The Evolution of Epistasis and Its Links With Genetic Robustness, Complexity and Drift in a Phenotypic Model of Adaptation

The epistatic interactions among mutations have a large effect on the evolution of populations. In this article we provide a formalism under which epistatic interactions among pairs of mutations have a distribution whose mean can be modulated. We find that the mean epistasis is correlated to the effect of mutations or genetic robustness, which suggests that such formalism is in good agreement with most in silico models of evolution where the same pattern is observed. We further show that the evolution of epistasis is highly dependant on the intensity of drift and of how complex the organisms are, and that either positive or negative epistasis could be selected for, depending on the balance between the efficiency of selection and the intensity of drift.

[1]  I. Matic,et al.  Evolution of mutation rates in bacteria , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[2]  Hervé Le Nagard,et al.  Mutators, population size, adaptive landscape and the adaptation of asexual populations of bacteria. , 1999, Genetics.

[3]  C. Wilke,et al.  Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  C. Petropoulos,et al.  Evidence for Positive Epistasis in HIV-1 , 2004, Science.

[5]  U. Alon,et al.  Spontaneous evolution of modularity and network motifs. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Lior Pachter,et al.  Analysis of epistatic interactions and fitness landscapes using a new geometric approach , 2007, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[7]  Art Poon,et al.  Drift Increases the Advantage of Sex in RNA Bacteriophage Φ6 , 2004, Genetics.

[8]  N. Barton,et al.  SELECTION FOR RECOMBINATION IN SMALL POPULATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  S. Elena,et al.  The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  H. A. Orr,et al.  ADAPTATION AND THE COST OF COMPLEXITY , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  Thomas Nyström,et al.  Genomic buffering mitigates the effects of deleterious mutations in bacteria , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[13]  D. Butcher,et al.  Muller's ratchet, epistasis and mutation effects. , 1995, Genetics.

[14]  T. Lenormand,et al.  A GENERAL MULTIVARIATE EXTENSION OF FISHER'S GEOMETRICAL MODEL AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF MUTATION FITNESS EFFECTS ACROSS SPECIES , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  R. Korona,et al.  Epistatic buffering of fitness loss in yeast double deletion strains , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[16]  O. Tenaillon,et al.  Selection for Chaperone-Like Mediated Genetic Robustness at Low Mutation Rate: Impact of Drift, Epistasis and Complexity , 2009, Genetics.

[17]  M. Feldman,et al.  On the evolution of epistasis III: the haploid case with mutation. , 2008, Theoretical population biology.

[18]  C. Wilke.  SELECTION FOR FITNESS VERSUS SELECTION FOR ROBUSTNESS IN RNA SECONDARY STRUCTURE FOLDING , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  M. Kimura,et al.  The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. , 1966, Genetics.

[20]  S. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Effect of Varying Epistasis on the Evolution of Recombination , 2006, Genetics.

[21]  Clifford H. Taubes,et al.  Towards a theory of evolutionary adaptation , 2004, Genetica.

[22]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[23]  J. Welch,et al.  Fisher’s Microscope and Haldane’s Ellipse , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[24]  J. Haigh.  The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[25]  Sebastian Bonhoeffer,et al.  Epistasis between deleterious mutations and the evolution of recombination. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  C. Ofria,et al.  Sexual reproduction reshapes the genetic architecture of digital organisms , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Rafael Sanjuán,et al.  Epistasis correlates to genomic complexity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[29]  H. A. Orr,et al.  THE POPULATION GENETICS OF ADAPTATION: THE DISTRIBUTION OF FACTORS FIXED DURING ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations in Fisher's geometric model of adaptation. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  Art Poon,et al.  COMPENSATING FOR OUR LOAD OF MUTATIONS: FREEZING THE MELTDOWN OF SMALL POPULATIONS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  D. Krakauer,et al.  Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the robustness of genomes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  J. D. de Visser,et al.  An experimental test for synergistic epistasis and its application in Chlamydomonas. , 1997, Genetics.

[34]  C. Goodnight.  EPISTASIS AND THE EFFECT OF FOUNDER EVENTS ON THE ADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  Thomas Lenormand,et al.  Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[36]  Amit R. Puniyani,et al.  On the evolution of epistasis II: a generalized Wright-Kimura framework. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[37]  L. Chao,et al.  Understanding the Evolutionary Fate of Finite Populations: The Dynamics of Mutational Effects , 2007, PLoS biology.

[38]  V. Pande,et al.  On the application of statistical physics to evolutionary biology. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  Christoph Adami,et al.  Thermodynamic prediction of protein neutrality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  M. Feldman,et al.  Evolutionary theory for modifiers of epistasis using a general symmetric model , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  L. Chao,et al.  Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus phi6. , 1999, Genetics.

[42]  M. Meselson,et al.  Rates of nucleotide substitution in sexual and anciently asexual rotifers , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  D. Hartl,et al.  Compensatory nearly neutral mutations: selection without adaptation. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[44]  M. Kimura,et al.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. , 1962, Genetics.

[45]  N. Barton,et al.  Evolution of Recombination Due to Random Drift , 2005, Genetics.

[46]  Andy Gardner,et al.  Recombination and the evolution of mutational robustness. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[47]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The evolutionary genetics of adaptation: a simulation study. , 1999, Genetical research.

[48]  R. Lenski,et al.  Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria , 1997, Nature.

[49]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. , 1993, Genetics.

[50]  G. Wagner,et al.  Epistasis and the mutation load: a measurement-theoretical approach. , 2001, Genetics.

[51]  S. Frank.  Title Maladaptation and the Paradox of Robustness in Evolution Permalink , 2007 .

[52]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Muller's ratchet under epistatic selection. , 1994, Genetics.

[53]  Olivier Tenaillon,et al.  Quantifying Organismal Complexity using a Population Genetic Approach , 2007, PloS one.

[54]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Robustness–epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein , 2006, Nature.

[55]  J. D. de Visser,et al.  The effect of sex and deleterious mutations on fitness in Chlamydomonas , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  Kristen K. Dang,et al.  Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks , 2006, Nature.

[57]  M. Feldman,et al.  On the evolution of epistasis I: diploids under selection. , 2005, Theoretical population biology.

[58]  G. Wagner,et al.  QUANTITATIVE VARIATION IN FINITE PARTHENOGENETIC POPULATIONS: WHAT STOPS MULLER'S RATCHET IN THE ABSENCE OF RECOMBINATION? , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[59]  Christina L. Burch,et al.  Epistasis and Its Relationship to Canalization in the RNA Virus φ6 , 2004, Genetics.

[60]  Daniel B. Weissman,et al.  Evolution Can Favor Antagonistic Epistasis , 2007, Genetics.

[61]  L. Hurst.  Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process , 2000, Heredity.

[62]  S. Elena,et al.  Epistasis and the Adaptability of an RNA Virus , 2005, Genetics.

[63]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Unravelling the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex : a Commentary on ' Mutation–selection Balance and the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex and Recombination ' , 2022 .