Optimal dose of injection in activation study with O-15 water and PET

In activation studies with the bolus method for O-15 water and PET, the radiotracer concentration may reach the limits of the system in terms of dead time correction and accidental coincidence. To obtain the optimal injection dose of O-15 water, we performed a normal volunteer study to evaluate the relationship between the injected dose and the radioactivity concentration in the brain and a phantom study to evaluate the performance of the PET scanner (PCT3600W) under high count rate conditions and the effect of averaging on the signal to noise ratio for the PET images.A linear relationship was noted between the injected dose (normalized for each body weight: x) and the mean radiotracer concentration in the brain measured by PET (y) (y = 2.52 + 30.1x, n = 64, r = 0.87, p < 0.001). The percent error in the measurement of radioactivity with PET was within ± 5% in the 100 to 2000 nCi/m/ (3.7–74 KBq/mZ) range. Below 100 nCi/mZ (3.7 KBq/mZ), the percent error increased due to the rapid increase in noise in the reconstructed images. Over 1000 nCi/ mZ (37 KBq/mZ), on the other hand, the noise was almost unchanged.With our PET scanner, the optimal range of the radiotracer concentration in the brain is below 1000 nCi/mZ (37 KBq/mZ), corresponding to an injection dose of 33 mCi (1.22 GBq)/60 kg body weight. With the same total dose, the increment of number of repeated measurements for averaging provided the better signal to noise ratio. In designing a paradigm for an activation PET study, the injection dose and the number of repeated measurements for averaging should be considered.

[1]  Y Yonekura,et al.  PET and the autoradiographic method with continuous inhalation of oxygen-15-gas: theoretical analysis and comparison with conventional steady-state methods. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  M. Mintun,et al.  A Noninvasive Approach to Quantitative Functional Brain Mapping with H215O and Positron Emission Tomography , 1984, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[3]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  A Noninvasive Positron Computed Tomography Technique Using Oxygen-15-Labeled Water for the Evaluation of Neurobehavioral Task Batteries , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[4]  K. Kearfott Absorbed dose estimates for positron emission tomography (PET): C15O, 11CO, and CO15O. , 1982, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Performance evaluation of the PC-2048: a new 15-slice encoded-crystal PET scanner for neurological studies. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[6]  I Kanno,et al.  Rapid measurement of cerebral blood flow with positron emission tomography. , 1991, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[7]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Performance standards in positron emission tomography. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Hidenao Fukuyama,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of regional cerebral blood flow change with H215O and positron emission tomography using a mechanical injector and a standard arterial input function , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  M. Raichle,et al.  Mapping human somatosensory cortex with positron emission tomography. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  H. Freund,et al.  Variation of perisylvian and calcarine anatomic landmarks within stereotaxic proportional coordinates. , 1990, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 4. Effect of Accidental Coincidences , 1981, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  M. Honda,et al.  Both primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area play an important role in complex finger movement. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.