Control Issues in Reduced-Order Feedback Flow Control

Technological advances in sensors, actuators, on-board computational capability, modeling and control sciences have offered a possibility of seriously considering closed-loop flow control for practical applications. We can now attempt to address problems that have over the years not been effectively been solved using passive means and /or open-loop techniques. The main strategies to closed-loop control are a model-independent approach, a full-order optimal control approach based on the Navier Stokes solution and a reduced order model strategy. The current effort emphasizes methodology based on low-dimensional, proper orthogonal decomposition applied to the suppression of periodic vortex shedding in the wake of a circular cylinder. Focus is on the validity of the low-dimensional model, selection of the important modes that need representation, incorporation of an ensemble of snapshots that reflect vital transient phenomena, selection of sensor placement and number, and linear stochastic estimation for mapping of sensor data onto modal information. Furthermore, additional issues surveyed include observability, controllability and stability of the closed-loop systems based on low-dimensional models. Examples based on computational and experimental studies on the cylinder wake benchmark are presented to illuminate some of the important issues. We achieved a drag reduction of close to 90% of the vortex-induced drag, and lowered the unsteady lift force by the same amount. Finally, the paper summarizes some of the important lessons learned and notes on open issues for future research. Nomenclature

[1]  Kimon Roussopoulos,et al.  Feedback control of vortex shedding at low Reynolds numbers , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  Marco Debiasi,et al.  Development of Closed-loop Control for Cavity Flows , 2003 .

[3]  Avi Seifert,et al.  Closed-loop vectoring control of a turbulent jet using periodic excitation , 2003 .

[4]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Modern developments in flow control , 1996 .

[5]  Kelly Cohen,et al.  Sensor Placement Based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Modeling of a Cylinder Wake , 2003 .

[6]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Non-linear dynamical control systems , 1990 .

[7]  P. Glendinning Stability, Instability and Chaos: An Introduction to the Theory of Nonlinear Differential Equations , 1994 .

[8]  Stefan Siegel,et al.  FEEDBACK CONTROL OF A CIRCULAR CYLINDER WAKE IN EXPERIMENT AND SIMULATION (INVITED) , 2003 .

[9]  L. Sirovich Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures , 1987 .

[10]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2024 .

[11]  Stability, Instability and Chaos: STABILITY , 1994 .

[12]  Paul Glendinning,et al.  Stability, instability and chaos , by Paul Glendinning. Pp. 402. £45. 1994. ISBN 0 521 41553 5 (hardback); £17.95 ISBN 0 521 42566 2 (paperback) (Cambridge). , 1997, The Mathematical Gazette.

[13]  Pierre Albarede,et al.  Quasi-periodic cylinder wakes and the Ginzburg–Landau model , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Flow similitude and vortex lock-on in bluff body near wakes , 1989 .

[15]  Avi Seifert,et al.  Active Control of Cylinder Flow with and without a Splitter Plate using , 2002 .

[16]  E. A. Gillies Low-dimensional control of the circular cylinder wake , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  M. Balas Active control of flexible systems , 1978 .

[18]  Robert King,et al.  Model-based Control of Vortex Shedding Using Low-dimensional Galerkin Models , 2003 .

[19]  Peter A. Monkewitz Modeling of self-excited wake oscillations by amplitude equations , 1996 .

[20]  R. Temam,et al.  On some control problems in fluid mechanics , 1990 .

[21]  Avi Seifert,et al.  Closed-loop separation control using oscillatory flow excitation , 2000 .

[22]  Gilead Tadmor,et al.  Observer-based control of vortex motion in a combustor recirculation region , 2002, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[23]  Wr Graham,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL OF VORTEX SHEDDING USING LOW-ORDER MODELS. PART I-OPEN-LOOP MODEL DEVELOPMENT , 1999 .

[24]  G. H. Koopmann,et al.  The vortex wakes of vibrating cylinders at low Reynolds numbers , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  P. Holmes,et al.  Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry , 1996 .

[26]  Kelly Cohen,et al.  Low-Dimensional Feedback Control of the Von Karman Vortex Street at a Reynolds Number of 100 , 2003 .

[27]  E. A. Gillies,et al.  Feedback Control of a Cylinder Wake Low-Dimensional Model , 2003 .

[28]  Ronald Adrian,et al.  On the role of conditional averages in turbulence theory. , 1975 .

[29]  Kelly Cohen,et al.  FEEDBACK CONTROL OF A CIRCULAR CYLINDER WAKE IN A WATER TUNNEL EXPERIMENT , 2004 .

[30]  Kelly Cohen,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Modeling of a Controlled Ginzburg-Landau Cylinder Wake Model , 2003 .

[31]  J. Peraire,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL OF VORTEX SHEDDING USING LOW-ORDER MODELS. PART II-MODEL-BASED CONTROL , 1999 .

[32]  James H. Myatt,et al.  Real-Time Particle Image Velocimetry for Closed-Loop Flow Control Studies , 2003 .

[33]  S. Siegel,et al.  Determination of an Effective Sensor Configuration for Suppression of the von Kármán Vortex Street , 2004 .

[34]  Kelly Cohen,et al.  FUZZY LOGIC CONTROL OF A CIRCULAR CYLINDER VORTEX SHEDDING MODEL , 2003 .

[35]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Dynamics And Control Of Structures , 1990 .