Three-Dimensional Digital Capture of Head Size in Neonates – A Method Evaluation

Introduction The quality of neonatal care is mainly determined by long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. The neurodevelopment of preterm infants is related to postnatal head growth and depends on medical interventions such as nutritional support. Head circumference (HC) is currently used as a two-dimensional measure of head growth. Since head deformities are frequently found in preterm infants, HC may not always adequately reflect head growth. Laser aided head shape digitizers offer semiautomatic acquisition of HC and cranial volume (CrV) and could thus be useful in describing head size more precisely. Aims 1) To evaluate reproducibility of a 3D digital capture system in newborns. 2) To compare manual and digital HC measurements in a neonatal cohort. 3) To determine correlation of HC and CrV and predictive value of HC. Methods Within a twelve-month period data of head scans with a laser shape digitizer were analysed. Repeated measures were used for method evaluation. Manually and digitally acquired HC was compared. Regression analysis of HC and CrV was performed. Results Interobserver reliability was excellent for HC (bias-0.005%, 95% Limits of Agreement (LoA) −0.39–0.39%) and CrV (bias1.5%, 95%LoA-0.8–3.6%). Method comparison data was acquired from 282 infants. It revealed interchangeability of the methods (bias-0.45%; 95%LoA-4.55–3.65%) and no significant systematic or proportional differences. HC and CrV correlated (r2 = 0.859, p<0.001), performance of HC predicting CrV was poor (RSD ±24 ml). Correlation was worse in infants with lower postmenstrual age (r2 = 0.745) compared to older infants (r2 = 0.843). Discussion The current practice of measuring HC for describing head growth in preterm infants could be misleading since it does not represent a 3D approach. CrV can vary substantially in infants of equal HC. The 3D laser scanner represents a new and promising method to provide reproducible data of CrV and HC. Since it does not provide data on cerebral structures, additional imaging is required.

[1]  Mark D Geil,et al.  Comparison of Infant Head Shape Changes in Deformational Plagiocephaly Following Treatment With a Cranial Remolding Orthosis Using a Noninvasive Laser Shape Digitizer , 2006, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[2]  M. Geil,et al.  Accuracy and Reliability of a System for the Digital Capture of Infant Head Shapes in the Treatment of Cranial Deformities , 2008 .

[3]  D. Aram,et al.  Effect of very low birth weight and subnormal head size on cognitive abilities at school age. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  W. McGuire,et al.  Neurodevelopmental outcomes after preterm birth , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[6]  K. von Siebenthal,et al.  Postnatal growth in VLBW infants: significant association with neurodevelopmental outcome. , 2003, The Journal of pediatrics.

[7]  W. Bablok,et al.  A New Biometrical Procedure for Testing the Equality of Measurements from Two Different Analytical Methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part I , 1983, Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[9]  M. Georgieff,et al.  Effect of neonatal caloric deprivation on head growth and 1-year developmental status in preterm infants. , 1985, The Journal of pediatrics.

[10]  J L Marsh,et al.  Observations on a recent increase in plagiocephaly without synostosis. , 1996, Pediatrics.

[11]  B. Vohr,et al.  Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. , 2004, JAMA.

[12]  J S Krouwer,et al.  A simple, graphical method to evaluate laboratory assays. , 1995, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies.

[13]  B. Collett,et al.  Development at Age 36 Months in Children With Deformational Plagiocephaly , 2013, Pediatrics.

[14]  A. Lucas,et al.  Workshop summary: nutrition of the extremely low birth weight infant. , 1999, Pediatrics.

[15]  Serena J. Counsell,et al.  Structural linear measurements in the newborn brain: accuracy of cranial ultrasound compared to MRI , 2007, Pediatric Radiology.

[16]  R. Cooke,et al.  Postnatal malnutrition and growth retardation: an inevitable consequence of current recommendations in preterm infants? , 2001, Pediatrics.

[17]  N. Paneth,et al.  The reliability of neonatal head circumference measurement. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Regional Brain Development in Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Low-Risk Preterm Infants , 2006, Pediatrics.

[19]  S Warfield,et al.  Early assessment of brain maturation by MR imaging segmentation in neonates and premature infants. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  M. Hack,et al.  Very low birth weight infants: effects of brain growth during infancy on intelligence quotient at 3 years of age. , 1986, Pediatrics.

[21]  L. Lehtonen,et al.  Brain and Ventricles in Very Low Birth Weight Infants at Term: A Comparison Among Head Circumference, Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2009, Pediatrics.

[22]  Dietmar Stöckl,et al.  Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[23]  T. M. Cole,et al.  The relationship in neonates between clinically measured head circumference and brain volume estimated from head CT-scans. , 1999, Early human development.

[24]  L. Wrage,et al.  Growth in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Influences Neurodevelopmental and Growth Outcomes of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants , 2006, Pediatrics.

[25]  Deanne K. Thompson,et al.  Head Growth in Preterm Infants: Correlation With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Neurodevelopmental Outcome , 2008, Pediatrics.