Myocardial scar identification based on analysis of Look–Locker and 3D late gadolinium enhanced MRI

The aim of this study is to introduce and evaluate an approach for objective and reproducible scar identification from late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) MR by analysis of LGE data with post-contrast T1 mapping from a routinely acquired T1 scout Look–Locker (LL) sequence. In 90 post-infarction patients, a LL sequence was acquired prior to a three-dimensional LGE sequence covering the entire left ventricle. In 60/90 patients (training set), the T1 relaxation rates of remote myocardium and dense myocardial scar were linearly regressed to that of blood. The learned linear relationship was applied to 30/90 patients (validation set) to identify the remote myocardium and dense scar, and to normalize the LGE signal intensity to a range from 0 to 100 %. A 50 % threshold was applied to identify myocardial scar. In the validation set, two observers independently performed manual scar identification, annotated reference regions for the full-width-half-maxima (FWHM) and standard deviation (SD) method, and analyzed the LL sequence for the proposed method. Compared with the manual, FWHM, and SD methods, the proposed method demonstrated the highest inter-class correlation coefficient (0.997) and Dice overlap index (98.7 ± 1.3 %) between the two observers. The proposed method also showed excellent agreement with the gold-standard manual scar identification, with a Dice index of 89.8 ± 7.5 and 90.2 ± 6.6 % for the two observers, respectively. Combined analysis of LL and LGE sequences leads to objective and reproducible myocardial scar identification in post-infarction patients.

[1]  Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt,et al.  Model-based alignment of Look-Locker MRI sequences for calibrated myocardical scar tissue quantification , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[2]  P. Kellman,et al.  Quantitative myocardial infarction on delayed enhancement MRI. Part I: Animal validation of an automated feature analysis and combined thresholding infarct sizing algorithm , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  C. Lorenz,et al.  Measurement of the gadopentetate dimeglumine partition coefficient in human myocardium in vivo: normal distribution and elevation in acute and chronic infarction. , 2001, Radiology.

[4]  C. Higgins,et al.  Alterations in T 1 of normal and reperfused infarcted myocardium after Gd‐BOPTA versus GD‐DTPA on inversion recovery EPI† , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. , 1999, Circulation.

[6]  Raymond J Kim,et al.  Infarct morphology identifies patients with substrate for sustained ventricular tachycardia. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Katja Zeppenfeld,et al.  Infarct Tissue Heterogeneity Assessed With Contrast-Enhanced MRI Predicts Spontaneous Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[8]  Pierre Croisille,et al.  Assessment of myocardial fibrosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  Infarct Tissue Heterogeneity by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies Enhanced Cardiac Arrhythmia Susceptibility in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction , 2007, Circulation.

[10]  Sung Ho Hwang,et al.  Correction with blood T1 is essential when measuring post-contrast myocardial T1 value in patients with acute myocardial infarction , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[11]  David M Higgins,et al.  Modified Look‐Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high‐resolution T1 mapping of the heart , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  J. Milles,et al.  Automated segmentation of myocardial scar in late enhancement MRI using combined intensity and spatial information , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  P. Core Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy:quantification of late gadolinium enhancement with contrast-enhanced cardiovascular MR imaging , 2011 .

[14]  P. Kellman,et al.  Quantitative myocardial infarction on delayed enhancement MRI. Part II: Clinical application of an automated feature analysis and combined thresholding infarct sizing algorithm , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  D. Look,et al.  Time Saving in Measurement of NMR and EPR Relaxation Times , 1970 .

[16]  D. Bluemke,et al.  Myocardial T1 mapping with MRI: Comparison of look‐locker and MOLLI sequences , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Stefan Neubauer,et al.  Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (ShMOLLI) for clinical myocardial T1-mapping at 1.5 and 3 T within a 9 heartbeat breathhold , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[18]  Marie-Pierre Jolly,et al.  Motion correction for myocardial T1 mapping using image registration with synthetic image estimation , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Olga Bondarenko,et al.  Quantification of late gadolinium enhanced CMR in viability assessment in chronic ischemic heart disease: a comparison to functional outcome , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[20]  Dan W Rettmann,et al.  Accurate and Objective Infarct Sizing by Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Canine Myocardial Infarction Model , 2022 .

[21]  W. Stevenson,et al.  Characterization of the Peri-Infarct Zone by Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is a Powerful Predictor of Post–Myocardial Infarction Mortality , 2006, Circulation.