Abstract While the use of gloves often aid in the safety of completing tasks, and in some cases can even increase performance, as occurs with torquing tasks, there is most often a trade off between increased safety and performance capability when donning gloves. This is especially true in the microgravity EVA environment. The objectives of the present program of research were to examine grasp force at maximal and submaximal exertions, and to address the possibility of a relationship tactility and grasp force. A series of studies were conducted to examine grasp force at the hand/handle interface under a variety of performance conditions. Experiment 1 was conducted to examine the effect of glove type, pressure differential, and lifted load on grasp force at submaximal exertions. Experiment 2 also examined the effect of glove type and lifted load on submaximal grasp force. In addition, handle size and handle orientation were also examined. Experiment 3 was an examination of the effect of glove type, load lifted, handle size and handle orientation on maximal grasp force. Findings indicated that grasp force was effected by frictional and load tactile feedback. Consistent with published evidence, there was a strong glove effect at maximal exertions. However, the glove effect was marginal at submaximal exertions. This suggests that the neuro-muscular mechanisms utilized during maximal exertions are differentially applied and/or different from those used during submaximal or “just holding” types of exertion. The implications for the designer are discussed. Relevance to industry Across industries, gloves are donned to reduce the likelihood of damage to the human hand. However, there is an inherent trade-off between safety and performance with the use of gloves. This study found glove performance differences between submaximal and maximal exertions. Therefore, to increase task performance and worker's safety, engineers must consider exertion levels when choosing the type of glove to use.
[1]
Ram R. Bishu,et al.
Investigation of the effects of extravehicular activity (EVA) gloves on performance
,
1993
.
[2]
Ram R. Bishu,et al.
An Analysis of Grasp Force Degradation with Commercially Available Gloves
,
1986
.
[3]
A Mital,et al.
An ergonomic evaluation of dexterity and tactility with increase in examination/surgical glove thickness.
,
1995,
Ergonomics.
[4]
J. Lyman,et al.
Prehension force as a measure of psychomotor skill for bare and gloved hands.
,
1958
.
[5]
J. Lyman,et al.
Effects of surface friction on skilled performance with bare and gloved hands.
,
1958
.
[6]
Y C Shih,et al.
The effects of weight levels and gloves on the ability to discriminate weight difference.
,
1996,
Ergonomics.
[7]
Ramaratnam R Bishu,et al.
The effects of extra vehicular activity (EVA) gloves on human performance
,
1995
.
[8]
C K Bensel,et al.
The effects of various thicknesses of chemical protective gloves on manual dexterity.
,
1993,
Ergonomics.
[9]
Ramaratnam R Bishu,et al.
Glove attributes: Can they predict performance?
,
1994
.
[10]
D. Chaffin,et al.
A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing.
,
1974,
American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.