Pulse-step models of control strategies for dynamic ocular accommodation and disaccommodation

Dynamic properties and control strategies of step responses by accommodation and disaccommodation differ from one another. Peak velocity of accommodation increases with response magnitude, while peak velocity and peak acceleration of disaccommodation increase with starting position. These dynamic properties can be modeled as control strategies that use independent acceleration-pulse and velocity-step components that are integrated respectively into phasic-velocity signals that control movement and tonic-position signals that control magnitude. Accommodation is initiated toward its final destination by an acceleration-pulse whose width increases with response magnitude to increase peak velocity. Disaccommodation is initiated toward a default destination (the far point) by an acceleration-pulse whose height increases with dioptric distance of the starting position to increase peak velocity and peak acceleration. Both responses are completed and maintained by tonic-position signals whose amplitudes are proportional to the final destination. Mismatched amplitudes of phasic-velocity and tonic-position signals in disaccommodation produce unstable step responses.

[1]  S. Judge,et al.  Neurons in the monkey midbrain with activity related to vergence eye movement and accommodation. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  George K Hung,et al.  A dual-mode dynamic model of the human accommodation system , 2002, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[3]  Clifton M. Schor,et al.  A pulse-step model of accommodation dynamics in the aging eye , 2005, Vision Research.

[4]  Kenneth J. Ciuffreda,et al.  Dynamic aspects of accommodation: age and presbyopia , 2004, Vision Research.

[5]  Lawrence E Mays,et al.  Neuronal circuitry controlling the near response , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  M. Campbell,et al.  Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia , 1999, Vision Research.

[7]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  Single-unit activity in the primate nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis related to vergence and ocular accommodation. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  K J Ciuffreda,et al.  Dynamics of human voluntary accommodation. , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[9]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  An area for vergence eye movement in primate frontal cortex , 2000, Nature.

[10]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans , 2003, Vision Research.

[11]  L E Mays,et al.  Neural control of vergence eye movements: neurons encoding vergence velocity. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Clifton M. Schor,et al.  Dynamic Control of Ocular Disaccommodation , 2005 .

[13]  David A. Robinson,et al.  Models of the saccadic eye movement control system , 1973, Kybernetik.

[14]  Harry J. Wyatt,et al.  Application of a simple mechanical model of accommodation to the aging eye , 1993, Vision Research.

[15]  C. Schor,et al.  A dynamic model of cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence: simulations of step and frequency responses. , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Characteristics of near response cells projecting to the oculomotor nucleus. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  H Zhang,et al.  Neurons in the posterior interposed nucleus of the cerebellum related to vergence and accommodation. I. Steady-state characteristics. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M W Morgan,et al.  Accommodation and vergence. , 1968, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  C. Schor,et al.  A pulse-step model of accommodation dynamics , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  Clifton M. Schor,et al.  Acceleration characteristics of human ocular accommodation , 2005, Vision Research.

[21]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  The role of cerebro-ponto-cerebellar pathways in the control of vergence eye movements , 1996, Eye.

[22]  D S Zee,et al.  Neurological aspects of vergence eye movements. , 1989, Revue neurologique.

[23]  H. Kornhuber,et al.  Natural and drug-induced variations of velocity and duration of human saccadic eye movements: Evidence for a control of the neural pulse generator by local feedback , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  Clifton M. Schor,et al.  Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: First and second-order dynamics , 2006, Vision Research.

[25]  Paul D. Gamlin Neural Mechanisms for the Control of Vergence Eye Movements , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[26]  K Ukai,et al.  Amount of defocus is not used as an error signal in the control system of accommodation dynamics , 1997, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[27]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive , 1986, Vision Research.

[28]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Accommodation dynamics in aging rhesus monkeys. , 1998, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[29]  Tara L. Alvarez,et al.  Divergence eye movements are dependent on initial stimulus position , 2005, Vision Research.

[30]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Influence of amplitude and starting point on accommodative dynamics in humans. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[32]  G L van der Heijde,et al.  Age-Related Changes in the Accommodation Mechanism , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[33]  Paul L. Kaufman,et al.  Reproducible stimulation of ciliary muscle contraction in the cynomolgus monkey via a permanent indwelling midbrain electrode , 1989, Brain Research.

[34]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys , 2002, Vision Research.