The Kyoto Protocol and non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sinks

Many trace constituents other than carbon dioxide affect the radiative budget of the atmosphere. The existing international agreement to limit greenhouse gases, the Kyoto Protocol, includes carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) and credit for some carbon sinks. We investigate technological options for reducing emissions of these gases and the economic implications of including other greenhouse gases and sinks in the climate change control policy. We conduct an integreated assessment of costs using the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model combined with estimates of abatement costs for non-CO2 greenhouse gases and sinks. We find that failure to take advantage of the other gas and sink flexibility would nearly double aggregate Annex B costs. Including all the GHGs and sinks is actually cheaper than if only CO2 had been included in the Protocol and their inclusion achieves greater overall abatement. There remains considerable uncertainty in these estimates, the magnitude of the savings depends heavily on reference projections of emissions, for example, but these uncertainties do not change the overall conclusion that non-CO2 GHGs are an important part of a climate control policy.

[1]  E. M. Bailey,et al.  The Market for Sulfur Dioxide Emissions , 1998 .

[2]  W. Sturges,et al.  Growth of fluoroform (CHF3, HFC‐23) in the background atmosphere , 1998 .

[3]  Jean M. Dasch,et al.  Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Vehicles , 1992 .

[4]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Managing The Global Commons , 1994 .

[5]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. , 1996 .

[6]  I. Wing,et al.  Primary Aluminum Production: Climate Policy, Emissions and Costs , 1998 .

[7]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A global interactive chemistry and climate model: Formulation and testing , 1998 .

[8]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  The Uses and Misuses of Technology Development as a Component of Climate Policy , 1998 .

[9]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  CO2 Emissions Limits: Economic Adjustments and the Distribution of Burdens , 1997 .

[10]  Robert C. Harriss,et al.  Model estimates of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural lands in the United States , 1996 .

[11]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations , 1996, Nature.

[12]  José Luis Jiménez-Palacios,et al.  Understanding and quantifying motor vehicle emissions with vehicle specific power and TILDAS remote sensing , 1999 .

[13]  W. Trogler,et al.  Nylon Production: An Unknown Source of Atmospheric Nitrous Oxide , 1991, Science.

[14]  M. Denbaly,et al.  Dynamic Fertilizer Nutrient Demands for Corn: A Cointegrated and Error-Correcting System , 1993 .

[15]  Derek M. Cunnold,et al.  Atmospheric emissions and trends of nitrous oxide deduced from 10 years of ALE–GAGE data , 1990 .

[16]  Sten Nilsson,et al.  The carbon-sequestration potential of a global afforestation program , 1995 .

[17]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Japanese nuclear power and the Kyoto agreement , 2000 .

[18]  A. Manne,et al.  C02 Emission Limits: An Economic Cost Analysis for the USA , 1990 .

[19]  J. Melillo,et al.  Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol , 1999, Nature.

[20]  A. Bouwman,et al.  Uncertainties in the global source distribution of nitrous oxide , 1995 .

[21]  G. Watts,et al.  Climate Change 1995 , 1998 .

[22]  A. V. Amstel,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emission Accounting , 1999 .

[23]  Roger A. Sedjo.  Conference on global change: Economic issues in agriculture, forestry and natural resources: Washington, DC, 19–21 November 1990 , 1991 .