Development of an age-dependent thoracic injury criterion for frontal

Data from 93 human cadaver tests (age range 17-86 years, mean 60.2, S.D. 13.3) were used to develop thoracic injury risk functions for frontal loading. The set of potential predictors included the maximum chest deflection, the age of the cadaver at death, the cadaver's gender, and the loading condition on the anterior thorax: blunt hub (41 tests), seat belt (26 tests), air bag (12 tests), and combined belt-and-bag (14 tests). Predicted outcomes were the probability of any rib fractures (onset of injury) and the probability of greater than six rib fractures (severe injury). Linear logistic regression models were used with the outcome modeled as a binary response (injury, no injury). It is shown that the injury risk function is not dependent on the loading condition (e.g., the 50% risk of injury does not change when the loading condition changes), but that the injury risk function is strongly dependent on the age of the cadaver at death. A significant injury risk model with good ability to discriminate injury from non-injury tests (p < 0.0001, Chi-square = 21.49, area under ROC = 0.867, Kruskal's Gamma = 0.732) is presented using only maximum chest deflection and cadaver age as predictors of injury risk. The 50% risk of any rib fractures is found to occur at 35% chest deflection for a 30-year-old, but at 13% deflection for a 70-year-old. The 50% risk of severe injury is shown to occur at 33% chest deflection for a 70-year-old, but at 43% for a 30-year-old. For the covering abstract see ITRD E825082.

[1]  Alan M. Nahum,et al.  Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II , 1971 .

[2]  David C. Viano,et al.  Thoracic injury potential , 1978 .

[3]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[4]  J R Crandall,et al.  BIOFIDELITY EVALUATION OF THE THOR ADVANCED FRONTAL CRASH TEST DUMMY , 2000 .

[5]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[6]  J. Hanley Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. , 1989, Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.

[7]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Development of an Improved Thoracic Injury Criterion , 1998 .

[8]  R W Kent,et al.  Driver and right-front passenger restraint system interaction, injury potential, and thoracic injury prediction. , 2000, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[9]  J. Crandall,et al.  Error analysis of curvature-based contour measurement devices , 2000 .

[10]  Matthew R. Maltese,et al.  CHESTBAND ANALYSIS OF HUMAN TOLERANCE TO SIDE IMPACT , 1997 .

[11]  R W Kent,et al.  The influence of superficial soft tissues and restraint condition on thoracic skeletal injury prediction. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[12]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  RESTRAINED HYBRID III DUMMY-BASED CRITERIA FOR THORACIC HARD-TISSUE INJURY PREDICTION , 2001 .

[13]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  THREE-POINT HARNESS ACCIDENT AND LABORATORY DATA COMPARISON , 1974 .

[14]  P Prasad,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL BASIS FOR INJURY CRITERIA USED IN CRASHWORTHINESS REGULATIONS: "BERTIL ALDMAN AWARD" LECTURE , 1999 .

[15]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Strength of biological materials , 1970 .

[16]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of human thoracic ribs. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[18]  John W. Melvin,et al.  AGE EFFECTS ON THORACIC INJURY TOLERANCE , 1996 .

[19]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Thoracic Trauma Assessment Formulations for Restrained Drivers in Simulated Frontal Impacts , 1994 .

[20]  Richard W. Kent,et al.  Radiographic Detection of Rib Fractures: A Restraint-Based Study of Occupants in Car Crashes , 2002 .

[21]  J. Crandall,et al.  Thoracic Response and Trauma in Air Bag Deployment Tests with Out-of-Position Small Female Surrogates , 1999 .