MAJOR CRITERIA FOR JUDGING DISASTER PLANNING AND MANAGING THEIR APPLICABILITY IN DEVELOPNG COUNTRIES E. L. Quarantelli 1998 MAJOR CRITERIA FOR JUDGING DISASTER PLANNING AND MANAGING AND THEIR APPLICABILITY IN DEVELOPING SOCIETIES*

The paper discusses what is important in preparing for and managing disaster occasions. The starting point is that what is crucial is not planning or managing per se since there is always a degree of both, but good planning and managing. It is after all possible to have bad instances of both. Thus, to assess in any intelligent way the preparedness planning for and the managing of disasters requires asking the question: What is good planning and managing? We attempt to answer this question on the basis of the results of the empirical research undertaken by social and behavioral scientists over what is now a 40 year period. This research cuts across natural and technological disasters and since it essentially shows that no significant behavioral differences in the two types of crises, we do not discuss any distinction in the two occasions. First, we discuss rather extensively ten general principles of good disaster planning. Our basic point is that any planning can be evaluated as being good or bad depending on how well it meets the ten criteria discussed. Such an evaluation can be made even prior to any disaster occasion. This discussion is followed with a presentation of ten general principles of disaster managing. This is done because our view is that an evaluation of the management of a disaster has to use somewhat different criteria than those applied to preparedness planning. Good management does not automatically follow even from good planning since there is only a partial correlation between the two processes. The paper concludes with noting that the greater part of the research studies we used has been done in developed countries rather than developing ones. Thus, we first discuss some possible disaster-related differences between the two kinds of social systems. Our general conclusion is that the 20 principles derived mostly from studies in developed societies are in varying degrees applicable to developing countries.

[1]  Russell R. Dynes,et al.  Problems in emergency planning , 1983 .

[2]  F. Bates,et al.  Disaster and Social Change , 1987 .

[3]  T. Drabek.  Managing the Emergency Response. , 1985 .

[4]  G. Kreps.  Social structure and disaster , 1990 .

[5]  E. Quarantelli,et al.  A Perspective on Disaster Planning , 1972 .

[6]  Gene I. Rochlin.  Technology and adaptive hierarchy : formal and informal organization for flight operations in the U.S. Navy , 1988 .

[7]  E. Quarantelli,et al.  Response to Social Crisis and Disaster , 1977 .

[8]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Population evacuation in volcanic eruptions, floods, and nuclear power plant accidents: Some elementary comparisons , 1983 .

[9]  T. Drabek,et al.  Human System Responses to Disasters: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. , 1988 .

[10]  E. L. Quarantelli.  The Disaster Research Center Simulation Studies Of Organization Behavior Under Stress , 1967 .

[11]  HELPING BEHAVIOR IN LARGE SCALE DISASTERS: A SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONAL APPROACH , 1977 .

[12]  E. Quarantelli.  Evacuation Behavior and Problems: Findings and Implications from the Research Literature. , 1980 .

[13]  Russell R. Dynes,et al.  Sociology of disasters : contributions of sociology to disaster research , 1988 .

[14]  E. Quarantelli,et al.  Individual and Organizational Response to the 1985 Earthquake in Mexico City, Mexico , 1990 .

[15]  Erik Auf der Heide,et al.  Disaster Response: Principles of Preparation and Coordination , 1989 .

[16]  George O. Rogers,et al.  Role conflict in crises of limited forewarning. , 1986 .

[17]  S. Cutter.  Environmental Risks and Hazards , 1993 .

[18]  P. Lagadec,et al.  States of Emergency: Technological Failures and Social Destabilization , 1990 .

[19]  Benigno E. Aguirre,et al.  The Social Organization of Search and Rescue: Evidence From the Guadalajara Gasoline Explosion , 1995, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[20]  Russell R. Dynes,et al.  Disaster Reduction: The Importance Of Adequate Assumptions About Social Organization , 1993 .

[21]  E. L. Quarantelli.  The Environmental Disasters of The Future Will Be More and Worse but the Prospects Is not Hopeless , 1993 .

[22]  R. Schware.  Flood information systems: Needs and improvements in Eastern India , 1984 .

[23]  E. Quarantelli,et al.  Organizational Behavior In Disasters And Implications For Disaster Planning , 1985 .

[24]  E. Quarantelli.  Can and Should Social Science Disaster Research Knowledge and Findings from Developed Societies be Applied in Developing Societies? , 1992 .

[25]  W. Waugh,et al.  Emergency management : principles and practice for local government , 2007 .

[26]  Dennis E. Wenger,et al.  Disaster Analysis: Emergency Management Offices and Arrangements. , 1987 .

[27]  Enrico L Quarantelli,et al.  CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DISASTER PLANNING IN AN URBAN SETTING , 1988 .

[28]  Enrico L Quarantelli.  Chemical disaster preparedness at the local community level , 1984 .

[29]  E. Quarantelli.  Delivery of Emergency Medical Services in Disasters: Assumptions and Realities , 1983 .