Quantifying the effects of soil variability on crop growth using apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements

Spatial heterogeneity of crop growth within fields is rarely quantified but essential for estimating yield and optimizing crop management. Relationships in fields between crop growth and soil physical characteristics have been described before but an unrealistically high number of invasive measurements have to be made to obtain spatially continuous soil information. Alternatively, non-invasive methods are available for characterizing soil heterogeneity but relationships to growth characteristics have rarely been investigated. Here, we use an electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensor to measure the apparent electromagnetic conductivity of the soil (ECa), which can be used as a proxy for the relative spatial variability of the prevailing soil properties. We evaluate relationships between ECa and soil and crop characteristics assuming that measured ECa patterns relate to observed growth patterns in the field. The test fields were located in Western Germany where different crops (winter wheat, winter barley, and sugar beet) were grown between 2011 and 2013. Measurements include soil texture, soil moisture and crop growth characteristics taken frequently throughout the vegetation periods for plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter of plants and selected organs (green leaves and storage organs). Spatial variability was observed for soil and crop characteristics that differed among fields, crops and years. Good correlations between ECa and soil texture and soil moisture confirmed that ECa measurements are suitable for characterizing spatial differences in soil properties for our test sites. Averaged over all sampling dates of a vegetation period the differences in the spatial variability of crop characteristics were small between the years and crops considered. However, the within-field crop growth heterogeneity changed throughout the growing period depending on the crop development stage. Correlations were found between ECa and the crop characteristics that varied with time and were most pronounced in the main growth phase when LAI approached its maximum. Crop height correlated better with ECa than yield, LAI, and dry matter but differences were observed between fields, years and crops. Our results suggest that in dry years soil patterns have a stronger influence on the crop growth patterns than in wetter years when water limitation is less severe. We conclude that ECa measurements are suitable for detecting spatial patterns in soil characteristics that influence the spatial crop growth patterns for the region, years and crops considered. However, relationships between patterns in crop growth and soil characteristics within fields are more complex and require further investigation.

[1]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  Site-specific management in salt-affected sugar beet fields using electromagnetic induction , 2005 .

[2]  Scott M. Lesch,et al.  Spatial Prediction of Soil Salinity Using Electromagnetic Induction Techniques: 1. Statistical Prediction Models: A Comparison of Multiple Linear Regression and Cokriging , 1995 .

[3]  Lutz Weihermüller,et al.  Linking satellite derived LAI patterns with subsoil heterogeneity using large-scale ground-based electromagnetic induction measurements , 2015 .

[4]  J. C. Taylor,et al.  Soil Factors and their Influence on Within-field Crop Variability, Part I: Field Observation of Soil Variation , 2003 .

[5]  D. Itenfisu,et al.  WITHIN FIELD VARIABILITY IN WHEAT GRAIN YIELDS OVER NINE YEARS IN OKLAHOMA , 2002 .

[6]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[7]  Margaret A. Oliver,et al.  Exploring the spatial relations between soil physical properties and apparent electrical conductivity , 2005 .

[8]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity , 2005 .

[9]  Stefan Pätzold,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity of soil properties and its mapping with apparent electrical conductivity , 2008 .

[10]  Ayse Irmak,et al.  ESTIMATING SPATIALLY VARIABLE SOIL PROPERTIES FOR APPLICATION OF CROP MODELS IN PRECISION FARMING , 2001 .

[11]  Roger A. Eigenberg,et al.  STATUS OF SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY STUDIES BY CENTRAL STATE RESEARCHERS , 2003 .

[12]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Rock Fragments Control Size and Saturation of Organic Carbon Pools in Agricultural Topsoil , 2011 .

[13]  F. Ewert,et al.  Analysis of spatio-temporal patterns of CO2 and H2O fluxes in relation to crop growth under field conditions , 2015 .

[14]  Richard E. Plant,et al.  FACTORS UNDERLYING GRAIN YIELD SPATIAL VARIABILITY IN THREE IRRIGATED WHEAT FIELDS , 1999 .

[15]  Hu Shi,et al.  Interpreting spatial heterogeneity of crop yield with a process model and remote sensing , 2011 .

[16]  J. Paz,et al.  Examples of strategies to analyze spatial and temporal yield variability using crop models , 2002 .

[17]  James E. Ayars,et al.  Identifying Soil Properties that Influence Cotton Yield Using Soil Sampling Directed by Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity , 2003 .

[18]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Soil Conductivity Sensing on Claypan Soils: Comparison of Electromagnetic Induction and Direct Methods , 1999 .

[19]  E. Haworth,et al.  Biological responses to the reversal of acidification in surface waters of the English Lake District. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[20]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Noninvasive Soil Water Content Measurement Using Electromagnetic Induction , 1995 .

[21]  D.J.J. Walvoort,et al.  Geostatistical monitoring of soil salinity in Uzbekistan by repeated EMI surveys , 2014 .

[22]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Electromagnetic Induction Sensing as an Indicator of Productivity on Claypan soils , 2015 .

[23]  J. Triantafilis,et al.  Mapping clay content variation using electromagnetic induction techniques , 2005 .

[24]  T. Fenton,et al.  Effect of soil compaction on organic carbon amounts and distribution, South-Central Iowa. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[25]  Michael Robertson,et al.  Opportunities and constraints for managing within-field spatial variability in Western Australian grain production , 2007 .

[26]  G. W. Buchleiter,et al.  TEMPORAL STABILITY OF SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY IN IRRIGATED SANDY FIELDS IN COLORADO , 2004 .

[27]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Three‐dimensional imaging of subsurface structural patterns using quantitative large‐scale multiconfiguration electromagnetic induction data , 2014 .

[28]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[29]  T. S. Colvin,et al.  Relationship of Corn and Soybean Yield to Soil and Terrain Properties , 2004 .

[30]  R. M. Lark,et al.  Mapping Potential Crop Management Zones within Fields: Use of Yield-map Series and Patterns of Soil Physical Properties Identified by Electromagnetic Induction Sensing , 2005, Precision Agriculture.

[31]  S. Jones,et al.  Imaging of Hill-Slope Soil Moisture Wetting Patterns in a Semi-Arid Oak Savanna Catchment Using Time-Lapse Electromagnetic Induction , 2012 .

[32]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Analysis of Spatial Factors Influencing Crop Yield , 2015 .

[33]  S. Blackmore,et al.  The Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Trends in Yield Map Data over Six Years , 2003 .

[34]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Soil electrical conductivity and topography related to yield for three contrasting soil-crop systems , 2003 .

[35]  P. Dietrich,et al.  Soil Moisture Assessment over an Alpine Hillslope with Significant Soil Heterogeneity , 2013 .

[36]  Christine A. Shoemaker,et al.  Introduction to special section on Uncertainty Assessment in Surface and Subsurface Hydrology: An overview of issues and challenges , 2009 .

[37]  H. Vereecken,et al.  A geostatistical approach to the field-scale pattern of heterotrophic soil CO2 emission using covariates , 2012, Biogeochemistry.

[38]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  Impact of Within‐Field Variability in Soil Hydraulic Properties on Transpiration Fluxes and Crop Yields: A Numerical Study , 2004 .

[39]  M. Hutchings,et al.  The effects of environmental heterogeneity on root growth and root/shoot partitioning. , 2004, Annals of botany.

[40]  D. Robinson,et al.  Time‐lapse geophysical imaging of soil moisture dynamics in tropical deltaic soils: An aid to interpreting hydrological and geochemical processes , 2009 .

[41]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  Apparent soil electrical conductivity: applications for designing and evaluating field-scale experiments , 2005 .

[42]  J. Padhi,et al.  Assessing field-scale soil water distribution with electromagnetic induction method , 2014 .

[43]  J. Deckers,et al.  World Reference Base for Soil Resources , 1998 .

[44]  W. E. Larson,et al.  Yield Mapping by Electromagnetic Induction , 1995 .

[45]  J. L. Muriel,et al.  Can Apparent Electrical Conductivity Improve the Spatial Characterization of Soil Organic Carbon? , 2009 .

[46]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Improved Characterization of Fine-Texture Soils Using On-Ground GPR Full-Waveform Inversion , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[47]  I. J. Van Wesenbeeck,et al.  ESTIMATING SPATIAL VARIATIONS OF SOIL WATER CONTENT USING NONCONTACTING ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTIVE METHODS , 1988 .

[48]  Christine M. Anderson-Cook,et al.  Differentiating Soil Types Using Electromagnetic Conductivity and Crop Yield Maps , 2002 .

[49]  P. Gerard,et al.  SELECTED SOIL PROPERTY VARIABILITY AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS WITH COTTON YIELD , 2005 .

[50]  Mark S. Seyfried,et al.  Geophysical imaging of watershed subsurface patterns and prediction of soil texture and water holding capacity , 2008 .

[51]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  Relating apparent electrical conductivity to soil properties across the north-central USA , 2005 .

[52]  T. S. Colvin,et al.  Identifying potential soybean management zones from multi-year yield data , 2005 .

[53]  Urs Schmidhalter,et al.  Characterisation of soil texture variability using the apparent soil electrical conductivity at a highly variable site , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[54]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Soil property sensing for site-specific crop management , 1996 .

[55]  D. Corwin,et al.  Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture , 2005 .

[56]  L. Alakukku,et al.  Yield variation of spring cereals in relation to selected soil physical properties on three clay soil fields , 2013 .

[57]  Andreas G. Lazari,et al.  Differences in EM-38 Readings Taken Above Crop Residues Versus Readings Taken with Instrument-Ground Contact , 2003, Precision Agriculture.

[58]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Mapping Depth to Argillic Soil Horizons Using Apparent Electrical Conductivity , 2010 .

[59]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Mapping the spatial variation of soil water content at the field scale with different ground penetrating radar techniques , 2007 .

[60]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Quantitative Two‐Layer Conductivity Inversion of Multi‐Configuration Electromagnetic Induction Measurements , 2011 .

[61]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Soil Salinity Assessment by Electromagnetic Induction of Irrigated Land , 1992 .

[62]  R. W. Groom,et al.  Vertical Spatial Sensitivity and Exploration Depth of Low‐Induction‐Number Electromagnetic‐Induction Instruments , 2007 .

[63]  G. Robertson,et al.  Management, topographical, and weather effects on spatial variability of crop grain yields , 2005 .

[64]  D. Corwin,et al.  Application of Soil Electrical Conductivity to Precision Agriculture , 2003 .

[65]  James S. Schepers,et al.  Appropriateness of Management Zones for Characterizing Spatial Variability of Soil Properties and Irrigated Corn Yields across Years , 2004, Agronomy Journal.

[66]  Thomas S. Colvin,et al.  Spatiotemporal variability of corn and soybean yield , 1997 .

[67]  N. Breda.  Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[68]  A. Blom.  Different approaches to handling vertical and streamwise sorting in modeling river morphodynamics , 2008 .

[69]  Shmulik P. Friedman,et al.  Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: a review , 2005 .

[70]  Jan Vanderborght,et al.  Electromagnetic induction calibration using apparent electrical conductivity modelling based on electrical resistivity tomography , 2010 .

[71]  Jan Vanderborght,et al.  Soil Hydraulic Parameters and Surface Soil Moisture of a Tilled Bare Soil Plot Inversely Derived from L‐Band Brightness Temperatures , 2014 .