Evaluating patient-reported outcome measurement comparability between paper and alternate versions, using the lung function questionnaire as an example.

[1]  Anand A. Dalal,et al.  Predicting risk of airflow obstruction in primary care: Validation of the lung function questionnaire (LFQ). , 2010, Respiratory medicine.

[2]  Anand A. Dalal,et al.  Development of the Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ) to identify airflow obstruction , 2009, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[3]  David Cella,et al.  Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[4]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. , 2008, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[5]  L. Rajmil.  Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use, 3rd ed , 2005 .

[6]  D. Bonett.  Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  S. Walter,et al.  Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[9]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[10]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[11]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .