Can executive information systems reinforce biases

Abstract Executive information systems represent a significant departure from traditional computer-based information systems. Advocates of executive systems claim that their systems offer the leading-edge option for making computers truly effective for supporting key management functions. This paper examines the interaction between key characteristics of executive systems and fundamental features of human thinking drawn from the field of Behavioral Decision Theory. We examine the possibility that the operation of these systems may reinforce or intensify certain biases in human information processing. We present three examples of potential bias-intensification: availability, regression effects, and overconfidence. Next, the paper applies the concept of decisional guidance to develop design implications for executive systems. Lastly, the paper offers avenues for theoretical development and empirical research.

[1]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. , 1978 .

[2]  McCann Je,et al.  Diagnosing organizational decision making through responsibility charting. , 1983 .

[3]  Robert Thierauf,et al.  Executive Information Systems: A Guide for Senior Management and MIS Professionals , 1991 .

[4]  Yaacov Y. I. Vertzberger.  The World in Their Minds: Information Processing, Cognition, and Perception in Foreign Policy Decisionmaking , 1990 .

[5]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[6]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[7]  H. Igor Ansoff,et al.  Implanting Strategic Management , 1984 .

[8]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[9]  D. O. Sears.  College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[10]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Training for calibration. , 1980 .

[11]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[12]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Determining information requirements for an executive information system , 1992 .

[13]  D. Campbell.  Reforms as experiments , 1969 .

[14]  Charles H. Schwenk.  Information, Cognitive Biases, and Commitment to a Course of Action , 1986 .

[15]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Behavioral and Organizational Considerations in the Design of Information Systems and Processes for Planning and Decision Support , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[17]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .

[18]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[19]  Ronald N. Taylor.  Behavioral decision making , 1984 .

[20]  A. Ramaprasad,et al.  Mental models, cognitive dissonance and executive information systems' effectiveness , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  I. Janis.  Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[23]  M. Bazerman,et al.  BLIND SPOTS IN INDUSTRY AND COMPETITOR ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS OF INTERFIRM (MIS)PERCEPTIONS FOR STRATEGIC DECISIONS , 1991 .

[24]  Edward J. Joyce,et al.  Anchoring and Adjustment In Probabilistic Inference in Auditing , 1981 .

[25]  Pien Wang,et al.  Filtering strategic environmental information processing using EIS , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[26]  Spyros Makridakis,et al.  Forecasting Methods for Management , 1989 .

[27]  J. March.  Ambiguity and accounting: The elusive link between information and decision making☆ , 1987 .

[28]  Christine T. Kydd,et al.  Cognitive biases in the use of computer-based decision support systems , 1989 .

[29]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Decision Support Systems: Directed and Nondirected Change , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Alfred J. Nanni,et al.  MIS Influences on Managers: Hidden Side Effects , 1988 .

[31]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Executive Information Systems: A Framework for Development and a Survey of Current Practices , 1991, MIS Q..

[32]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  The Strategic Business Objectives Method for Guiding Executive Information Systems Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  S. Oskamp.  OVERCONFIDENCE IN CASE-STUDY JUDGMENTS. , 1965, Journal of consulting psychology.

[34]  R. Jervis.  Perception and misperception in international politics , 1976 .

[35]  J. Rockart.  The changing role of the information systems executive : a critical success factors perspective , 1982 .

[36]  E. Langer.  The Psychology Of Control , 1983 .

[37]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Decision impelling differences: An investigation of management by exception reporting , 1981, Inf. Manag..

[38]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. , 1978 .

[39]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Decision support and expert systems , 1993 .

[40]  J. Rockart.  Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[42]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .

[43]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .

[44]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Descriptive Analysis for Computer-Based Decision Support: Special Focus Article , 1988, Oper. Res..

[45]  H. Dreyfus.  What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence , 1978 .

[46]  Hugh J. Watson.  Avoiding hidden EIS pitfalls , 1993 .

[47]  James C. Wetherbe.  Executive Information Requirements: Getting It Right , 1991, MIS Q..

[48]  Sten Jönsson,et al.  Designing semi-confusing information systems for organizations in changing environments , 1978 .

[49]  S. Lichtenstein,et al.  Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?*1 , 1977 .

[50]  G. Huber.  The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations , 1984 .

[51]  M. Bazerman.  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[52]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[53]  J. F. Rockart,et al.  The CEO goes on-line , 1989 .

[54]  John F. Rockart,et al.  Executive Support Systems: The Emergence of Top Management Computer Use , 1988 .

[55]  K. Rapley,et al.  Factors critical to the success of executive information systems in British Airways , 1991 .

[56]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[57]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Decisional Guidance for Computer-Based Decision Support , 1991, MIS Q..

[58]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. , 1971 .

[59]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[60]  Andrew P. Sage.  Decision support systems engineering , 1991 .