Allocating visual attention: tests of a two-process model.

Observers require less time to identify a visual target when its location is cued in advance than when it is not cued, and the magnitude of the improvement depends on the validity of the cue. According to J. Jonides's (1983) 2-process model, there exist 2 possible modes of attentional readiness: a focused-attention mode and a diffuse-attention mode. Observers are assumed to enter the focused-attention mode on a proportion of trials that matches the validity of the cue and to enter the diffuse-attention mode on the remaining trials. The present experiment tested and rejected the response time mixture prediction of the 2-process model. An instance of the class of 1-process models in which perceptual objects are sampled in parallel according to the validity of the cue was evaluated. A stochastic simulation of the model yielded results that paralleled those of the experiment.

[1]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[2]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Selective attention: Noise suppression or signal enhancement? , 1974 .

[5]  P. Holland,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis. , 1976 .

[6]  D. Madden,et al.  Selective attention and visual search: revision of an allocation model and application to age differences. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[8]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Marilyn L Shaw,et al.  Attending to multiple sources of information: I. The integration of information in decision making , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[11]  J. Jonides.  Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .

[12]  A. V. D. Heijden.  Probability matching in visual selective attention. , 1989 .

[13]  W. Hays.  Statistics, 4th ed. , 1988 .

[14]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[15]  J. Jonides.  Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[16]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  J. Jonides.  Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[18]  D. Meyer,et al.  Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: new tests for stochastic models of cognition and action. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  B. Everitt,et al.  Finite Mixture Distributions , 1981 .

[20]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  Marilyn L. Shaw,et al.  A capacity allocation model for reaction time. , 1978 .