Probability of Seeing Increases Saccadic Readiness

Associating movement directions or endpoints with monetary rewards or costs influences movement parameters in humans, and associating movement directions or endpoints with food reward influences movement parameters in non-human primates. Rewarded movements are facilitated relative to non-rewarded movements. The present study examined to what extent successful foveation facilitated saccadic eye movement behavior, with the hypothesis that foveation may constitute an informational reward. Human adults performed saccades to peripheral targets that either remained visible after saccade completion or were extinguished, preventing visual feedback. Saccades to targets that were systematically extinguished were slower and easier to inhibit than saccades to targets that afforded successful foveation, and this effect was modulated by the probability of successful foveation. These results suggest that successful foveation facilitates behavior, and that obtaining the expected sensory consequences of a saccadic eye movement may serve as a reward for the oculomotor system.

[1]  M. Landy,et al.  Humans Rapidly Estimate Expected Gain in Movement Planning , 2006, Psychological science.

[2]  R. Carpenter,et al.  The influence of urgency on decision time , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Laurent Madelain,et al.  Modification of saccadic gain by reinforcement. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  M. Dorris,et al.  The Relationship between Saccadic Choice and Reaction Times with Manipulations of Target Value , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[5]  Karl R Gegenfurtner,et al.  Effects of salience and reward information during saccadic decisions under risk. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[7]  Okihide Hikosaka,et al.  Reward-Dependent Gain and Bias of Visual Responses in Primate Superior Colliculus , 2003, Neuron.

[8]  R. H. S. Carpenter,et al.  Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements , 1995, Nature.

[9]  M. A. Basso,et al.  Modulation of Neuronal Activity in Superior Colliculus by Changes in Target Probability , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Expectation of reward modulates cognitive signals in the basal ganglia , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Laurent Madelain,et al.  Reinforcing saccadic amplitude variability. , 2011, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  David M Milstein,et al.  The Influence of Expected Value on Saccadic Preparation , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Modulation of saccadic eye movements by predicted reward outcome , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  C. Colby,et al.  Trans-saccadic perception , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control , 1996, Neural Networks.

[17]  J. Wallman,et al.  The spatial scale of attention strongly modulates saccade latencies. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Skyler T. Hawk,et al.  Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database , 2010 .

[19]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  A neural correlate of response bias in monkey caudate nucleus , 2002, Nature.