TEACHING TEAM DYNAMICS: EXPERIENCES IN SECOND-YEAR MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN

The evolution of team dynamics activities in Mechanical Engineering at the University of British Columbia (UBC) is presented with student feedback and key lessons learned. Rather than leave it to students to learn team skills on their own, formal teaching of team dynamics has been part of the second-year Mechanical Engineering curriculum at UBC for approximately the past ten years. In early attempts, students displayed widespread disinterest and resistance towards learning team dynamics. The content and delivery of team dynamics material has evolved to the point where, now, almost 85% of students cite this material as being valuable and helpful. The key elements that appear to have made the new approach successful include presenting the material in a manner that is directly and immediately relevant to individual students and project teams, as well as having the material permeate throughout all elements of the course.

[1]  Elisha Y. Babad,et al.  Teaching Group Dynamics in Academic Settings: Basic Dilemmas and Some Tentative Solutions , 1978 .

[2]  Susan Brown Feichtner,et al.  Why Some Groups Fail: a Survey of Students' Experiences with Learning Groups , 1984 .

[3]  C. Peter,et al.  The interaction of engineering ‘types’: A study of group dynamics and its relationship to self and peer assessment during computer-based exercises , 2006 .

[4]  L. Fink,et al.  Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses , 2003 .

[5]  B. Kabanoff,et al.  Toward theory-based measures of conflict management , 1990 .

[6]  Kent D. Fairfield,et al.  Tuning into the Music of Groups: A Metaphor for Team-Based Learning in Management Education , 2003 .

[7]  Setting the Stage for Good Group Dynamics in Semester-Long Projects in the Sciences , 2006 .

[8]  C. R. Cosgrove,et al.  Assigning Students to Groups for Engineering Design Projects: A Comparison of Five Methods , 1994 .

[9]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[10]  Yining Chen,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Peer Evaluation: An Expectancy Perspective , 2004 .

[11]  Michael Racer,et al.  GROUP DYNAMICS IN PROJECTS: DON'T FORGET THE SOCIAL ASPECTS , 2000 .

[12]  L. Dee Fink,et al.  Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching , 2002 .

[13]  Carl Savage,et al.  Teaching group dynamics–do we know what we are doing? An approach to evaluation , 2008, Medical teacher.

[15]  Peter M. Ostafichuk,et al.  ASSESSING PEER EVALUATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PEER EVALUATION METHODS USED IN AN ENGINEERING DESIGN COURSE , 2011 .

[16]  Elizabeth A. Croft,et al.  Analysis of Mech 2: An award-winning Second-Year mechanical engineering curriculum , 2008 .