OBJECTIVE
The objective of the present study is to evaluate and compare the flexural strength, dynamic elastic moduli and true hardness (H(o)) values of commercial Vita In-Ceram alumina core and Vita In-Ceram matrix glass with the standard aluminous porcelain (Hi-Ceram and Vitadur), Vitadur N and Dicor glass and glass-ceramic.
METHODS
The flexural strength was evaluated (n=5) using 3-point loading and a servo hydraulic Instron testing machine at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. The density of the specimens (n=3) was measured by means of the water displacement technique. Dynamic Young's shear and bulk moduli and Poisson's ratio (n=3) were measured using a non-destructive ultrasonic technique using 10 MHz lithium niobate crystals. The true hardness (n=3) was measured using a Knoop indenter and the fracture toughness (n=3) was determined using a Vickers indenter and a Tukon hardness tester. Statistical analysis of the data was conducted using ANOVA and a Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) rank order multiple comparative test.
RESULTS
The SNK rank order test analysis of the mean flexural strength was able to separate five commercial core materials into three significant groups at p=0.05. Vita In-Ceram alumina and IPS Empress 2 exhibited significantly higher flexural strength than aluminous porcelains and IPS Empress at p=0.05. The dynamic elastic moduli and true hardness of Vita In-Ceram alumina core were significantly higher than the rest of the commercial ceramic core materials at p=0.05.
SIGNIFICANCE
The ultrasonic test method is a valuable mechanical characterization tool and was able to statistically discriminate between the chemical and structural differences within dental ceramic materials. Significant correlation was obtained between the dynamic Young's modulus and true hardness, p=0.05.
[1]
Asish Ghosh,et al.
Indentation Fracture Toughness of Sintered Silicon Carbide in the Palmqvist Crack Regime
,
1989
.
[2]
David W. Richerson,et al.
Modern ceramic engineering: Properties, processing and use in design
,
2018
.
[3]
Adair Pj,et al.
The castable ceramic crown.
,
1984
.
[4]
G. Dénès,et al.
Reaction of SnF2 and MCl (M=Na, K, and NH4) in aqueous solutions
,
1988
.
[5]
A. Rizkalla,et al.
Indentation fracture toughness and dynamic young's modulus of ceramic biomaterials
,
1988
.
[6]
J W McLean,et al.
The science and art of dental ceramics.
,
1991,
Operative dentistry.
[7]
H. Strunk,et al.
Microstructure of a high strength alumina glass composite
,
1996
.
[8]
D. W. Jones.
The strength and strengthening mechanisms of dental ceramics
,
1983
.
[9]
D. G. Grossman,et al.
The castable ceramic crown.
,
1984,
The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.
[10]
Amin S Rizkalla,et al.
Indentation fracture toughness and dynamic elastic moduli for commercial feldspathic dental porcelain materials.
,
2004,
Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[11]
M. Frank,et al.
A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress 2 and the IPS Empress glass-ceramics.
,
2000,
Journal of biomedical materials research.