New fully-mixed finite element methods for the Stokes–Darcy coupling☆

Abstract In this paper we introduce and analyze two new fully-mixed variational formulations for the coupling of fluid flow with porous media flow. Flows are governed by the Stokes and Darcy equations, respectively, and the corresponding transmission conditions are given by mass conservation, balance of normal forces, and the Beavers–Joseph–Saffman law. We first extend recent related results involving a pseudostress/velocity-based formulation in the fluid, and consider a fully-mixed formulation in which the main unknowns are given now by the stress, the vorticity, and the velocity, all them in the fluid, together with the velocity and the pressure in the porous medium. The aforementioned formulation is then partially augmented by introducing Galerkin least-squares type terms arising from the constitutive and equilibrium equations of the Stokes equation, and from the relation defining the vorticity in terms of the free fluid velocity. These three terms are multiplied by stabilization parameters that are chosen in such a way that the resulting continuous formulation becomes well-posed. The classical Babuska–Brezzi theory is applied to provide sufficient conditions for the well-posedness of the continuous and discrete formulations of both approaches. Next, we derive a reliable and efficient residual-based a posteriori error estimator for the augmented mixed finite element scheme. The proof of reliability makes use of the global inf–sup condition, Helmholtz decomposition, and local approximation properties of the Clement interpolant and Raviart–Thomas operator. In turn, inverse inequalities, the localization technique based on element-bubble and edge-bubble functions, and known results from previous works, are the main tools to prove the efficiency of the estimator. Finally, several numerical results illustrating the good performance of both methods, confirming the aforementioned properties of the estimator, and showing the behavior of the associated adaptive algorithm, are provided.

[1]  G. Gatica A note on the efficiency of residual-based a posteriori error estimators for some mixed finite element methods. , 2004 .

[2]  R. Hiptmair Finite elements in computational electromagnetism , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[3]  M. Discacciati,et al.  Navier–Stokes/Forchheimer models for filtration through porous media , 2013 .

[4]  Douglas N. Arnold,et al.  Mixed finite elements for elasticity , 2002, Numerische Mathematik.

[5]  Philippe G. Ciarlet,et al.  The finite element method for elliptic problems , 2002, Classics in applied mathematics.

[6]  N. Heuer,et al.  On the numerical analysis of nonlinear twofold saddle point problems , 2003 .

[7]  J. Douglas,et al.  PEERS: A new mixed finite element for plane elasticity , 1984 .

[8]  Shuyu Sun,et al.  Coupled Generalized Nonlinear Stokes Flow with Flow through a Porous Medium , 2009, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[9]  Gabriel N. Gatica,et al.  Augmented Mixed Finite Element Methods for the Stationary Stokes Equations , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  F. Z. Nouri,et al.  A new finite-element discretization of the Stokes problem coupled with the Darcy equations , 2010 .

[11]  Francisco-Javier Sayas,et al.  Analysis of fully-mixed finite element methods for the Stokes-Darcy coupled problem , 2011, Math. Comput..

[12]  G. Gatica Analysis of a new augmented mixed finite element method for linear elasticity allowing $\mathbb{RT}_0$-$\mathbb{P}_1$-$\mathbb{P}_0$ approximations , 2006 .

[13]  P. Raviart,et al.  Finite Element Approximation of the Navier-Stokes Equations , 1979 .

[14]  G. Gatica A Simple Introduction to the Mixed Finite Element Method: Theory and Applications , 2014 .

[15]  S. Meddahi,et al.  Strong coupling of finite element methods for the Stokes–Darcy problem , 2012, 1203.4717.

[16]  Gabriel N. Gatica,et al.  A Residual-Based A Posteriori Error Estimator for the Stokes-Darcy Coupled Problem , 2010, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[17]  C. P. Gupta,et al.  A family of higher order mixed finite element methods for plane elasticity , 1984 .

[18]  André Garon,et al.  Coupling Stokes and Darcy equations , 2008 .

[19]  J. Zeman,et al.  Localization analysis of an energy-based fourth-order gradient plasticity model , 2015, 1501.06788.

[20]  Salim Meddahi,et al.  A Coupled Mixed Finite Element Method for the Interaction Problem between an Electromagnetic Field and an Elastic Body , 2010, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[21]  N. Heuer,et al.  A residual based a posteriori error estimator for an augmented mixed finite element method in linear elasticity , 2006 .

[22]  Willi Jäger,et al.  On The Interface Boundary Condition of Beavers, Joseph, and Saffman , 2000, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[23]  Salim Meddahi,et al.  Analysis of the Coupling of Primal and Dual-Mixed Finite Element Methods for a Two-Dimensional Fluid-Solid Interaction Problem , 2007, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[24]  L. D. Marini,et al.  Two families of mixed finite elements for second order elliptic problems , 1985 .

[25]  G. Gatica An augmented mixed finite element method for linear elasticity with non-homogeneous Dirichlet conditions. , 2007 .

[26]  Rüdiger Verfürth,et al.  On the stability of BDMS and PEERS elements , 2004, Numerische Mathematik.

[27]  Carsten Carstensen,et al.  A posteriori error estimates for mixed FEM in elasticity , 1998, Numerische Mathematik.

[28]  Fédérale De Lausanne,et al.  DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS FOR THE COUPLING OF SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER FLOWS , 2004 .

[29]  Béatrice Rivière,et al.  Analysis of a Discontinuous Finite Element Method for the Coupled Stokes and Darcy Problems , 2005, J. Sci. Comput..

[30]  Carsten Carstensen,et al.  A posteriori error estimate for the mixed finite element method , 1997, Math. Comput..

[31]  D. Joseph,et al.  Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[32]  Xiaoping,et al.  UNIFORMLY-STABLE FINITE ELEMENT METHODS FOR DARCY-STOKES-BRINKMAN MODELS , 2008 .

[33]  Michel Fortin,et al.  Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods , 2011, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics.

[34]  G. Gatica,et al.  A conforming mixed finite-element method for the coupling of fluid flow with porous media flow , 2008 .

[35]  Rüdiger Verfürth,et al.  A posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh-refinement techniques , 1994 .

[36]  Béatrice Rivière,et al.  Locally Conservative Coupling of Stokes and Darcy Flows , 2005 .

[37]  J. Galvis,et al.  NON-MATCHING MORTAR DISCRETIZATION ANALYSIS FOR THE COUPLING STOKES-DARCY EQUATIONS , 2007 .

[38]  G. Gatica,et al.  Analysis of a velocity–pressure–pseudostress formulation for the stationary Stokes equations ☆ , 2010 .

[39]  Salim Meddahi,et al.  A residual-based a posteriori error estimator for a two-dimensional fluid–solid interaction problem , 2009, Numerische Mathematik.

[40]  Francisco-Javier Sayas,et al.  A twofold saddle point approach for the coupling of fluid flow with nonlinear porous media flow , 2012 .

[41]  G. Gatica,et al.  A residual-based a posteriori error estimator for a fully-mixed formulation of the Stokes–Darcy coupled problem , 2011 .

[42]  Numedsche,et al.  A Family of Mixed Finite Elements for the Elasticity Problem , 2022 .

[43]  Shuyu Sun,et al.  Coupling nonlinear Stokes and Darcy flow using mortar finite elements , 2011 .

[44]  Frédéric Hecht,et al.  Coupling Darcy and Stokes equations for porous media with cracks , 2005 .

[45]  P. Clément Approximation by finite element functions using local regularization , 1975 .

[46]  Trygve K. Karper,et al.  Unified finite element discretizations of coupled Darcy–Stokes flow , 2009 .

[47]  E. Miglio,et al.  Mathematical and numerical models for coupling surface and groundwater flows , 2002 .

[48]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[49]  Norbert Heuer,et al.  A priori and a posteriori error analysis of an augmented mixed finite element method for incompressible fluid flows , 2008 .

[50]  Ivan Yotov,et al.  Coupling Fluid Flow with Porous Media Flow , 2002, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..