Long-term stability at fuel processing of diesel and kerosene

Abstract The long-term stability at autothermal reforming of diesel fuel and kerosene was studied using Juelich's autothermal reformer ATR 9.2, which is equipped with a commercial proprietary RhPt/Al 2 O 3 –CeO 2 catalyst. The experiment was run for 10,000 h of time on stream at constant reaction conditions with an O 2 /C molar ratio of 0.47, a H 2 O/C molar ratio of 1.9, and a gas hourly space velocity of 30,000 h −1 . Kerosene produced via the gas-to-liquid process and diesel fuel synthesized via the bio-to-liquid route were used. Both fuels were almost free of mass fractions of sulfur and aromatics. The trends for the desired main products of autothermal reforming H 2 , CO, CO 2 , and CH 4 were almost stable when kerosene was used. When the fuel mass flow was switched to diesel fuel however, different modes of catalyst deactivation occurred (active sites blocked by carbonaceous deposits, sintering processes), leading to a decrease in the concentrations of H 2 and CO 2 with a simultaneous increase in the CO content. This paper defines carbon conversion as the decisive criterion for evaluating the long-term stability during autothermal reforming of kerosene and diesel fuel. Carbon conversion was diminished via three different pathways during the long-term experiment. Undesired byproducts found in the gas phase leaving the reactor had the strongest impact on carbon conversion. These byproducts included ethene, propene, and benzene. Furthermore, a liquid oily residue was detected floating on the condensed unconverted mass flow of water. This happened once during the whole experiment. Finally, undesired organic byproducts were dissolved in the mass flow of unconverted water. These were found to be straight-chain and branched paraffins, esters, alcohols, acids, aldehydes, ketones, etc. Nevertheless, at the end of the long-term experiment, carbon conversion still amounted to more than 98.2%.

[1]  Theodore R. Krause,et al.  Effect of temperature, steam-to-carbon ratio, and alkali metal additives on improving the sulfur tolerance of a Rh/La–Al2O3 catalyst reforming gasoline for fuel cell applications , 2008 .

[2]  John P. Baltrus,et al.  Characterization of coke deposited on Pt/alumina catalyst during reforming of liquid hydrocarbons , 2005 .

[3]  Thomas Aicher,et al.  Fuel processors for fuel cell APU applications , 2006 .

[4]  Sangho Yoon,et al.  Self-sustained operation of a kWe-class kerosene-reforming processor for solid oxide fuel cells , 2009 .

[5]  H. Vesala,et al.  Experimental Study of an SOFC Stack Operated With Autothermally Reformed Diesel Fuel , 2013 .

[6]  Lars J. Pettersson,et al.  Autothermal reforming of Fischer–Tropsch diesel over alumina and ceria–zirconia supported catalysts , 2013 .

[7]  Marianna Kemell,et al.  Zirconia-supported bimetallic RhPt catalysts: Characterization and testing in autothermal reforming of simulated gasoline , 2008 .

[8]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Optimised Mixture Formation for Diesel Fuel Processing , 2008 .

[9]  Xanthias Karatzas,et al.  Microemulsion and incipient wetness prepared Rh-based catalyst for diesel reforming , 2011 .

[10]  M. Harada,et al.  Hydrogen production by autothermal reforming of kerosene over MgAlOx-supported Rh catalysts , 2009 .

[11]  R. C. Samsun,et al.  Fuel Processing of Diesel and Kerosene for Auxiliary Power Unit Applications , 2013 .

[12]  Xanthias Karatzas,et al.  Zone-coated Rh-based monolithic catalyst for autothermal reforming of diesel , 2011 .

[13]  Sangho Yoon,et al.  A diesel fuel processor for stable operation of solid oxide fuel cells system: II. Integrated diesel fuel processor for the operation of solid oxide fuel cells , 2012 .

[14]  Lars J. Pettersson,et al.  Autothermal reforming of low-sulfur diesel over bimetallic RhPt supported on Al2O3, CeO2–ZrO2, SiO2 and TiO2 , 2011 .

[15]  Theodore R. Krause,et al.  Role of the oxide support on the performance of Rh catalysts for the autothermal reforming of gasoline and gasoline surrogates to hydrogen , 2006 .

[16]  A. Lindermeir,et al.  On-board diesel fuel processing for an SOFC–APU—Technical challenges for catalysis and reactor design , 2007 .

[17]  Gunther Kolb,et al.  Development and evaluation of a microreactor for the reforming of diesel fuel in the kW range , 2009 .

[18]  K. Bächmann,et al.  Determination of inorganic anions, carboxylic acids and amino acids in plant matrices by capillary zone electrophoresis , 1997 .

[19]  A. Outi I. Krause,et al.  Autothermal reforming of simulated and commercial diesel: The performance of zirconia-supported RhPt catalyst in the presence of sulfur , 2008 .

[20]  D. Creaser,et al.  Hydrogen generation from n-tetradecane, low-sulfur and Fischer-Tropsch diesel over Rh supported on alumina doped with ceria/lanthana , 2011 .

[21]  J. Schwank,et al.  Effect of metal particle size on sulfur tolerance of Ni catalysts during autothermal reforming of isooctane , 2011 .

[22]  P. Ekdunge,et al.  Diesel fuel reformer for automotive fuel cell applications , 2009 .

[23]  R. C. Samsun,et al.  Autothermal reforming of commercial Jet A-1 on a 5kWe scale , 2007 .

[24]  Sangho Yoon,et al.  Suppression of ethylene-induced carbon deposition in diesel autothermal reforming , 2009 .

[25]  Thomas Aicher,et al.  Catalytic autothermal reforming of Jet fuel , 2005 .