Assessment of the fire toxicity of building insulation materials

A significant element in the cost of a new building is devoted to fire safety. Energy efficiency drives the replacement of traditional building materials with lightweight insulation materials, which, if flammable can contribute to the fire load. Most fire deaths arise from inhalation of toxic gases. The fire toxicity of six insulation materials (glass wool, stone wool, expanded polystyrene foam, phenolic foam, polyurethane foam and polyisocyanurate foam) was investigated under a range of fire conditions. Two of the materials, stone wool and glass wool failed to ignite and gave consistently low yields of all of the toxic products. The toxicities of the effluents, showing the contribution of individual toxic components, are compared using the fractional effective dose (FED) model and LC50 (the mass required per unit volume to generate a lethal atmosphere under specified conditions). For polyisocyanurate and polyurethane foam this shows a significant contribution from hydrogen cyanide resulting in doubling of the overall toxicity, as the fire condition changes from well-ventilated to under-ventilated. These materials showed an order of increasing fire toxicity, from stone wool (least toxic), glass wool, polystyrene, phenolic, polyurethane to polyisocyanurate foam (most toxic).

[1]  Mohammad S. Al-Homoud,et al.  Performance characteristics and practical applications of common building thermal insulation materials , 2005 .

[2]  Anna A. Stec,et al.  Comparison of toxic product yields from bench-scale to ISO room , 2009 .

[3]  Agis M. Papadopoulos,et al.  State of the art in thermal insulation materials and aims for future developments , 2005 .

[4]  Marcelo M. Hirschler Critique of "ISO TS 13571 - 2002 - Life-threatening components of fire — Guidelines for the estimation of time available for escape using fire data" , 2005 .

[5]  D. Purser Toxic product yields and hazard assessment for fully enclosed design fires , 2000 .

[6]  Han-Hsi Liang,et al.  Toxicity characteristics of commercially manufactured insulation materials for building applications in Taiwan , 2007 .

[7]  T. R. Hull,et al.  Combustion toxicity of fire retarded EVA , 2002 .

[8]  Harpal Singh,et al.  Ignition, combustion, toxicity, and fire retardancy of polyurethane foams: A comprehensive review , 2008 .

[9]  T. R. Hull,et al.  Prediction of CO evolution from small‐scale polymer fires , 2000 .

[10]  T. R. Hull,et al.  Bench-scale assessment of combustion toxicity—A critical analysis of current protocols , 2007 .

[11]  Per Blomqvist,et al.  Isocyanates, aminoisocyanates and amines from fires—a screening of common materials found in buildings , 2003 .

[12]  Charles A. Wilkie,et al.  Fire and Polymers IV: Materials and Concepts for Hazard Prevention , 2005 .

[13]  Lene Smith-Hansen,et al.  Reduced combustion efficiency of chlorinated compounds, resulting in higher yields of carbon monoxide , 1995 .

[14]  William M. Pitts,et al.  The global equivalence ratio concept and the formation mechanisms of carbon monoxide in enclosure fires , 1995 .

[15]  A. Stec,et al.  Characterisation of the steady state tube furnace (ISO TS 19700) for fire toxicity assessment , 2008 .