A novel method for archiving multibeam sonar data with emphasis on efficient record size reduction and storage

Abstract Over the past few years considerable advances in sonar technology, spatial positioning capabilities and computer processing power have lead to significant improvements in mapping, imaging and technologies of seafloor exploration. Recently, modern multibeam echosounder systems (MBES) capable of recording backscatter data for the whole water column, not just for the seabed, have become available thus providing data allowing for visualization and analysis of objects other than the seabed such as single fish, fish schools or pollution. Unlike bathymetric sonars, which only capture the seafloor, multibeam systems produce very large amounts of data during surveys. Because of this, storing the data collected during hydrographic or scientific cruises becomes a crucial problem. In this context, the paper proposes a new approach for efficient reduction and storage of MBES records. The results of a sample implementation of the algorithm being tested on several different sets of MBES data are also discussed.

[1]  Dezhang Chu,et al.  Protocols for calibrating multibeam sonar. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  T. Pauly,et al.  Model inversion for midwater multibeam backscatter data analysis , 2005, Europe Oceans 2005.

[3]  Nur A. Touba,et al.  Relationship Between Entropy and Test Data Compression , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[4]  Larry A. Mayer,et al.  3D visualization for pelagic fisheries research and assessment , 2002 .

[5]  G. S. Shah,et al.  A study of enhanced signal processing on multibeam bathymetric data , 1999, Oceans '99. MTS/IEEE. Riding the Crest into the 21st Century. Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37008).

[6]  D. Huffman A Method for the Construction of Minimum-Redundancy Codes , 1952 .

[7]  Marcin Kulawiak,et al.  Web-Based GIS as a Tool for Supporting Marine Research , 2010 .

[8]  M. Richardson,et al.  High-Resolution Mapping of Mines and Ripples at the Martha's Vineyard Coastal Observatory , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[9]  LAWRENCE L. LARMORE Height Restricted Optimal Binary Trees , 1987, SIAM J. Comput..

[10]  J. Scott Ferguson,et al.  Use of a Generic sensor format to store multibeam data , 1995 .

[11]  William J. Fry,et al.  Action of Ultrasound on Nerve Tissue—a Review , 1953 .

[12]  Marek Moszynski,et al.  Compression algorithms for multibeam sonar records , 2008 .

[13]  A. L. Van Buren,et al.  Calibration of Underwater Acoustic Transducers at NRL/USRD , 1989 .

[14]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[15]  J. S. Bird,et al.  Lossless compression of hydroacoustic image data , 1997 .

[16]  M. Morse UNUSUAL ABUNDANCE OF A MYRIAPOD, PARAJULUS PENNSYLVANICUS (BRANDT). , 1903, Science.

[17]  Ahj Sale,et al.  Computational challenges in processing and analysis of full-watercolumn multibeam sonar data. , 2006 .

[18]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communications , 1948 .

[19]  Reza Hashemian Direct Huffman coding and decoding using the table of code-lengths , 2003, Proceedings ITCC 2003. International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing.

[20]  J. E. Thorner Approaches to sonar beamforming , 1990, IEEE Technical Conference on Southern Tier.

[21]  Transient calibration of underwater acoustic transducers , 1998 .

[22]  S. Krishnan,et al.  Comparison of JPEG 2000 and Other Lossless Compression Schemes for Digital Mammograms , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[23]  Are Rønhovde,et al.  High resolution beamforming of SIMRAD EM3000 bathymetric multibeam sonar data , 1999 .

[24]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  From two dimensions to three: the use of multibeam sonar for a new approach in fisheries acoustics , 1999 .

[25]  Y.-W. Chang,et al.  Direct mapping architecture for JPEG Huffman decoder , 2006 .