Beyond the system vs. package dualism in Performance Management Systems design: A loose coupling approach
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Victoria L. Mitchell,et al. The Effects of Coupling it and Work Process Strategies in Redesign Projects , 1999 .
[2] Teemu Malmi,et al. Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems , 2016 .
[3] Tony Davila. An exploratory study on the emergence of management control systems: formalizing human resources in small growing firms , 2005 .
[4] P. Bentler,et al. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .
[5] Isabella Grabner,et al. Management Control as a System or a Package? Conceptual and Empirical Issues , 2013 .
[6] R. Anthony,et al. Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis , 1965 .
[7] V. Govindarajan,et al. Strategy, Control Systems, and Resource Sharing: Effects on Business-Unit Performance , 1990 .
[8] T. Pfeiffer,et al. A Descriptive Analysis on the Implementation of Balanced Scorecards in German-Speaking Countries , 2003 .
[9] Teemu Malmi,et al. Configurations of control: An exploratory analysis , 2015 .
[10] O. J. Dunn. Multiple Comparisons among Means , 1961 .
[11] Sally K. Widener,et al. The role of performance measurement and evaluation in building organizational capabilities and performance , 2010 .
[12] K. Weick,et al. Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .
[13] A. Hopwood. Accounting and the environment , 2009 .
[14] Jodie Moll. Editorial: Special issue on innovation and product development , 2015 .
[15] Scott B. MacKenzie,et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[16] Mark W. Dirsmith,et al. Budgeting as a means for control and loose coupling , 1983 .
[17] Theresa Libby,et al. Beyond budgeting or budgeting reconsidered? A survey of North-American budgeting practice , 2010 .
[18] C. Ittner,et al. The influence of funding source and legislative requirements on government cost accounting practices , 1996 .
[19] S. Shapiro,et al. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .
[20] Thomas Ahrens,et al. Accounting for Flexibility and Efficiency: A Field Study of Management Control Systems in a Restaurant Chain , 2004 .
[21] K. Weick. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.
[22] Mikko Sandelin,et al. Operation of management control practices as a package: A case study on control system variety in a growth firm context , 2008 .
[23] Sally K. Widener,et al. An Empirical Analysis of the Levers of Control Framework , 2005 .
[24] D. Marginson,et al. "Continuous" budgeting: Reconciling budget flexibility with budgetary control , 2010 .
[25] David Otley,et al. Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research , 1999 .
[26] Teresa M. Amabile,et al. How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.
[27] S. Widener,et al. Creativity and Control: A Paradox. Evidence from the Levers of Control Framework , 2017 .
[28] R. Banker,et al. The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Performance Measures Linked to Strategy , 2004 .
[29] David J. Teece,et al. Business models and dynamic capabilities , 2017 .
[30] Sven Modell,et al. Goals versus institutions: the development of performance measurement in the Swedish university sector , 2003 .
[31] Isabella Grabner,et al. Incentive System Design in Creativity-Dependent Firms , 2014 .
[32] Jean-François Henri,et al. Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective , 2006 .
[33] K. Weick. Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .
[34] Christopher S. Chapman,et al. Loosely coupled performance measurement systems , 2007 .
[35] Stephan Kramer,et al. How Control System Design Affects Performance Evaluation Compression: The Role of Information Accuracy and Outcome Transparency , 2016 .
[36] Steven E. Salterio,et al. The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Common and Unique Performance Measures , 2000 .
[37] Kenneth A. Merchant,et al. The effects of financial controls on data manipulation and management Myopia , 1990 .
[38] Joshua D. Newton,et al. Resolving contradictions in institutional demands through loose coupling , 2014 .
[39] D. Marginson,et al. Encouraging strategic behaviour while maintaining management control: multi-functional project teams, budgets, and the negotiation of shared accountabilities in contemporary enterprises , 2005 .
[40] Kim Langfield-Smith,et al. Structural equation modeling in management accounting research: critical analysis and opportunities , 2004 .
[41] Josep Bisbe,et al. Defining management accounting constructs: A methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification , 2007 .
[42] Joel Demski. Uncertainty and Evaluation Based on Controllable Performance , 1976 .
[43] Sven Modell. Performance Measurement Myths in the Public Sector: A Research Note , 2004 .
[44] Shirley J. Daniel,et al. Management Control Systems for J.I.T.: An Empirical Comparison of Japan and the U.S. , 1991 .
[45] Robert Simons,et al. Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems , 1991 .
[46] Julia Mundy,et al. Creating Dynamic Tensions Through a Balanced Use of Management Control Systems , 2010 .
[47] Antonio Dávila,et al. Reasons for management control systems adoption: Insights from product development systems choice by early-stage entrepreneurial companies , 2009 .
[48] Robert A. Simons,et al. Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal , 1994 .
[49] D. Brown,et al. Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions , 2008 .
[50] Robert A. Simons. How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal , 1994 .
[51] Karl E. Weick,et al. Administering Education in Loosely Coupled Schools. , 1982 .
[52] E. Paraskevopoulou,et al. Disentangling the Role of Management Control Systems for Product and Process Innovation in Different Contexts , 2018, European Accounting Review.
[53] R. Kaplan,et al. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .
[54] A. V. D. Ven,et al. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .
[55] D. Otley,et al. The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation , 2004 .
[56] Frances S. Berry. Innovation in Public Management: The Adoption of Strategic Planning , 1994 .
[57] Mathew L. A. Hayward,et al. Entrepreneurs' capital budgeting orientations and innovation outputs: evidence from Australian biotechnology firms , 2017 .
[58] M. Abernethy,et al. The role of professional control in the management of complex organizations , 1995 .
[59] Rafik I. Beekun,et al. Organization Structure from a Loose Coupling Perspective: A Multidimensional Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..
[60] R. Scapens,et al. Institutionalization and practice variation in the management control of a global/local setting , 2009 .
[61] Moshe Farjoun. Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .
[62] Mariannunziata Liguori,et al. Accounting change: explaining the outcomes, interpreting the process , 2011 .
[63] T. Groot,et al. Loosely Coupled Results Control in Dutch Municipalities , 2014 .
[64] Cameron Guthrie,et al. AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE “FIT”BETWEEN STRATEGY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN , 1994 .
[65] William H. Glick,et al. Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .
[66] Simon Rodan,et al. More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness , 2004 .
[67] Christopher D. Ittner,et al. Does measuring intangibles for management purposes improve performance? A review of the evidence , 2008 .
[68] Robert Drazin,et al. Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design , 1997 .
[69] Johnathan Roberts,et al. The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth , 2004 .
[70] K. Pavitt,et al. Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .
[71] S. Shapiro,et al. An Approximate Analysis of Variance Test for Normality , 1972 .
[72] D. Larcker,et al. Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective , 2001 .
[73] I. Kurtulus,et al. Multi-Project Scheduling: Categorization of Heuristic Rules Performance , 1982 .
[74] Thomas H. Davenport,et al. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .
[75] Paul M Collier,et al. The Power of Accounting: A Field Study of Local Financial Management in a Police Force , 2001 .
[76] Jan Mouritsen,et al. Accounting as an engine: The performativity of calculative practices and the dynamics of innovation , 2015 .
[77] C. Lance,et al. What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research , 2010 .
[78] R. Chenhall,et al. The role of innovation in the evolution of management accounting and its integration into management control , 2015 .
[79] Sinikka Moilanen. Learning and the loosely coupled elements of control , 2012 .
[80] Robert S. Kaplan,et al. Formal Measures in Informal Management: Can a Balanced Scorecard Change a Culture? , 2015 .
[81] Berend Van der Kolk,et al. Strategy implementation through hierarchical couplings in a management control package: an explorative case study , 2016 .
[82] R. Lennox,et al. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .
[83] Margaret A. Abernethy,et al. A Field Study of Control System “Redesign”: The Impact of Institutional Processes on Strategic Choice* , 1996 .
[84] Sven Modell. Institutional Research on Performance Measurement and Management in the Public Sector Accounting Literature: A Review and Assessment , 2009 .
[85] Marshall W. Meyer,et al. Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .
[86] Mary A. Malina,et al. Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard , 2001 .
[87] Falconer Mitchell,et al. Utilising a typology of management accounting change: An empirical analysis , 2005 .
[88] R. Chenhall. Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .
[89] Michael D. Shields. Established Management Accounting Knowledge , 2015 .
[90] Kari Lukka,et al. Management accounting change and stability: Loosely coupled rules and routines in action , 2007 .
[91] Anne M. Lillis,et al. The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design , 1995 .
[92] David Otley,et al. The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014 , 2016 .
[93] Robert W. Scapens,et al. Corporatisation and Accounting Change: The Role of Accounting and Accountants in a Malaysian Public Utility , 2007 .
[94] Amrit Tiwana,et al. Systems Development Ambidexterity: Explaining the Complementary and Substitutive Roles of Formal and Informal Controls , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[95] Catherine F. Schryer,et al. Using Loose Coupling Theory to Understand Interprofessional Collaborative Practice on a Transplantation Team , 2014 .
[96] John W. Meyer,et al. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.
[97] David Otley,et al. The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis , 2009 .
[98] Joan L. Luft,et al. Nonfinancial Information and Accounting: A Reconsideration of Benefits and Challenges , 2009 .
[99] W. Kruskal,et al. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .
[100] Robert B. Glassman,et al. Persistence and loose coupling in living systems , 1973 .
[101] Jeremy Hope,et al. Beyond Budgeting: How Managers Can Break Free from the Annual Performance Trap , 2003 .
[102] D. Otley. The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis , 1980 .