Source apportionment of ambient non-methane hydrocarbons in Hong Kong : Application of a principal component analysis / absolute principal component scores ( PCA / APCS ) receptor model

Receptor-oriented source apportionment models are often used to identify sources of ambient air pollutants and to estimate source contributions to air pollutant concentrations. In this study, a PCA/APCS model was applied to the data on non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) measured from January to December 2001 at two sampling sites: Tsuen Wan (TW) and Central & Western (CW) Toxic Air Pollutants Monitoring Stations in Hong Kong. This multivariate method enables the identification of major air pollution sources along with the quantitative apportionment of each source to pollutant species. The PCA analysis identified four major pollution sources at TW site and five major sources at CW site. The extracted pollution sources included vehicular internal engine combustion with unburned fuel emissions, use of solvent particularly paints, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) or natural gas leakage, and industrial, commercial and domestic sources such as solvents, decoration, fuel combustion, chemical factories and power plants. The results of APCS receptor model indicated that 39% and 48% of the total NMHCs mass concentrations measured at CW and TW were originated from vehicle emissions, respectively. 32% and 36.4% of the total NMHCs were emitted from the use of solvent and 11% and 19.4% were apportioned to the LPG or natural gas leakage, respectively. 5.2% and 9% of the total NMHCs mass concentrations were attributed to other industrial, commercial and domestic sources, respectively. It was also found that vehicle emissions and LPG or natural gas leakage were the main sources of C3–C5 alkanes and C3–C5 alkenes while aromatics were predominantly released from paints. Comparison of source contributions to ambient NMHCs at the two sites indicated that the contribution of LPG or natural gas at CW site was almost twice that at TW site. High correlation coefficients (R > 0.8) between the measured and predicted values suggested that the PCA/APCS model was applicable for estimation of sources of NMHCs in ambient air. # 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  H. Kaiser.  The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis , 1958 .

[2]  Shelly L. Miller,et al.  Source apportionment of exposures to volatile organic compounds. I. Evaluation of receptor models using simulated exposure data , 2002 .

[3]  J. A. Bond,et al.  Toxicology and epidemiology of 1,3-butadiene. , 1997, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[4]  John D. Spengler,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF SOURCE CONTRIBUTIONS TO INHALABLE PARTICULATE MATTER POLLUTION IN METROPOLITAN BOSTON , 1985 .

[5]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Photochemical modeling of the Southern California air quality study , 1993 .

[6]  H. Hansson,et al.  Urban air pollution source apportionment using a combination of aerosol and gas monitoring techniques , 1996 .

[7]  H. Akimoto,et al.  Characterization of NMHCs in downtown urban center Kathmandu and rural site Nagarkot in Nepal , 2000 .

[8]  Michael T. Kleinman,et al.  Identifying and estimating the relative importance of sources of airborne particulates , 1980 .

[9]  Ronald C. Henry,et al.  Multivariate analysis of particulate sulfate and other air quality variables by principal components—II. Salt Lake City, Utah and St. Louis, Missouri , 1982 .

[10]  Douglas R. Lawson,et al.  Comparison of Emission Inventory and Ambient Concentration Ratios of CO, NMOG, and NOx in California's South Coast Air Basin , 1992 .

[11]  D. Blake,et al.  Urban Leakage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas and Its Impact on Mexico City Air Quality , 1995, Science.

[12]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Source Apportionment of Atmospheric Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Collected from an Urban Location in Birmingham, U.K. , 1996 .

[13]  A. Elkilani,et al.  Assessment of Air Quality in Ninety-Nine Residences of Kuwait , 1998 .

[14]  G de Gennaro,et al.  Source apportionment of gaseous atmospheric pollutants by means of an absolute principal component scores (APCS) receptor model , 2001, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[15]  S. Arya.  Air Pollution Meteorology and Dispersion , 1998 .

[16]  D. Blake,et al.  Mixing ratios of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere of Karachi, Pakistan , 2002 .

[17]  R. Rasmussen,et al.  Toxic Air Contaminants in Porto Alegre, Brazil , 1999 .

[18]  B. Finlayson‐Pitts,et al.  Tropospheric air pollution: ozone, airborne toxics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and particles. , 1997, Science.

[19]  M. F. Mohamed,et al.  Volatile organic compounds in some urban locations in United States. , 2002, Chemosphere.

[20]  Hai Guo,et al.  Source characterization of BTEX in indoor microenvironments in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[21]  D. Sin,et al.  Development of an analytical technique and stability evaluation of 143 C3-C12 volatile organic compounds in Summa canisters by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2001, The Analyst.

[22]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Review of volatile organic compound source apportionment by chemical mass balance , 2001 .

[23]  G. M. Hidy,et al.  Multivariate analysis of particulate sulfate and other air quality variables by principal components-Part I: Annual data from Los Angeles and New York , 1979 .

[24]  D. Brocco,et al.  Determination of aromatic hydrocarbons in urban air of Rome , 1997 .

[25]  Richard A. Wadden,et al.  Receptor modeling of volatile organic compounds. 1. Emission inventory and validation , 1993 .

[26]  R. Henry,et al.  Application of SAFER model to the Los Angeles PM10 data , 2000 .

[27]  J. Galloo,et al.  Characterisation of NMHCs in a French urban atmosphere: overview of the main sources. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.