Pareto Distance for Multi-layer Network Analysis

Social Network Analysis has been historically applied to single networks, e.g., interaction networks between co-workers. However, the advent of on-line social network sites has emphasized the stratified structure of our social experience. Individuals usually spread their identities over multiple services, e.g., Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and Foursquare. As a result, the analysis of on-line social networks requires a wider scope and, more technically speaking, models for the representation of this fragmented scenario. The recent introduction of more realistic layered models has however determined new research problems related to the extension of traditional single-layer network measures. In this paper we take a step forward over existing approaches by defining a new concept of geodesic distance that includes heterogeneous networks and connections with very limited assumptions regarding the strength of the connections. This is achieved by exploiting the concept of Pareto efficiency to define a simple and at the same time powerful measure that we call Pareto distance, of which geodesic distance is a particular case when a single layer (or network) is analyzed. The limited assumptions on the nature of the connections required by the Pareto distance may in theory result in a large number of potential shortest paths between pairs of nodes. However, an experimental computation of distances on multi-layer networks of increasing size shows an interesting and non-trivial stable behavior.

[1]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[2]  Katarzyna Musial,et al.  Multi-Layered Social Network Creation Based on Bibliographic Data , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[3]  Matteo Magnani,et al.  The ML-Model for Multi-layer Social Networks , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[4]  Yizhou Sun,et al.  RankClus: integrating clustering with ranking for heterogeneous information network analysis , 2009, EDBT '09.

[5]  Anna Monreale,et al.  Foundations of Multidimensional Network Analysis , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[6]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Graph cube: on warehousing and OLAP multidimensional networks , 2011, SIGMOD '11.

[7]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Community Mining from Multi-relational Networks , 2005, PKDD.

[8]  Luís Torgo,et al.  Knowledge Discovery in Databases: PKDD 2005, 9th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Porto, Portugal, October 3-7, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, PKDD.

[9]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[10]  Matteo Magnani,et al.  Conversation Practices and Network Structure in Twitter , 2012, ICWSM.

[11]  Matteo Magnani,et al.  Formation of Multiple Networks , 2013, SBP.

[12]  Przemyslaw Kazienko,et al.  Shortest Path Discovery in the Multi-layered Social Network , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[13]  Matteo Magnani,et al.  Information Propagation Analysis in a Social Network Site , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[14]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .