Connor,et al.  Tough guys finish last: the perils of a distributive reputation ☆ , 2002 .

[7]  G. Leventhal.  What Should Be Done with Equity Theory , 1980 .

[8]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[9]  Deborah E. Rupp,et al.  Three roads to organizational justice , 2001 .

[10]  Alexander D. Stajkovic,et al.  Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[11]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[12]  J. Greenberg,et al.  The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. , 1993 .

[13]  Russell Cropanzano,et al.  Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management. , 1993 .

[14]  J. Keith Murnighan,et al.  Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults , 1998 .

[15]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[17]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Stephen S. Tax,et al.  The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior , 1997 .

[19]  J. Colquitt.  On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Chivalry and Solidarity in Ultimatum Games , 2001 .

[21]  J. Kagel,et al.  The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Comment , 1999 .

[22]  M. Quiñones.  Pretraining context effects: Training assignment as feedback. , 1995 .

[23]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[24]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Influence : how and why people agree to things , 1985 .

[25]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Jeffrey Blodgett,et al.  The effects of perceived justice on complainants' negative word-of-mouth behavior and repatronage intentions , 1993 .

[27]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[28]  G. Leventhal.  What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships. , 1976 .

[29]  J. Kagel,et al.  Tests of Fairness Models Based on Equity Considerations in a Three-Person Ultimatum Game , 2001 .

[30]  M. Birnbaum.  Testing Critical Properties of Decision Making on the Internet , 1999 .

[31]  R. Bies.  Interactional justice : communication criteria of fairness , 1986 .

[32]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[33]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Judgment and decision-making theory. , 1990 .

[34]  R. H. Willis,et al.  Social Exchange: Advances In Theory And Research , 1981 .

[35]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[36]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. , 1982 .

[37]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Research in the Psychological Laboratory , 1999 .

[38]  Sheryl B. Ball,et al.  An evaluation of learning in the bilateral winner's curse , 1991 .

[39]  Michel J. J. Handgraaf,et al.  The salience of a recipient’s alternatives: Inter- and intrapersonal comparison in ultimatum games , 2003 .

[40]  Stuart S. Nagel,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[41]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness and Interpersonal Conflict , 1992 .

[42]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Strategic delegation : An experiment , 2001 .

[43]  M. Bazerman.  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[44]  J. Rubin,et al.  Negotiation , 1983 .

[45]  L. Thompson,et al.  The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator , 1997 .

[46]  Robert L. Desatnick,et al.  Managing to keep the customer , 1992 .

[47]  Paul T. P. Wong,et al.  When people ask "why" questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. , 1981 .

[48]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[49]  R. Lewicki.  Research on Negotiation in Organizations , 1990 .