Determination on inhibition effects of coagulants used in wastewater treatment plants on anaerobic digester.

Domestic wastewaters causing pollution contain inorganic and/or organic materials. When the domestic wastewater outflows to the receiving waters, it causes physical, chemical, and biological pollution in them, and deteriorates the ecological balance of those waters. In the treatment of wastewater, various treatment methods are available depending on the pollution strength of the wastewater. Besides mechanical and biological methods, wastewater treatment with physicochemical methods is still one of the most effective and economical options. Particularly in wastewater with a high concentration of suspended solids, this method is very successful, and obtaining high suspended solids removal efficiencies is very possible. In this study, the effects of the use of coagulant and coagulant aid to be used in a treatment plant where domestic wastewater treatment is carried out are determined to increase the treatment efficiency of a biological treatment that comes later in the stages of the treatment. The effluent of the pre-settling tank may contain a lot of suspended solids. This presence of excess suspended solids decreases the efficiency at other levels of treatment and causes energy loss. In the experiments, the standard jar and inhibition tests are done as a method. As a result of the conducted studies, it is determined that the FeCl3, Synthetic coagulant LP 526, FeClSO4, and the combination of anionic polyelectrolyte yield the best results in the removal of the parameters of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), and volatile suspended solids (VSS). While FeCl3, APE 65, APE 85, Synthetic coagulant LP 526, and FeClSO4 did not show any inhibition effect in the sludge, APE 67, CPE 84, and (Al2(SO4)3 are found to cause inhibition in the sludge.

[1]  R. Gonçalves,et al.  Thermochemical conversion of wastewater microalgae: The effects of coagulants used in the harvest process , 2020 .

[2]  N. Abdullah,et al.  Effect of pre-treatment with a tannin-based coagulant and flocculant on a biofilm bacterial community and the nitrification process in a municipal wastewater biofilm treatment unit , 2020 .

[3]  M. Ray,et al.  Reusability of recovered iron coagulant from primary municipal sludge and its impact on chemically enhanced primary treatment , 2020 .

[4]  R. Bergamasco,et al.  Influence evaluation of the functionalization of magnetic nanoparticles with a natural extract coagulant in the primary treatment of a dairy cleaning-in-place wastewater , 2020 .

[5]  M. Monjerezi,et al.  Evaluation of coagulating efficiency and water borne pathogens reduction capacity of Moringa oleifera seed powder for treatment of domestic wastewater from Zomba, Malawi , 2019, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering.

[6]  R. Bergamasco,et al.  Performance of different coagulants in the coagulation/flocculation process of textile wastewater , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[7]  A. B. Şengül,et al.  Removal of intra- and extracellular microcystin by submerged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane combined with coagulation/flocculation and powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption. , 2018, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Xiao-yan Li,et al.  Effect of coagulant on acidogenic fermentation of sludge from enhanced primary sedimentation for resource recovery: Comparison between FeCl3 and PACl , 2017 .

[9]  N. Hilal,et al.  Effective coagulation-flocculation treatment of highly polluted palm oil mill biogas plant wastewater using dual coagulants: Decolourisation, kinetics and phytotoxicity studies , 2017 .

[10]  Henrique Cesar Lopes Geraldino,et al.  Optimization of coagulation-flocculation process for treatment of industrial textile wastewater using okra (A. esculentus) mucilage as natural coagulant , 2015 .

[11]  Yasong Chen The Effect on Activated Sludge of Chemical Coagulants Applied in Synchronization Dephosphorization , 2013 .

[12]  G. Zeng,et al.  Effect of trace amounts of polyacrylamide (PAM) on long-term performance of activated sludge. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  Chun-Yang Yin,et al.  Emerging usage of plant-based coagulants for water and wastewater treatment , 2010 .

[14]  I. Arslan-Alaton,et al.  Treatability of a Simulated Spent Disperse Dyebath by Chemical and Electrochemical Processes , 2008 .

[15]  John Gregory,et al.  Organic polyelectrolytes in water treatment. , 2007, Water research.

[16]  N. Al-Mutairi Coagulant toxicity and effectiveness in a slaughterhouse wastewater treatment plant. , 2006, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[17]  M. Hamoda,et al.  Coagulant selection and sludge conditioning in a slaughterhouse wastewater treatment plant. , 2004, Bioresource technology.

[18]  W. Brostow,et al.  POLYMERIC FLOCCULANTS FOR WASTEWATER AND INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT TREATMENT , 2009 .

[19]  I. Arslan-Alaton,et al.  Chemical Pretreatment of a Spent Disperse Dyebath Analogue by Coagulation and Electrocoagulation , 2008 .

[20]  P. Singh,et al.  Effect of feeding wheat bran and deoiled rice bran on feed intake and nutrient utilization in crossbred cows. , 2000 .