User Interfaces for All

For the acceptance of future network-based media services the technical advancement of the man-machine interface is of great importance. The Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI) in Karlsruhe has conducted an expert survey on different acceptance factors, on the future development of media usage behavior, on network infrastructure and terminal devices as well as on the expected market development. Drawing on the results we point out perspectives in the light of today’s user needs and the technical possibilities. Over the last two decades progress in software engineering and hardware miniaturization have turned the computer from a large device that could only be operated by specialists into a common consumer good that can be found in almost all areas of private and business life. The IBM Personal Computer (1981) and the Apple Macintosh (1984) were important early milestones on the way to the computer as a useful product for everyone. Today it is much more than a simple calculating machine or tool. With the establishment and commercialization of computer networks since the early 1990’s the computer became a new medium fulfilling information and communication needs [Friedewald 1999]. According to expert opinion online media services will lead to a substantial expansion of financial and time expenditure of private households for the use of media. Network-bound media offerings like Internet or online services enable easy access to conventional media contents, for example newspaper articles, music titles, and video sequences at each time of day. The most important progress however is the possible integration of different types of media as well as their linkage to additional services. This includes communication with other users, the handling of transactions, e.g. electronic shopping, and even interactive television. Supported by the German Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology and in co-operation with a research association focussing on media education (Medienpadagogischer Forschungsverbund Sudwest) the Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI) in Karlsruhe has conducted a survey on the expected future development of media usage behavior, on network technology and terminal devices, as well as on market development in Germany. 13 The survey is part of the research project “Development of Media Services“ (DeMeS) about the future media use in the private sector [Harnischfeger et al. 1999]. 281 experts have participated, 40 % of whom belonged to the German industrial sector (media industries, information and communication technology). In addition, experts were chosen from German Institutions, who either have a scientific interest in media or who are concerned with the shaping of the media sector and its social, political and economic conditions (politics, churches and unions, as well as professional organizations). The survey was conducted by mailing questionnaires. Most of the questions were closed, showing a variety of possible answers to be ticked. The experts were not asked to justify their estimates. However several questions focusing on related topics allowed a check for consistency. Furthermore comparison of estimates by experts from different professional backgrounds showed no significant difference concerning the results discussed below. In combination with the 1998 Delphi study questioning more than 2,000 experts on the global development of science and technology [Cuhls et al. 1998], this data allows a thorough view on what users require from future terminal equipment, and what technical developments can be expected. 1 Diffusion of Terminal Devices While in the middle of the 1970 there were no more than 165,000 computers world-wide, this number grew up to 200 million devices in 1997 [Phister et al. 1983, Kelly 1997]. Today a personal computer is available in more than 40 % of the US-American and in approximately 30 % of the Western European households. It is expected that in Europe this number will increase by further 10 % up to the year 2001 [Zerdick et al. 1999, EITO 1999]. Until recently stationary PCs were the only devices for using online services. In the future a multiplicity of new devices will appear: e. g. Network PCs that receive their software via network connection, television sets with computer functions or enhanced mobile phones. Because of particular features, such as the small display of mobile phones, the mode of interaction has to be adjusted for a number of new terminal devices [Oliphant 1999]. Media services based on the Internet Protocol Suite offer new application perspectives even for those users, who in the past did not see a reason for buying a PC with its stand-alone applications. Altogether the experts expect that the share of households with terminal devices for the use of online services will rise from 9 % today to more than 40 % in 2015. The growth will be even faster with mobile devices, which at present constitute a share of less than 1 %. It is expected that in 2015 almost 17 % of the households will be using mobile equipment (Fig. 1) [Harnischfeger et al. 1999]. The crucial point for this development is the users acceptance. Before discussing the technical factors with respect to acceptance it is worth mentioning that the social environment and the user competence are central as well. More than 80 % of the experts regard vocational practice with multimedia technologies, the integration of multimedia into the educational context, a highquality and reasonable priced customer service as well as personal non-commercial help in case of problems as important or very important for the acceptance. These findings illustrate that the formation of user competence by self-instruction or “trial and error” that is still often practiced today will not be sufficient for a broad acceptance and future diffusion in the view of the experts. 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 1995 200

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Generalization as Search , 2002 .

[3]  Sidney L. Smith,et al.  Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software , 1986 .

[4]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[5]  H. Heckhausen Causal attribution patterns for achievement outcomes: Individual differences, possible types and their origins , 1987 .

[6]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organization of Organizational Interfaces. , 1988 .

[7]  S. Kovacevic,et al.  A knowledge-based user interface management system , 1988, CHI '88.

[8]  William C. Mann,et al.  Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis , 1989 .

[9]  Meera Blattner,et al.  Earcons and Icons: Their Structure and Common Design Principles , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Dominique L. Scapin,et al.  Organizing human factors knowledge for the evaluation and design of interfaces , 1990, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  James D. Foley,et al.  Coupling a UI framework with automatic generation of context-sensitive animated help , 1990, UIST '90.

[12]  Matthias Rauterberg,et al.  Task orientation and user-oriented dialog design , 1991, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Thomas Rist,et al.  The Design of Illustrated Documents as a Planning Task , 1993, AAAI Workshop on Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces.

[14]  Mark T. Maybury,et al.  Planning Multimedia Explanations Using Communicative Acts , 1991, AAAI Workshop on Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces.

[15]  C. Handy Inside Organizations: 21 Ideas for Managers , 1991 .

[16]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  From Human Factors to Human Actors: The Role of Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction Studies in System Design , 1992, Design at Work.

[17]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Triggers and barriers to customizing software , 1991, CHI.

[18]  Eduard H. Hovy,et al.  On the Knowledge Underlying Multimedia Presentations , 1991, AAAI Workshop on Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces.

[19]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface , 1991 .

[20]  Neil G. Scott The Universal Access System. , 1992 .

[21]  M. Prior,et al.  Further Comment: Autism and Assisted Communication: A Response to Biklen , 1992 .

[22]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Experiments with Oval: a radically tailorable tool for cooperative work , 1992 .

[23]  Ping Luo,et al.  Beyond interface builders: model-based interface tools , 1993, INTERCHI.

[24]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  Watch what I do: programming by demonstration , 1993 .

[25]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Special Education for the Twenty-First Century , 1993, Journal of learning disabilities.

[26]  C. Thoren Nordic guidelines for computer accessibility , 1993 .

[27]  Ronald M. Kaplan,et al.  The Interface between Phrasal and Functional Constraints , 1993, Comput. Linguistics.

[28]  Reinhard Oppermann,et al.  Adaptively supported adaptability , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  J. Nielsen Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[30]  John Riedl,et al.  GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews , 1994, CSCW '94.

[31]  Yoichi Shinoda,et al.  Information filtering based on user behavior analysis and best match text retrieval , 1994, SIGIR '94.

[32]  A. Stanton Children with Disabilities. A Medical Primer , 1994 .

[33]  Eric Bergman,et al.  Towards Accessible Human-Computer Interaction1 , 1995 .

[34]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  Automatic generation of task-oriented help , 1995, UIST '95.

[35]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development: john wiley & sons , 1995 .

[36]  Katsuhiko Ogawa,et al.  GuideBook: design guidelines database for assisting the interface design task , 1995, SGCH.

[37]  Jean-Francois Girard,et al.  Reengineering User Interfaces , 1995, IEEE Softw..

[38]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Building non-visual interaction through the development of the rooms metaphor , 1995, CHI '95.

[39]  Douglas C. Engelbart,et al.  Toward augmenting the human intellect and boosting our collective IQ , 1995, CACM.

[40]  Renato Iannella HyperSAM: a management tool for large user interface guideline sets , 1995, SGCH.

[41]  Sherry Perdue Casali,et al.  A physical skills based strategy for choosing an appropriate interface method , 1995 .

[42]  Philippe A. Palanque,et al.  Validating interactive system design through the verification of formal task and system models , 1995, EHCI.

[43]  J. McGrath Methodology matters: doing research in the behavioral and social sciences , 1995 .

[44]  Jean Vanderdonckt Accessing guidelines information with Sierra , 1995, INTERACT.

[45]  Harald Reiterer IDA - a design environment for ergonomic user interfaces , 1995, INTERACT.

[46]  Peter Johnson,et al.  Rapid prototyping of user interfaces driven by task models , 1995 .

[47]  Peter Gorny,et al.  EXPOSE. HCI-counseling for user interface design , 1995, INTERACT.

[48]  Mark Rosenstein,et al.  Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use , 1995, CHI '95.

[49]  Helge Kahler,et al.  From taylorism to tailorability supporting organizations with tailorable software and object orientation , 1995 .

[50]  Ephraim P. Glinert,et al.  The adaptive multi-interface multimodal environment , 1996, CSUR.

[51]  Christelle Farenc,et al.  Automatic Ergonomic Evaluation: What are the Limits? , 1996, CADUI.

[52]  Constantinos Viglas,et al.  A novel software architecture for computer-based interpersonal communication aids , 1996 .

[53]  Cécile Paris,et al.  An Interactive Support Tool for Writing Multilingual Manuals , 1996, Computer.

[54]  Javier Contreras,et al.  A Framework for the Automatic Generation of Software Tutoring , 1996, CADUI.

[55]  Dominique L. Scapin,et al.  Looking for usability problems with the ergonomic criteria and with the ISO 9241-10 dialogue principles , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[56]  Stephen Brewster,et al.  An audio glance at syntactic structure based on spoken form , 1996 .

[57]  David Maulsby,et al.  Inductive task modeling for user interface customization , 1997, IUI '97.

[58]  Thomas Rist,et al.  A standard reference model for intelligent multimedia presentation systems , 1997, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[59]  Helen Petrie,et al.  Initial design and evaluation of an interface to hypermedia systems for blind users , 1997, HYPERTEXT '97.

[60]  Richard Zeckhauser,et al.  Recommender systems for evaluating computer messages , 1997, CACM.

[61]  N. Glance,et al.  Knowledge Pump : Community-centered Collaborative Filtering , 1997 .

[62]  M. Zanello Contribution à la connaissance sur l'utilisation et la gestion de l'interface multimodale , 1997 .

[63]  John Karat,et al.  User-Centered Software Evaluation Methodologies , 1997 .

[64]  Harald Reiterer,et al.  Software evaluation using the 9241 evaluator , 1997, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[65]  Ivan Kopeček Syllable- Based Speech Synthesis. , 1997 .

[66]  Volker Wulf,et al.  How to make software softer—designing tailorable applications , 1997, DIS '97.

[67]  Bradley N. Miller,et al.  Collaborative Filtering to Usenet News , 1997 .

[68]  S Sprigle,et al.  Physical accessibility guidelines of consumer product controls. , 1997, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[69]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Intelligent software , 1997, IUI '97.

[70]  Rob Procter,et al.  Social Affordances and Implicit Ratings for Social Filtering on the Web , 1997 .

[71]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Embedding Scanning Techniques Accessible to Motor-Impaired Users in the WINDOWS Object Library , 1997, HCI.

[72]  Chauncey E. Wilson,et al.  The Usability Engineering Framework for Product Design and Evaluation , 1997 .

[73]  P. Rodríguez,et al.  Parsing Techniques for User-Task Recognition , 1997 .

[74]  Ivan Kopeček Dialog Based Programming , 1998 .

[75]  Wolfgang Appelt,et al.  Effectiveness and Efficiency: The Need for Tailorable User Interfaces on the Web , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[76]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Adaptable and adaptive information provision for all users, including disabled and elderly people , 1998, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[77]  Fiorella de Rosis,et al.  The dynamic generation of hypertext presentations of medical guidelines , 1998, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[78]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Adaptable and Adaptive User Interfaces for Disabled Users in the AVANTI Project , 1998, IS&N.

[79]  M F Story,et al.  Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design. , 1998, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[80]  Bradley N. Miller,et al.  Using filtering agents to improve prediction quality in the GroupLens research collaborative filtering system , 1998, CSCW '98.

[81]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Support for Iterative User Interface Prototyping: The Sherlock Guideline Management System , 1998, EHCI.

[82]  Christian Stary,et al.  Implementing the directive for VDU work- the EU-state of the art , 1998, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[83]  A. Puerta Supporting User-Centered Design of Adaptive User Interfaces Via Interface Models , 1998 .

[84]  Gary Perlman,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd ed. Edited by Martin G. Helander, Thomas K. Landauer, & Prasad V. Prabhu 1997, 1602 pages, $390.00 (30% discount for HFES members) Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier ISBN 0-444-81862-6 , 1998 .

[85]  Kevin F. Kelly New Rules for the New Economy , 1998 .

[86]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  The HOMER UIMS for dual user interface development: Fusing visual and non-visual interactions , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[87]  Christopher Peter Lueg,et al.  Considering Collaborative Filtering as Groupware: Experiences and Lessons Learned , 1998, PAKM.

[88]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Task-Oriented Dialogs with Animated Agents in Virtual Reality , 1998 .

[89]  Brad A. Myers,et al.  A brief history of human-computer interaction technology , 1998, INTR.

[90]  W. Johnston Europe's future mobile telephony system , 1998 .

[91]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Analysing Requirements to Inform Design , 1998, BCS HCI.

[92]  Javier Contreras,et al.  Help Generation for Task Based Applications with HATS , 1998, EHCI.

[93]  Michael Pieper,et al.  Teleworking for disabled people : Pitfalls and ongoing challenges , 1998 .

[94]  I. Kopeèek The Architecture of the Blind User Oriented Hypertext , 1998 .

[95]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Tailorable groupware: issues, methods, and architectures , 1998, SGCH.

[96]  Karel Pala,et al.  Semantic Annotation of (Czech) Corpus Texts , 1999, TSD.

[97]  Brian Henderson-Sellers A Methodological Metamodel of Process , 1999, J. Object Oriented Program..

[98]  Ing-Marie Jonsson The decoupled application interaction model, D.A.I.M , 1999, HCI.

[99]  Peter Forbrig,et al.  Task and Object-Oriented Development of Interactive Systems - How many models are necessary? , 1999, DSV-IS.

[100]  Rob Procter,et al.  Improving Web Usability with the Link Lens , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[101]  M. W. Oliphant The mobile phone meets the Internet , 1999 .

[102]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Policy perspectives on "design for all" , 1999, HCI.

[103]  Vincent Bouthors,et al.  Pharos, a Collaborative Infrastructure for Web Knowledge Sharing , 1999, ECDL.

[104]  Matthias Klusch,et al.  Intelligent Information Agents: Agent-Based Information Discovery and Management on the Internet , 1999 .

[105]  Jean Vanderdonckt,et al.  Development milestones towards a tool for working with guidelines , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[106]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Talking to the ceiling: an interface for bed-ridden manually impaired users , 1999, CHI EA '99.

[107]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Propagating experience-based accessibility guidelines to user interface development , 1999 .

[108]  Computer ScienceDepartment Nomadicity : Anytime , anywhere in a disconnectedworld , 2000 .

[109]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.