Grammatical Processing without Semantics? An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Preschoolers using Jabberwocky Sentences

Behavioral studies have demonstrated that children develop a nearly adult-like grammar between 36 and 42 months, but few studies have addressed how the child's brain processes semantic versus syntactic information. In previous research, Silva-Pereyra and colleagues showed that distinct event-related potentials (ERPs) are elicited by semantic and syntactic violations in sentences in children as young as 30, 36, and 48 months, following the patterns displayed by adults. In the current study, we examined ERPs to syntactic phrase structure violations in real and jabberwocky sentences in 36-month-old children. Jabberwocky sentences are sentences in which content (open-class) words are replaced by pseudowords while function (closed-class) words are retained. Results showed that syntactically anomalous real sentences elicited two positive ERP effects: left-distributed effects from 500 to 750 msec and 1050 to 1300 msec, whereas syntactically anomalous jabberwocky sentences elicited two negative ERP effects: a left-distributed effect from 750 to 900 msec and a later broadly distributed effect from 950 to 1150 msec. The results indicate that when preschoolers process real English sentences, ERPs resembling the positive effects previously reported for adults are noted, although at longer latencies and with broader scalp distributions. However, when preschoolers process jabberwocky sentences with altered lexical-semantic content, a negative-going ERP component similar to one typically associated with the extraction of meaning is noted.

[1]  Patricia K Kuhl,et al.  An event-related brain potential study of sentence comprehension in preschoolers: semantic and morphosyntactic processing. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Children use syntax to learn verb meanings , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[3]  Enriqueta Canseco-Gonzalez Using the Recording of Event-Related Brain Potentials in the Study of Sentence Processing , 2000 .

[4]  H. Neville,et al.  Language Acquisition and Cerebral Specialization in 20-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Learning argument structure generalizations , 2004 .

[6]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Kutas,et al.  Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005) , 2006 .

[8]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach. , 2003, Journal of child language.

[9]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. , 2003, Developmental science.

[10]  C. Felser,et al.  Grammatical processing in language learners , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[11]  J. Werker,et al.  The Perceptual Acquisition of Phonological Contrasts , 2004 .

[12]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Input to verb learning: Evidence for the plausibility of syntactic bootstrapping , 1995 .

[13]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Cues, Constraints, and Competition in Sentence Processing , 2004 .

[14]  J. Werker,et al.  Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks , 1997, Nature.

[15]  Jörg D. Jescheniak,et al.  What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory comprehension , 2001 .

[16]  Cynthia Fisher,et al.  On the semantic content of subcategorization frames , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  H. Heinze,et al.  ERP Negativities During Syntactic Processing of Written Words , 1994 .

[18]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[19]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Cue validity and sentence interpretation in , 2008 .

[20]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. , 1992 .

[21]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  On the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Manipulations of Word Position and Word Class Reveal Individual Differences , 1997, Brain and Language.

[22]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  H. Neville,et al.  Visual and auditory sentence processing: A developmental analysis using event‐related brain potentials , 1992 .

[24]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .

[25]  M. Kutas,et al.  ERPs and Domain Specificity: Beating a Straw Horse , 1998 .

[26]  D A Behrend,et al.  Morphological cues to verb meaning: verb inflections and the initial mapping of verb meanings , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[27]  D. Mills,et al.  Two languages, one developing brain: event-related potentials to words in bilingual toddlers. , 2006, Developmental science.

[28]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic event-related potential components in 24-month-olds’ sentence comprehension , 2006, Neuroreport.

[29]  A. Friederici Neurophysiological markers of early language acquisition: from syllables to sentences , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and human language , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  A. Friederici The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[32]  G. Thierry,et al.  Familiar words capture the attention of 11-month-olds in less than 250 ms , 2003, Neuroreport.

[33]  Development of sentence interpretation strategies by typically developing and late-talking toddlers. , 2001, Journal of child language.

[34]  A. Charvillat,et al.  Local and topological processing in sentence comprehension by French and Spanish children , 1988, Journal of Child Language.

[35]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[36]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[37]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  E. Bates,et al.  Developmental changes in real-time sentence processing , 1996 .

[39]  A. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event related potentials and language comprehension. , 1995 .

[41]  Patricia K Kuhl,et al.  Sentence processing in 30-month-old children: an event-related potential study , 2005, Neuroreport.

[42]  Cynthia L Fisher,et al.  Structure and meaning in the verb lexicon: Input for a syntax-aided verb learning procedure , 1994 .

[43]  E. Bates,et al.  Psycholinguistics: a cross-language perspective. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[44]  Lila R. Gleitman,et al.  The Role of Syntax in Verb Learning , 2019, The Handbook of Child Language.

[45]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[46]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The neurocognition of syntactic processing , 1999 .

[47]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  The development of complex sentence interpretation in typically developing children compared with children with specific language impairments or early unilateral focal lesions. , 2004, Developmental science.

[48]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Neural Correlates of Syntactic Processing in Two-Year-Olds , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[51]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  The Origins of Grammar: Evidence from Early Language Comprehension , 1999 .

[52]  R. Brown A First Language , 1973 .

[53]  L Frazier,et al.  Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[54]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Language comprehension and cerebral specialization from 13 to 20 months , 1997 .

[55]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian , 1984 .

[56]  S. Pinker The language instinct : how the mind creates language , 1995 .

[57]  Thomas F. Mnte,et al.  Brain Activity Associated with Syntactic Incongruencies in Words and Pseudo-Words , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  Arturo E. Hernandez,et al.  Sentence interpretation strategies in emergent bilingual children and adults , 2006, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[59]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[60]  Lori K. Keith Book Review: Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals - Preschool , 1994 .

[61]  L. Fenson,et al.  Lexical development norms for young children , 1996 .

[62]  M. Tomasello First Steps toward a Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2001 .

[63]  B MacWhinney,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. , 1984, Child development.

[64]  D. Slobin Crosslinguistic Evidence for the Language-making Capacity , 1985 .

[65]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[66]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  The use of multiple frames in verb learning via syntactic bootstrapping , 1996, Cognition.

[67]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[68]  M. Raijmakers Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. , 1997 .

[69]  Maritza Rivera-Gaxiola,et al.  Neural substrates of language acquisition. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[70]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz Cerebral Specialization for Speech and Non-Speech Stimuli in Infants , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  J. Pine,et al.  Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[72]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Language Experience and the Organization of Brain Activity to Phonetically Similar Words: ERP Evidence from 14- and 20-Month-Olds , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[73]  A. Friederici,et al.  The brain basis of syntactic processes: functional imaging and lesion studies , 2003, NeuroImage.

[74]  S. Pinker,et al.  The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language , 1994 .

[75]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[76]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[77]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Thedevelopmentofsentence Comprehension In Italian And Serbocroatian: Local Versus Distributed Cues , 1998 .

[78]  K. Plunkett,et al.  Watching the Infant Brain Learn Words: Effects of Vocabulary Size and Experience. , 2005 .

[79]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Getting There (Slowly) , 1998 .

[80]  Katrin Lindner,et al.  The development of sentence-interpretation strategies in monolingual German-learning children with and without specific language impairment , 2003 .

[81]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[82]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[83]  P. Kuhl Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[84]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Gender and Semantic Expectancy: ERPs Reveal Early Autonomy and Late Interaction , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[85]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[86]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[87]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The impact of semantic-free second-language training on ERPs during case processing , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[88]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child , 1988 .

[89]  J. Aitchinson The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[90]  R. B. Freeman,et al.  The ontogeny of brain lateralization for speech and nonspeech stimuli , 1975, Brain and Language.

[91]  D. Molfese,et al.  Hemisphere and Stimulus Differences as Reflected in the Cortical Responses of Newborn Infants to Speech Stimuli. , 1979 .

[92]  M. Ullman Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model , 2004, Cognition.

[93]  S. Pinker,et al.  The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[94]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[95]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Brain Signatures of Syntactic and Semantic Processes during Children's Language Development , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.