Hydroxyapatite-coated subperiosteal dental implants: design rationale and clinical experience.

[1]  M. T. Singer,et al.  Dental implications of nickel hypersensitivity. , 1986, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  H. P. Drobeck,et al.  Tissue response in dogs to dense hydroxylapatite implantation in the femur. , 1986, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  J. Thomas,et al.  Hydroxylapatite as an alloplastic graft in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. , 1985, Journal of periodontology.

[4]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  Effect of hydroxyapatite impregnation on skeletal bonding of porous coated implants. , 1980, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  R. Simonsen,et al.  Overcoming the potential problem of fractures of vitreous carbon implants. , 1978, Implantologist.

[6]  Golec Ts.  Maxillary unilateral subperiosteal implants. , 1977 .

[7]  Golec Ts,et al.  CAD-CAM multiplanar diagnostic imaging for subperiosteal implants. , 1986 .

[8]  M. Jarcho.  Biomaterial aspects of calcium phosphates. Properties and applications. , 1986, Dental clinics of North America.

[9]  Linkow Li.  Evolutionary design trends in the mandibular subperiosteal implant. , 1984 .

[10]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[11]  R. James.  The support system and pergingival mechanisms surrounding oral implants. , 1979, Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs.

[12]  A. Gershkoff,et al.  Fundamentals of the implant denture , 1952 .