Novel Method for Moisture Susceptibility and Rutting Evaluation Using Hamburg Wheel Tracking Test

The Hamburg wheel tracking test (HWTT) has been widely used as a standard laboratory test to evaluate the moisture susceptibility and rutting resistance of asphalt mixtures. The stripping infection point and the rut depth at a certain number of load cycles are two common parameters obtained from the test. Although these parameters have been widely adopted by several transportation agencies, the accuracy and variability in characterizing mixture properties of these parameters have been questioned. In this study, a novel method to analyze the HWTT results is introduced and three new parameters are proposed to measure the moisture susceptibility and rutting resistance of asphalt mixtures. The new parameters are compared against the current ones to assess their capability to discriminate between three types of asphalt mixtures with different performance results in the HWTT. Significant advantages in characterizing mixture resistance to stripping and rutting are demonstrated by the new parameters. In addition, the effect of antistripping additives and recycled materials on mixture performance in the HWTT is evaluated with mixtures from a field project in Texas. Test results for the new parameters show that the addition of antistripping additives improves the susceptibility of asphalt mixtures to moisture. Specifically, the use of lime is more beneficial for improving mixture performance than a liquid antistripping agent. Conversely, the addition of recycled materials provides mixtures with increased moisture susceptibility but improved rutting resistance.

[1]  K. D. Stuart,et al.  Correlation of superpave G*/sin δ with rutting susceptibility from laboratory mixture tests , 1995 .

[2]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Evaluation of the Moisture Susceptibility of WMA Technologies , 2014 .

[3]  Stacey D Diefenderfer,et al.  Laboratory Evaluation of Warm Asphalt Properties and Performance , 2008 .

[4]  R. Christopher Williams,et al.  Ranking of HMA Moisture Sensitivity Tests in Iowa , 2012 .

[5]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Prediction of Permanent Deformation in Flexible Pavement Materials , 1989 .

[6]  Walaa S Mogawer,et al.  EFFECT OF COARSE AGGREGATE CONTENT ON STONE MATRIX ASPHALT DURABILITY AND LOW-TEMPERATURE CRACKING , 1995 .

[7]  P Romero,et al.  EVALUATING ACCELERATED RUT TESTERS , 1998 .

[8]  John T Harvey,et al.  TEST METHODS TO PREDICT MOISTURE SENSITIVITY OF HOT-MIX ASPHALT PAVEMENTS , 2003 .

[9]  Kevin D Stuart,et al.  CORRELATION OF SUPERPAVE G*/SIN DELTA WITH RUTTING SUSCEPTIBILITY FROM LABORATORY MIXTURE TESTS (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE) , 1995 .

[10]  Graham C Hurley,et al.  Evaluation of Potential Processes for Use in Warm Mix Asphalt (With Discussion) , 2006 .

[11]  Robert Kluttz,et al.  High-Performance Thin-Lift Overlays with High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Content and Warm-Mix Asphalt Technology , 2012 .

[12]  Serji N. Amirkhanian,et al.  Laboratory Investigation of Moisture Damage in Warm-Mix Asphalt Containing Moist Aggregate , 2009 .

[13]  T Aschenbrener,et al.  INFLUENCE OF TESTING VARIABLES ON THE RESULTS FROM THE HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACKING DEVICE. FINAL REPORT , 1993 .

[14]  Richard Izzo,et al.  Use of the Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device for Evaluating Moisture Susceptibility of Hot-Mix Asphalt , 1999 .