Who May Benefit From Armeo Power Treatment? A Neurophysiological Approach to Predict Neurorehabilitation Outcomes

The Armeo Power, a rehabilitation exoskeleton that allows early treatment of motor disabilities, provides intelligent arm support in a large 3‐dimensional work space, thus enabling patients to perform intensive, repetitive, and goal‐oriented exercises. This device could efficiently induce new connections and facilitate plasticity phenomena potentiation. Knowledge of the potential brain plasticity reservoir after brain damage constitutes a prerequisite for an optimal rehabilitation strategy.

[1]  Leonardo G. Cohen,et al.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation , 2006, NeuroRX.

[2]  Domenico Formica,et al.  Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation , 2014, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[3]  C. Lang,et al.  Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[4]  H. Siebner,et al.  Abnormal associative plasticity of the human motor cortex in writer's cramp. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  E. P. Soler,et al.  Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Cerebral Ischemia and Ischemic Heart Diseases: Similarities and Differences , 2010, Current cardiology reviews.

[6]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Interhemispheric Competition After Stroke: Brain Stimulation to Enhance Recovery of Function of the Affected Hand , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  Carl Machover,et al.  Virtual reality , 1994, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[8]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Automating Arm Movement Training Following Severe Stroke: Functional Exercises With Quantitative Feedback in a Gravity-Reduced Environment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  J. Ferri,et al.  Efficacy of Armeo® Spring during the chronic phase of stroke. Study in mild to moderate cases of hemiparesis. , 2013, Neurologia.

[10]  P. Rossini,et al.  Neuronal post-stroke plasticity in the adult. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[11]  M. Levin,et al.  Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Meta-Analysis and Implications for Clinicians , 2011, Stroke.

[12]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Freebal: Design of a Dedicated Weight-Support System for Upper-Extremity Rehabilitation , 2009 .

[13]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  H Poizner,et al.  Virtual reality-based post-stroke hand rehabilitation. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[15]  N. Takeuchi,et al.  Maladaptive Plasticity for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Approaches , 2012, Neural plasticity.

[16]  M. Hallett,et al.  Spinal motor neuron excitability during the silent period after cortical stimulation. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Timing-Dependent Modulation of Associative Plasticity by General Network Excitability in the Human Motor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The cortical silent period: intrinsic variability and relation to the waveform of the transcranial magnetic stimulation pulse , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  A Berardelli,et al.  Silent period evoked by transcranial stimulation of the human cortex and cervicomedullary junction. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  P. Ashby,et al.  Mechanism of the silent period following transcranial magnetic stimulation Evidence from epidural recordings , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  M. Hamilton A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION , 1960, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with positron emission tomography , 1991, Annals of neurology.

[23]  M. Hallett Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Primer , 2007, Neuron.

[24]  B. C. Harmeling-van der Wel,et al.  Hierarchical Properties of the Motor Function Sections of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale for People After Stroke: A Retrospective Study , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[25]  P. Rossini,et al.  Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.

[26]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[27]  Mary Y. Harley,et al.  A Novel Functional Electrical Stimulation Treatment for Recovery of Hand Function in Hemiplegia: 12-Week Pilot Study , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[28]  M. Levin,et al.  What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[29]  P M Rossini,et al.  Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2-4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  D. White,et al.  Measures of adult general functional status: SF‐36 Physical Functioning Subscale (PF‐10), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Osteoarthritis‐Functi , 2011, Arthritis care & research.

[31]  Julius P. A. Dewald,et al.  Ipsilateral versus contralateral cortical motor projections to a shoulder adductor in chronic hemiparetic stroke: implications for the expression of arm synergies , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  M. Hallett,et al.  Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans , 1997, Nature.

[33]  P M Rossini,et al.  Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. , 1997, Stroke.

[34]  Jane Epstein,et al.  Neural Plasticity After Acquired Brain Injury: Evidence from Functional Neuroimaging , 2010, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[35]  B. Hamilton A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. , 1987 .

[36]  Peter Oster,et al.  Rehabilitation after stroke. , 2011, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[37]  S. Miller,et al.  Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  B. Bussel,et al.  Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients , 2003, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[39]  J. Henson,et al.  Plasticity , 2010, Neurology.

[40]  T. Schallert Behavioral tests for preclinical intervention assessment , 2006, NeuroRX.

[41]  R. Nudo,et al.  Shaping plasticity to enhance recovery after injury. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[42]  L. Kiers Magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex: Clinical applications , 1997, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[43]  Leonardo G. Cohen,et al.  Effects of Somatosensory Stimulation on Motor Function After Subacute Stroke , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[44]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Cerebral Oxygen Metabolism and Blood Flow in Human Cerebral Ischemic Infarction , 1982, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[46]  Ya-Chen Lee,et al.  The impact of stroke: insights from patients in Taiwan. , 2010, Occupational therapy international.

[47]  A. Geurts,et al.  Predicting Hand Motor Recovery in Severe Stroke: The Role of Motor Evoked Potentials in Relation to Early Clinical Assessment , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[48]  C. Colomer,et al.  Eficacia del sistema Armeo ®Spring en la fase crónica del ictus. Estudio en hemiparesias leves-moderadas , 2013 .

[49]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[50]  L. Cohen,et al.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  J. Baron,et al.  Do changes in oxygen metabolism in the unaffected cerebral hemisphere underlie early neurological recovery after stroke? A positron emission tomography study. , 1996, Stroke.

[52]  R. Riener,et al.  Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[53]  A. Gentile,et al.  Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[54]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[55]  C. Halldin,et al.  A PET study of , 2000, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[56]  S. Rossi,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[57]  L. Cohen,et al.  Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[58]  S. Masiero,et al.  Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[59]  M. Leathley,et al.  Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[60]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the `affected' and `unaffected' hemispheres in human stroke , 1998, Brain Research.

[61]  Andreas R. Luft,et al.  Cortical Plasticity during Motor Learning and Recovery after Ischemic Stroke , 2011, Neural plasticity.

[62]  R. Nudo,et al.  Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[63]  J. Ferri,et al.  Efficacy of Armeo® Spring during the chronic phase of stroke. Study in mild to moderate cases of hemiparesis. , 2013 .

[64]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.