Combining EGM2008 and SRTM/DTM2006.0 residual terrain model data to improve quasigeoid computations in mountainous areas devoid of gravity data

A global geopotential model, like EGM2008, is not capable of representing the high-frequency components of Earth’s gravity field. This is known as the omission error. In mountainous terrain, omission errors in EGM2008, even when expanded to degree 2,190, may reach amplitudes of 10 cm and more for height anomalies. The present paper proposes the utilisation of high-resolution residual terrain model (RTM) data for computing estimates of the omission error in rugged terrain. RTM elevations may be constructed as the difference between the SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) elevation model and the DTM2006.0 spherical harmonic topographic expansion. Numerical tests, carried out in the German Alps with a precise gravimetric quasigeoid model (GCG05) and GPS/levelling data as references, demonstrate that RTM-based omission error estimates improve EGM2008 height anomaly differences by 10 cm in many cases. The comparisons of EGM2008-only height anomalies and the GCG05 model showed 3.7 cm standard deviation after a bias-fit. Applying RTM omission error estimates to EGM2008 reduces the standard deviation to 1.9 cm which equates to a significant improvement rate of 47%. Using GPS/levelling data strongly corroborates these findings with an improvement rate of 49%. The proposed RTM approach may be of practical value to improve quasigeoid determination in mountainous areas without sufficient regional gravity data coverage, e.g., in parts of Asia, South America or Africa. As a further application, RTM omission error estimates will allow refined validation of global gravity field models like EGM2008 from GPS/levelling data.

[1]  C. C. Tscherning,et al.  The use of height data in gravity field approximation by collocation , 1981 .

[2]  Christopher Jekeli,et al.  Evaluation of EGM08 - globally, and locally in South Korea , 2009 .

[3]  S. Kenyon,et al.  Results of EGM08 geopotential model testing and its comparison with EGM96 , 2009 .

[4]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  Terrain-Related Gravimetric Quantities Computed for the Next EGM , 2006 .

[5]  Reiner Rummel,et al.  Comparisons of global topographic/isostatic models to the Earth's observed gravity field , 1988 .

[6]  Thomas A. Hennig,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2001, Digital Earth Moving.

[7]  Christopher Jekeli,et al.  Geometric Reference Systems in Geodesy , 2006 .

[8]  W. Featherstone,et al.  Is Australian Data Really Validating EGM2008, or Is EGM2008 Just in/Validating Australian Data? , 2010 .

[9]  Christian Hirt,et al.  Prediction of vertical deflections from high-degree spherical harmonic synthesis and residual terrain model data , 2010 .

[10]  Niels Arne Wahl,et al.  Proceedings of the General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union , 2006 .

[11]  Will Featherstone Absolute and relative testing of gravimetric geoid models using Global Positioning System and orthometric height data , 2001 .

[12]  Will Featherstone,et al.  Assessment of EGM2008 in Europe using accurate astrogeodetic vertical deflections and omission error estimates from SRTM/DTM2006.0 residual terrain model data , 2010 .

[13]  Gábor Papp,et al.  The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism , 2000 .

[14]  Andrew Jarvis,et al.  Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4 , 2008 .

[15]  Hannes Isaak Reuter,et al.  An evaluation of void‐filling interpolation methods for SRTM data , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Fernando Sansò,et al.  A Window on the Future of Geodesy , 2005 .

[17]  G. Ramillien Gravity/magnetic potential of uneven shell topography , 2002 .

[18]  W. Featherstone,et al.  On the Optimal Spatial Resolution of Crustal Mass Distributions for Forward Gravity Field Modelling , 2003 .

[19]  Rene Forsberg,et al.  A Study of Terrain Reductions, Density Anomalies and Geophysical Inversion Methods in Gravity Field Modelling , 1984 .

[20]  D. Nagy,et al.  Corrections to “The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism” , 2002 .

[21]  René Forsberg,et al.  Gravity field terrain effect computations by FFT , 1985 .

[22]  Jakob Flury,et al.  Astronomical-topographic levelling using high-precision astrogeodetic vertical deflections and digital terrain model data , 2008 .

[23]  Michael Kuhn,et al.  Comparison of Newton’s Integral in the Space and Frequency Domains , 2005 .

[24]  Schweizerische Geodätische Kommission Geodätisch-Geophysikalische Arbeiten in der Schweiz , 1982 .

[25]  J. Ågren Evaluation of EGM2008 and PGM2007A over Sweden , 2009 .

[26]  Thomas Gruber Evaluation of the EGM2008 gravity field by means of GPS-levelling and sea surface topography solutions , 2009 .